Switch to optionsXpress for advanced derivatives trading & earn 50 commission-free trades.
SureTrader Stock Hero Advertisement SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, dmiller, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967
Search This Board:
Last Post: 3/27/2015 11:12:28 PM - Followers: 828 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0


About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
Option Chain for IDCC
IDCC News: InterDigital to Sponsor IEEE ComSoc Small Cells Webinar 03/24/2015 02:00:00 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital Secures Milestone 5GPPP Project Win 03/24/2015 08:00:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital to Present at First Cambridge Wireless Technology Engineering Conference 03/23/2015 08:00:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 03/17/2015 05:10:18 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 03/17/2015 05:03:49 PM
#397709  Sticky Note Please post this to sticky notes... bulldzr 03/27/15 09:31:26 PM
#393361  Sticky Note Upcoming 'legal' events for Interdigital as I see FISH21049 12/08/14 10:26:16 AM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#397710   "Judge, We at Interdigital are not the Problem" eom. zombywolf 03/27/15 11:12:28 PM
#397709   Please post this to sticky notes... bulldzr 03/27/15 09:31:26 PM
#397708   Bull,you're 100% correct. Not a very wise decision MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 09:02:25 PM
#397707   Well, first of all, that website is not bulldzr 03/27/15 08:29:24 PM
#397706   Intel in Talks to Buy Altera magillagorilla 03/27/15 08:27:19 PM
#397705   A word of caution, I like the petition Turney 03/27/15 07:55:05 PM
#397704   Will do. lando1 03/27/15 06:36:39 PM
#397703   Thanks Zomby and Lando, that's good, but I bulldzr 03/27/15 06:29:24 PM
#397702   The Judge is pushing for a settlement. bulldzr 03/27/15 06:21:41 PM
#397701   IDCC lost a motion filed earlier this week olddog967 03/27/15 05:54:03 PM
#397700   I'm in, signed. eom. zombywolf 03/27/15 05:18:09 PM
#397699   Signed and sent by all in our household. lando1 03/27/15 04:55:43 PM
#397698   Just my opinion!!!! mickeybritt 03/27/15 04:52:15 PM
#397697   Thank you for that bulldzr triangle 03/27/15 04:06:58 PM
#397696   I read that but Im not convinced. triangle 03/27/15 03:48:12 PM
#397695   NO ONE?? NO EXPLANATION?? triangle 03/27/15 03:42:52 PM
#397694   Triangle, I think sab gave a pretty believable bulldzr 03/27/15 03:41:51 PM
#397693   So here we are again. Few days ago triangle 03/27/15 03:24:27 PM
#397692   I signed it also.Been in macc14 03/27/15 03:18:39 PM
#397691   Good, it is important to send the emails bulldzr 03/27/15 03:11:05 PM
#397690   Signed and sent to Congressional members. eagle-i13 03/27/15 02:52:32 PM
#397689   Signed it. pochemunyet 03/27/15 02:42:12 PM
#397688   hopefully everyone will sign it. MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 02:36:54 PM
#397687   Signed it also triangle 03/27/15 02:29:26 PM
#397686   Thanks clamcakes, folks don't have to wait for bulldzr 03/27/15 01:02:05 PM
#397685   How to stop the "bleeding"...??! jeffree 03/27/15 01:01:09 PM
#397684   Got one this morning. Signed. clamcakes 03/27/15 12:26:48 PM
#397683   Rather than leave it to the parties to gatticaa 03/27/15 12:18:41 PM
#397682   I signed it also. MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 12:07:02 PM
#397681   Sounds like a good cause. I signed bulldzr 03/27/15 12:04:16 PM
#397680   so have I. MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 11:26:11 AM
#397679   On a related issue... has anybody else received bulldzr 03/27/15 11:06:10 AM
#397678   Thanks Data. Yep, I found the exact Gungrey 03/27/15 11:01:01 AM
#397677   eagle, I had the same thought about maybe my3sons87 03/27/15 10:44:37 AM
#397676   Thanks Gun, just downloaded it. MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 10:44:23 AM
#397675   ot: you can ask questions about popups, etc here: Data_Rox 03/27/15 10:44:11 AM
#397674   IDCC and Qualcomm should join forces on this eagle-i13 03/27/15 10:39:04 AM
#397673   Bill Merritt wonderful letter stating the IDCC position my3sons87 03/27/15 10:36:19 AM
#397672   https://adblockplus.org/ Ad Block Plus Hope this helps, Gungrey 03/27/15 10:32:05 AM
#397671   'Terrified' Fed. Circ. Will Follow High Court, Michel Says Paullee 03/27/15 10:28:02 AM
#397670   GUN, yes it did start in the last MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 09:58:36 AM
#397669   Jim, yes I just did the test and Gungrey 03/27/15 09:42:06 AM
#397668   It doesn't happen on my IMac, just the Gungrey 03/27/15 09:40:43 AM
#397667   Gungrey, Make sure adblock is enabled. JimLur 03/27/15 09:13:03 AM
#397666   on both my mac and iPad. MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 09:05:55 AM
#397665   Just curious if anyone else has noticed Gungrey 03/27/15 08:55:53 AM
#397664   Way to go uncle Billy. Now, if Gungrey 03/27/15 08:50:12 AM
#397663   I think it's a good thing IDCC is redviking 03/27/15 07:45:46 AM
#397662   Why We Disagree with the IEEE's Patent Policy dndodd 03/27/15 07:25:54 AM
#397661   Explores “Smart City & Smart World” Innovations from dndodd 03/27/15 06:02:25 AM