Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have an incurable disease. I started using medical MJ about 18 months ago. I am by no means a stoner. I have paid over 250 in one trip to the dispensary. I go more than once a month. It is good and the purity is certified. I have been to Etain and Medmen. There was and is, for certain products, a big shortage of product. You know why? Not because of anything to do with demand or supply. Not to due with anything relating to production. The products where being held and tested for purity and quality by a third party. This is a major reason, why people like me, with a disease for which there is no cure, and a good job who is well positioned in life, is willing to spend that much money for some “stoner weed” as you put it.
Warren Buffett’s investing advice is “Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.”
So do what others aren’t doing.
As we have seen many “new” posters and/or usernames pop up here over the past few months, constantly creating the same negative posts over and over again, this just makes me feel more confident in ACB.
The top left corner. The grey box. It says 11:30am and 2/12/2019.
Why does the chart have a date stamp of February 12th, and a time stamp of 11:30am?
I have been an IHUB member for many years. I read the boards but have not posted in probably over 5 years. I have been in ACB for almost a year and I have been reading this board for that long as well. As one poster commented a short while back, I also have my series 7 and 66. I currently work for one of the large financial data consolidators/distributors. The only reason I say all this is because the lack of knowledge between the primary and secondary markets is driving me crazy. I forget the specific poster, but, when you buy stock in the secondary market it does not go to the company. This has been posted numerous times. You are simply buying from some other investor who is selling the shares they own in the secondary mareket. Unless you were involved in the original IPO, then the "company" is not taking your hard earned money. They have nothing to do with the secondary market when you sell your shares or buy more using whatever brokerage service you have. Please stop saying this company is stealing your hard earned money because you bought shares on the secondary market and the share price is decreasing. Issuing additional shares will obviously result in dilution, but the company is not getting money when you buy ACB shares in secondary market.
Good news. Good numbers. I just don't understand then, how people are not jumping all over this thing? Volume has been up recently, but that increase in volume has not been accompanied by an increase in share price as it closed below .02 yesterday. How many stocks are there that have these numbers and still trade below .03/share? I don't get it. Why haven't loads of people jumped on this?
It wasn't the first type, because these trades were well outside of the 90 second allowance for reporting, 10 minutes and seven minutes, respectively. It was also not the second type, because my systems would have marked them as such. They were not marked that way. I would not have seen a price associated with them if they were the second type defined in your (or the webpage's) "b" scenario.
I can check the raw incoming messages and compare the raw qualifier as it appeared on the feed and double check that with the qualifiers defined in the TDDS specifications (which can easily be found online if anyone is interested). But honestly, now that I have written that out, I don't think I'm going to waste my time pulling the data, because regardless, there were very large blocks of shares that were traded (or reported) outside of normal market close at a price below .02.
WLSA is an OTC Pink Limited Information listing.
For a full description of the market tiers:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/otc-101/otc-market-tiers
OTC Pink Limited Information
Designed for companies with financial reporting problems, economic distress, or in bankruptcy to make the limited information they have publicly available. The Limited Information category also includes companies that may not be troubled, but are unwilling to meet OTC Markets' Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information. Companies in this category have limited financial information not older than six months available on the OTC Disclosure & News Service or have made a filing on the SEC's EDGAR system in the previous six months.
In my opinion, JS has no real intention of ever up-listing. Sure he could make money on the stock price appreciation that would accompany an up-list, but, why not sit back and continue to these non arms length deals and make money that way. Like he has been doing for 8 years already. He can't do that if he needed to provide the necessary information and disclosures that an up-list would require.
Ten minutes after normal market close on Wednesday, someone sold 376,000 shares in a single form T transaction. Seven minutes after normal market close yesterday, someone sold 230,000 shares in a single form T transaction. The form T trade on Thursday was for .0197. Someone sold 230,000 shares for less than 2 cents.
Traditionally form T trades (after hours trading) is only accessible for institutional investors. Electronic Communications Networks, ECNs like the NYSE-Arca platform, have opened this up to individual investors, but, WLSA trades on the pink sheets. I didn't think individual investors had access to after hours trading for pink sheets. So, an institutional investor or high net worth individual (someone who knows more than we do) has dumped over 600 thousand shares in after hours trading over the past two days. The last 230K shares at a price of .0197.
