Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
NAK is sinking. That's what it does best.
Cheers
Oh yes, support polluting and poisoning your environment for a couple bucks. That sounds completely logical.
STRONG SELL
Can you hear me now?
STRONG SELL!
Cheers
Can you hear me now?
Strong sell to zero. Watch and learn rookies.
Cheers
If you believe Mr Briscoe is a liar, if you believe you have ample evidence to support your claim. Why not file a lawsuit? class action maybe?
It doesn't make sense to complain to a message board of people who can't do anything to help your "cause", or disagree with your perspective.
File a lawsuit. You will quickly find out if you have legal standing to proceed IMO.
"case closed".
So simply have Burke send you written confirmation you can present as part of your thesis.
This is not that difficult of an argument to make i would assume.
Honestly, some just seem frustrated and confused. Maybe giving in to mania and hallucinations of all sorts, with bad logic abounding.
I'm no Briscoe lover, but calling someone a liar is mighty strong words where i'm from, you better be able to back it up, or you will surely lose all credibility.
You have said Briscoe is a "liar".
Do you have written evidence to substantiate your character attack on that salient point?
Traditionally, the onus is on the one who makes the claim, to show evidence for their argument.
Do you have evidence in what you are claiming?
Do you have written proof you can present?
Thanks
I've called Briscoe a lot of things over the years, i'm not one to defend his actions in general. I don't believe I have ever called him a liar. That's a pretty strong and detrimental character attack IMO.
Incompetent at business? sure.Terrible at PR? Absolutely. Liar? I don't think that's a fair assumption.
Still a long pony ride here..but she's peaking lovely.
Nice move, news pending.
GLTA
PUMP AND DUMP, NOTHING NEW. SOMEONE PLEASE SHOW OL' BRISCOE TO THE ALZHEIMER'S WARD.
Push away from the NAK ticker screen, go boating. Nothing major happening here anytime soon. Enjoy your weekend.
NAK Shorts are your best friends. They are in fact helping your long term investment. Never mind the temporary pps gyrations.
GLTU
STRONG BUY
We are now long NAK.
GOOD LUCK TO ALL.
1 YEAR DAILY TELLS THE TRUTH..$1.00 ON THE WAY.
NOT GOOD:
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/AMEX/northern-dynasty-mnl-NAK/chart
Below $1.00 in July IMO. No partner, no future.
STRONG SELL.
Useless meeting, disappointing news after meeting imo. This junk seeing red trajectory, GET USED TO IT.
STRONG SELL
They will expire worthless like all the others.
STRONG SELL.
Another reason to strong sell this junk:
Guru Score: 40%
PRICE/SALES RATIO: [FAIL]
The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. However, NAK's P/S is not available which means an opinion cannot be rendered at the present time on this variable. This is the most important variable according to this methodology, and therefore the remainder of the analysis will be provided for informational purposes.
TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: [PASS]
Less debt equals less risk according to this methodology. NAK's Debt/Equity of 0.00% is exceptional, thus passing the test.
PRICE/RESEARCH RATIO: [PASS]
This methodology considers companies in the Technology and Medical sectors to be attractive if they have low Price/Research ratios. NAK is neither a Technology nor Medical company. Therefore the Price/Research ratio is not available and, hence, not much emphasis should be placed on this particular variable.
PRELIMINARY GRADE: No Interest in NAK At this Point
Is NAK a "Super Stock"? NO
LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH RATE: [FAIL]
This methodology looks for companies that have an inflation adjusted EPS growth rate greater than 15%. NAK's inflation adjusted EPS growth rate is not available. Hence, this methodology cannot analyze this criterion at the present time.
FREE CASH PER SHARE: [FAIL]
This methodology looks for companies that have a positive free cash per share. Companies should have enough free cash available to sustain three years of losses. This is based on the premise that companies without cash will soon be out of business. NAK's free cash per share of -0.07 fails this criterion.
THREE YEAR AVERAGE NET PROFIT MARGIN: [FAIL]
This methodology looks for companies that have an average net profit margin of 5% or greater over a three year period. NAK's three year net profit margin, which averages 0.00%, does not pass this criterion.
NAK HOLDERS ABOUT TO GET TAKEN TO GET FLEECED.
Let the absurd golden parachute compensation packages begin.
STRONG SELL
NAK going nowhere without news. Technical data is irrelevant at this point, unless looking for an ill advised entry or preferably a sell point.
STRONG SELL
Nothing in this chart agrees with your wild assumptions about "Exploding". It appears more aligned with IMPLOSION.
STRONG SELL
PROP TRADING.
NAK=STRONG SELL
A little bit more patience will save $1.00 off price.
STRONG SELL
NAK PEBBLE GRAVEYARD.
STRONG SELL
The current NAK situation is:
1.NO current partner, so no future.. as reflected in the current state of trading...relative to disappointment in EPA ruling not sky-rocketing stock.
Future potential state:
1.IF partnership is announced, will see temporary bounce..then followed by protracted period of pps retraction.. due to prolonged process of permitting and eventual mining extraction. NOT WITHSTANDING LEGAL OPPOSITON EFFECT ON PPS.
Most "retail" are not prepared for this extended timetable imo and will see negative pps trend lines far into the future.
Both potential and abject realties are mutually exclusive.
STRONG SELL
There are always too sides to any discussion. The same could be said about the unending NAK rose-colored positivity.
NO PARTNER NO FUTURE
STRONG SELL
"The price will continue in its uptrend, despite the hyper bearish hypotheticals."
What FACTS are supporting these assumptions?
Serious investment dictates the preponderances of alternative view points and outcomes.
IMO..NAK has "potentiality", not unlike many other miners.
However there are serious risks involved here, ignoring those would be irresponsible in terms of accumulation of hope and idealism.
STRONG SELL
I'm not sure what the question is. My sentiment has remained, STRONG SELL. Markets are known to be irrational.
When and IF a partner is ever announced. A few days of exuberance, then quickly followed by years of waiting and waiting.
Thinking NAK will go to the moon on partner announcement will once again prove to be a false hope imo.
What happens when enormous legal opposition is mounted? A couple of hours of trading activity today proves nothing.
If anything, it's a wait and see pattern..a LONGGGG...LONGGG wait and see.
Too much risk, too much time, too much opposition.
STRONG SELL.
Enviro lawsuits my friend. Its naive to believe NAK has smooth sailing because EPA has granted the way forward for permitting.
STRONG SELL
You only need ONE good lawsuit. Law is a multiplier.
STRONG SELL
Serious crash and burn potential on tap..it will be a massacre on the tape imo.
All stops getting violated. Reality sinking in.
PROTECT WHAT LITTLE NAK GAINS WERE EARNED.
STRONG SELL
The same reason why there is confusion as to why such high short ratio. lol
STRONG SELL!!
NAK=Strong buy if 85 years timeline is not toO long to wait.
STRONG SELL
Oh please, the infamous "paid pump article" peppered with troubling disclaimers regarding potential conflict of interest.
NAK INVESTORS were expecting significant share appreciation on EPA positive ruling..well..that was a dud.
Strong sell
You have any idea how expensive that is?? Do you see how much cash on hand they have remaining??
ENORMOUS DILUTION would be needed to attempt.
THEN HOW ABOUT COST OF FIGHTING BACK ANY REMAINING LEGAL OPPOSITIONS??...my friend I think there is a lot of underestimating going on here on the long bet.
What would the institutionals think of NAK diluting to absurd levels??
Just because some are not onboard the long train, does not mean no DD was done.
You are suggestion as a fact that without a partner, NAK will remain a going concern and can proceed on it's own????
oh boy.