Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Quite rich …. “…are only exposing themselves as having ulterior motives with this stock.”
….since no one would say research analyst and other aliases with XXXX word counts don’t have an ulterior motive. I think my eyes rolled out of my sockets when I read the quoted words above.
946 words … of no value.
2004??? Seriously
Hmmm having short and long term strategies on holding a stock like this..where it makes someone like me money - wouldn’t call that 100% wrong. I don’t get emotionally involved or attached like some monikers on this board. Maybe someone should research better lube products.
Here we go again with the comments on researching and personal thoughts and now it’s going to visit the x cent range. If it does it’s due to direct and indirect manipulation - including by monikers on this board.
Name the dozen red flags you see from your expert and research experience, if you wouldn’t mind. Thanks.
Just a lot of words that’s it…there is always a motive. FYI - if someone researched more the existence of a 510k submission wouldn’t question its existence.
Boilingman I only hang around with a small amount of what I used to hold, since I still believe in technology, just not sure (nor do I pretend to know) what indirect benefit Liquidmetal will have from future success of the tech. I just ask myself:
If Arburg, Engel and L.K. Machinery got involved to support an amorphous metal molding platform through cooperation with current market players, why shouldn’t I hang around with a small little pot? Everyone has to make their own decisions but complaining or whining on a board doesn’t do anything.
Can you tell us the “patients” names?
Still holding some…the possibilities are there I just stay realistic.
At least pull the right numbers on assets for Liquidmetal …
Hard to say man. I decided to hold another year to see where things went post TC taking over. This stock is still a major gamble. However, when I found the Liquidmetal Japan site and the LinkedIn information directly connecting Apple to Lugees world, it made my decision to hold worthwhile for now. When you see a player like Hereaus even pushing this hard makes you wonder…why waste the effort and time if you know there is not a decent reward lurking? :)
I always said the IP and trademark are powerful things and “Liquidmetal” will benefit from it. The direct connection with Apple that even goes back to when I first found early Eontec IP filing with Apple logo should tell you there is something there. This thing should be more in the .15-.20 cent range right now.
https://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Amorphous+metal+&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=Golf+&FIELD2=&d=PG01
Wonder why Karsten (PING) keeps going with AM/BMG filings….always wondered why ….
Hmmmmmm….
I trust official Apple list as that moneymorning site had Liquidmetal previously listed long time ago…don’t trust it
Here is the official supplier list:
https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple-Supplier-List.pdf
Updates filed on two remaining trademarks
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88863018&docId=ESU20210917172756#docIndex=2&page=1
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88862995&docId=ESU20210917172756#docIndex=2&page=1
Extension reason on both: product or service research or development
You and liquid horse shit … geez that’s creepy. …this is about liquidmetal and not poop
Is it their separation agreement.
7. Survival of Certain Obligations. Notwithstanding the termination of Executive’s employment, Executive agrees and acknowledges that Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation, and Invention Assignment Agreement, dated January 15, 2021, signed by Executive in favor of the Company (the “Executive Obligation Agreement”) shall continue to remain in full force in effect at all times hereafter and after the Termination Date in accordance with and subject to the terms and provisions of such agreement. Executive’s obligations and Company’s rights under the Executive Obligation Agreement will be unaffected by the provisions of this Agreement.
https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2021/0204434.html
Titanium …metallic glass…apple
Just sharing not implying anything
Someone says there are two employees, you truly believe that?
Oooooo show us the proof that you filed ….
Wow that’s some deep thoughts ….
Ha, Lugeeworld! ;)
Funny how the translation quoted didn’t focus on the following:
“We have the ability to form, plus their global With a patented formula, we can industrialize liquid metal and promote it to the world."
One needs the other …
Show us the specific sections in the filing to support these outlandish claims. Oh this is going to be good let me get my coke and popcorn…
Being underwhelmed is a personal choice. … I’m Sure you would find something negative even if they broke even.
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=Liquidmetal&OS=Liquidmetal&RS=Liquidmetal
Still includes Liquidmetal in this continuation patent
“
A moldable material from which features are formed may be formed from substantially any suitable plastic or resin. For instance, a moldable material may be formed from a plastic such as polycarbonate or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). It should be appreciated that a moldable material is not limited to being a plastic or a resin. By way of example, a moldable material may be an injectable ceramic, or a moldable or injectable metal such as LiquidMetal. Liquid metals, and the use thereof, are described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/949,449, filed Jul. 12, 2007, and entitled "INSERT MOLDING LIQUID METAL AROUND GLASS," which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Funny how Josh is capitalizing on some fame for something that I brought up months ago when the filings Came out at at the uspto portal. Sometimes I think he’s real opportunistic…I have always believed that why protect a trademark/brand and it’s usage if it has no value? Then why use Firms historically used by Apple. I don’t think anyone has noticed that eontecs filings in the US do not use these firms. Hmmm, Apple allowed security release back to CIP in 2016, for the Eontec Liquidmetal license, but no we don’t see Eontec be granted pathway to these furns (not saying Apple is blocking them). Seems the Liquidmetal brand is the direct benefit.
Is this a joke or question?
Never thought he was a manufacturing guy, more of R&D and development for niche stuff. I think Amorphology is a good spot for him but Amorphology has a green machine :)
Liquidmetal or Eontec aren’t molding the outside, they would be molding the inside part, so not sure that the “mirage” applies
The structural piece is still there
https://liquidmetal.com/amorphous-metal/
Hmmmmm...Beats...
https://liquidmetal.com/consumer/
Posted about them a long while back
Here is one from a while back
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22DONGGUAN+JIANYE+MATERIAL+TECHNOLOGY%22&OS=%22DONGGUAN+JIANYE+MATERIAL+TECHNOLOGY%22&RS=%22DONGGUAN+JIANYE+MATERIAL+TECHNOLOGY%22
That image, many will say generic but ok…
From Honda .... never seen this come up with them before
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=3&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Metallic+glass%22&OS=%22Metallic+glass%22&RS=%22Metallic+glass%22
“
[0031] In block 810, the method 800 may include welding a metallic reinforcement material to portions of a metallic blank to form a hood frame blank. In an aspect for example, the operator may weld the metallic reinforcement material to the portions of the metallic blank to form the hood frame blank. Both the metallic reinforcement material and the metallic blank may be flat sheets. In an implementation, the metallic reinforcement material may be a metal-matrix composite such as a ceramic bearing metal-matrix composite. In another implementation, the metallic reinforcement material may be one of: AL/Alumina (aluminum oxide or AL2O3) metal-matrix composite, silicon carbine metal-matrix composite, carbon fiber metal-matrix composite, glass fiber metal-matrix composite, basalt fiber metal matrix composite discontinuously reinforced metal (DRX), bulk metallic glass (BMG), or high entropy alloy (HEA). Candidate materials for the metallic reinforcement include materials that have a relatively high specific stiffness, the ratio of an elastic modulus of the material to density, optionally greater than approximately 25 MN-m/kg, while being ductile enough to undergo the forming process to create the hood frame without fracturing. In an implementation, the metallic reinforcement material may be approximately 1.0-3.0 mm thick, preferably 1.5-2.0 mm thick. In another implementation, the metallic reinforcement composite material may be between 10% and 150% of a thickness of the metallic blank, preferably between 50% and 100% of the thickness of the metal blank. U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2019/0047031 describes methods of adding a reinforcement to a metal blank prior to a forming process and is incorporated by reference herein. “
Barney visser