It appears that nobody is going to answer each other's questions. So, if the three of you (asdfgh, fliier and altheia) want to keep this up, how about you all PM each other so everyone else doesn't have to read all the "I know more than you do" type of comments.
Correct. So why didn't you focus on the following post I made:
asdfghj,
thank you for providing rational comments as well as links. it is nice to see someone presenting relevant information as it is, good or bad, with no hyping or bashing. i just wanted to say this because i did not see many responses to your posts. keep it up. we are listening.
But I am the one with the agenda? Stop thinking too much. Not everything is a conspiracy. Just because I personally think someone is a condescending jerk off doesn't mean I am so self absorbed to think that my comments bear so much weight as to reduce the stock price so I can accumulate more shares. If you think that, then I command you to sell me your shares at .01.
Yes. Because until the value of all these announcements is figured into the stock price valuation, I don't make any more money. That is the point, right? To make money. Not just to be be able to post on some message board that "I talk to John all the time! We are best friends! Yay!"
Even if that is true, and even if all good things that have been announced come to fruition, if the stock price does not increase, based on these announements/happenings, then I don't make any more money. Thats all I care about. I don't care about John being my friend. I don't care about the need to always have the last word on this message board. I don't have a God complex. Wait...God complex...D the G...aka GoD. Hmmmm....
This message board has turned into a pissing contest, plain and simple. People are too concerned with being able to say "told you so!" It appears that some people get more satisfaction from being able to say "told you so!" than anything else.
Wow. I didn't know that you respected my opinion so much! I mean, to keep something I wrote on February 2nd, which is close to 7 months ago, so close to the forefront of your mind is flattering.
Anything that is done, is simply a means to an end. That end is an increase in stock price. Until that happens, I take everything that is done and/or said with a grain of salt.
A few years ago, when JS came back to WLSA, he promised shareholders he would not take a salary and that he would work for free becuase he personally felt he abandonded the shareholders. He was not obligated by any kind of law to do this, but this is what he stated. A few months later, he gave himself a salary, and then even backdated his pay to his original date of re-hire. This was all after he told shareholders he was not going to take a salary because he felt bad he left us to the Paulos Bros.
Also, I think within the past year or so, he received a salary of approximately 200K. Don't get all definsive and ask for links because I will not do that. If you don't believe me, that is fine. Just ignore this post. Look it up yourself. I am just calling you out for saying JS has not made money. If you are really keen, you can go ask the crazies on the ivestorvillage board. I think they used to call themselves the "knights of IV" because they banned together, pooled their shares (or at least counted the total number of shares they owned between all of them) to stop the firesale of WLSA to Newlook on the cheap. I think this was about 3 years ago.
It is of my personal opinion that JS has not forgotten about this. He is just biding his time, issuing more shares so he can finally do what he wanted to do originally. He will then feel vindicated that he has "won" and got his way, all while screwing the small shareholder and making money for himself and his buddies...because I do think there are some good things being worked on, I just can't fathom us (the small WLSA shareholder) actually profiting substantially from them. This is based on 6 years of history with WLSA So, while I believe there are some good things currently being worked out, when it is all said and done, I think those profitbale projects/businesses will be spun off to Newlook or some other shell. Long story short, I guess what I am saying is that JS defineitly has made money via salary with regards to WLSA.
Thanks for the update zabone. In my opinion, this type of update is the problem than can cause hype and/or bashing.
"There are many exciting things happening right now in many areas. This should be a good month in regards to the progressive success in multiple areas."
What is the definition of "many?" What "things", and what is the criteria for something to be considered exciting. What are the specific areas? Should be a good month? What is the definition of success? What is the probabilty of "should"?
asdfghj,
thank you for providing rational comments as well as links. it is nice to see someone presenting relevant information as it is, good or bad, with no hyping or bashing. i just wanted to say this because i did not see many responses to your posts. keep it up. we are listening.
ya kind of did...
"Talk to me about it tomorrow sunshine... that's all I have to say right now..."
that is where you went wrong chiroman. the only acceptable posts are:
1. WLSA is great
2. It will be out next week
3. JS told me "insert either of the above 2 comments"
4. If you don't like it, then sell your shares
anythig else and you will be considered an "enemy of the state." your post will either be deleted or you will receive a snotty remark that tries to discredit anything you said by shifting attention to something more trivial by referencing any of the above comments.
