Vector VestAdvertisement SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, dmiller, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967
Search This Board:
Last Post: 1/26/2015 5:11:27 PM - Followers: 827 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 48

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
Option Chain for IDCC
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Date for Fourth Quarter 2014 Financial Results 04:30 PM
IDCC News: Evidentiary Hearing in ITC Remand of Nokia/Microsoft Mobile Investigation Commences 09:40 AM
IDCC News: Amended Statement of Ownership (sc 13g/a) 01/22/2015 02:26:04 PM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 01/21/2015 04:31:39 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 01/20/2015 04:48:27 PM
News News Alert: InterDigital Announces Date for Fourth Quarter 2014 Financial Results 01/26/2015 04:30:00 PM
#393361  Sticky Note Upcoming 'legal' events for Interdigital as I see FISH21049 12/08/14 10:26:16 AM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#394999   The Teva vs Sandoz decision would seem to zombywolf 01/26/15 05:18:16 PM
#394998   Good article on Teva loophole73 01/26/15 05:17:04 PM
#394997   Are Nokia/Microsoft saying the Supreme Court has removed redviking 01/26/15 05:11:26 PM
#394996   InterDigital Announces Date for Fourth Quarter 2014 Financial Results Gamco 01/26/15 04:43:46 PM
#394995   I can go to DC to the USITC, lockworld 01/26/15 04:40:59 PM
#394994   Nokia/Microsoft submitted a motion that the recent olddog967 01/26/15 04:38:32 PM
#394993   not much time for smoke and mirrors by gejebr3 01/26/15 04:37:27 PM
#394992   ITC, Hey guys gotta admit very impressed with the sonic22 01/26/15 04:29:33 PM
#394991   Mickey Give me a call at 210-493-7991.....Gene biggeneg7 01/26/15 04:24:54 PM
#394990   we have been Conditioned to expect a "bad something"...but jeffree 01/26/15 04:23:26 PM
#394989   jjff: The schedule called for 5 days, olddog967 01/26/15 04:11:16 PM
#394988   Paullee Got to love they erred in the didn't mickeybritt 01/26/15 04:09:32 PM
#394987   Do you have any idea how long this jjff 01/26/15 04:07:03 PM
#394986   Paullee: Very similar to the announcement olddog967 01/26/15 03:40:52 PM
#394985   Don't you just love this. A note Paullee 01/26/15 03:26:25 PM
#394984   Wow is no one at the hearing????? mickeybritt 01/26/15 03:12:06 PM
#394983   I guess the short sellers don't have any my3sons87 01/26/15 02:50:20 PM
#394982   Sorry Squinge 2 post below me I'm brain dead! jjff 01/26/15 02:22:15 PM
#394981   Worst case scenerio the hearing is delayed by FISH21049 01/26/15 01:41:39 PM
#394980   Where the heck is the volume? mickeybritt 01/26/15 01:17:39 PM
#394979   L.G. From what I have read so far things mickeybritt 01/26/15 12:51:07 PM
#394978   Washington DC should have very little to no chill 01/26/15 12:49:22 PM
#394977   Hopefully, this snow storm will not stop the longinvestor_98 01/26/15 12:28:23 PM
#394976   Stream Optimization Vendors Make Big Claims About Reducing dndodd 01/26/15 12:24:17 PM
#394975   O'dog the Domestic Industry was not appealable in my3sons87 01/26/15 11:50:26 AM
#394974   (Reuters) - South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co Ltd JohnSamuel 01/26/15 11:50:08 AM
#394973   Maybe Squingebob made it to the hearing! jjff 01/26/15 11:30:49 AM
#394972   Scooby: Reminds me of how to have a million sailfreeee 01/26/15 11:12:28 AM
#394971   Nice to see IDCC stand up in public. squingeqbob 01/26/15 10:58:13 AM
#394970   2015 used to seem far, far away. Not anymore! squingeqbob 01/26/15 10:56:01 AM
#394969   I still don't trust the itc. But i'm MJPLIFE11 01/26/15 10:55:06 AM
#394968   the day is young - this is really gejebr3 01/26/15 10:47:33 AM
#394967   Jim: ALJ's final initial determination scheduled for no olddog967 01/26/15 10:44:41 AM
#394966   Scooby, IDCC=Rodney Dangerfield of stocks Gungrey 01/26/15 10:40:45 AM
#394965   zombywolf: Different staff attorney and a favorable olddog967 01/26/15 10:39:45 AM
#394964   I don't think I will ever understand the scooby5 01/26/15 10:38:56 AM
#394963   olddog, Any idea when we might get the JimLur 01/26/15 10:34:03 AM
#394962   What happened between the original ITC hearing and now? zombywolf 01/26/15 10:30:05 AM
#394961   Noted that there was no mention of "domestic olddog967 01/26/15 10:27:11 AM
#394960   Yep, good sign for our little flea.....however, we Gungrey 01/26/15 10:21:43 AM
#394959   Now we need the ALJ to come to my3sons87 01/26/15 10:14:21 AM
#394958   This is very good to see: LTE 01/26/15 10:07:03 AM
#394957   The Staff therefore recommends that the Administrative Law redviking 01/26/15 10:00:02 AM
#394956   First time the Staff Attorney has been on olddog967 01/26/15 09:53:31 AM
#394955   sounds pretty straight forward, so what obstacles will Paullee 01/26/15 09:51:22 AM
#394954   Evidentiary Hearing in ITC Remand of Nokia/Microsoft Mobile Hydro_gen 01/26/15 09:44:27 AM
#394953   I wonder if the markets will be closed Gungrey 01/26/15 09:24:15 AM
#394952   USITC Address: 500 E Street SW Washington, DC 20436 my3sons87 01/26/15 07:06:05 AM
#394951   Hopefully the DC area will be to warm my3sons87 01/25/15 11:12:05 PM
#394950   "Never happen. Patents too valuable to U. S." patopinion 01/25/15 09:03:15 PM