Thanks Brad.
Sorry. I forgot who I was talking to, Oh Omnipotent One.
Does anyone else care to comment on stock surf's post? Unlike some, I don't assume to know everything about everything and everyone, and I would value other people's opinion on this matter. Thanks.
Really? So eveyone in the world who asks questions about their investment is planning a lawsuit? So you assume that you know everybody's intentions. Well, I guess you should know that with that name, god. Just by the fact you chose that as a screen name tells people that there is no possible way a 2 sided converstaion can take place when you are involved. In your mind, you will always be right, and everyone else will always be wrong. If they do present something of substance, you will just assume that they are simply trying to plan a lawsuit so you don't have to listen to what they have to say, and you are right again.
So I ask again, if nothing that stocksurf said has any merit, then prove it to me. He was asked to "prove" and validate his first post, and he did. So now I ask YOU to prove your theory that he is trying to form a lawsuit. I will patiently be waiting for the links that validiate your previous post. Thanks.
Does anyone care to comment on the actual questions posed by stock surf, rather than insinuating that he doesn't know what he is talking about because is screenname is new, or telling him to sell his shares? Thanks.
thank you chiroman.
dumar, please correct me if i am wrong, but i did't think we "owned" the land? it is leased? a lease is much easier to break, and the associated timeframe is also much less; e.g. if you own it, you own it until you sell it, but if leased, is only for a shorter specified period of time. a leased land agreement is less "set in stone" as a purchase of the land. even with that being stated, i have personally not been as bullish about WLSA in a very, very long time.
Hopefully i am wrong. if we do own the land, that speaks volumes about the confidence of mgt in the direction of WLSA.
sun, i have probably been more supportive than most when it comes to your posts. but, putting the past behind us, my opinion is that things have not looked this good in quite some time. i may not personally be as confident as some on this board, but come on...you can't see at least some positives from the past two weeks? some of us have been burned in the past but that is no reason to stop you from making money in the future.
left side are the bids. right side, the offers (ask). inside, or L1 quote is made up of highest bid, lowest ask, which is why the L2 quotes are sorted that way. but, they have to "qualify" in order to be considered to hit the L1. one of the rules is that MMs have to display at least 5000 on either side for pink sheets that trade at this price level. this is why you see "50" next to basically all of them (its scaled, 50 = 5000). its required. which is also why it makes it useless. most MMs just display 50 to adhere to the rule, but you never really know just how much volume is behind anything because they all just show 50.
just went to .06 as soon as i posted
seeing .084 on the L1 ask in pre market quoting. that would be nice...
Hmmm. Try now. Thanks.
Thanks for the update Dumar. If this is so locked down, how do you know? Did John tell you this? To be honest, I have not gotten off my but to call John so I can't complain, but, I am just curious as to how you know this.
If you knw Port Hope is not in the top 5, what are the top 5 projects? Thanks.
thanks for the update asdfghj. fingers crossed.
cancune, can you please post the email address you have been using. thank you.
can you define "lately"? over the past 3 years, the only time JS is not tight lipped is when he is blaming others (saktel) for the misfortunes of WLSA. I hope there is somethig coming soon, but "i'll believe it when i see it". GLTA.
but how does all of this benefit WLSA? again, its a complicated web of multiple companies all led by JS. right now, all i see is NLI is in the Plasma Gasification business, and we have become garbage men.
dont worry asdfgh, i have been accused of being a market maker who is manipulating the stock price...trying to keep the stock price down so i can accumulate shares prior to the WLSA explosion.
i am slightly pleased with the latest announcements though. it is better than complete silence.
well, to be fair, msg 2105 did say 1/29.
what was the excuse 2 weeks ago? oh, right...JS did not want to reward the tax sellers by issuing PRs and driving the stock price up prior to January 1st. well, its 2 weeks into the new year and it seems JS has been very busy. he has been busy closing the deal for REM. this is a no brainer!
harley. if you are looking for your transaction on any 3rd party vendor like yahoo or any website, there is a contractual agreement with their provider (bloomberg for example)as well as the exchange that states a predefined delay in data transmission must be applied. delayed data costs less for the site. also, if you had free real time data avaiable to you, why would anyone pay thousands of dollars a month for any one of the real time products offered by the many financial data vendors around...
do you think JS lost the $100,000 deposit?