Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, dmiller, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967
Search This Board:
Last Post: 12/19/2014 7:33:44 PM - Followers: 828 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 99

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
Option Chain for IDCC
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 04:23 PM
IDCC News: Successful Year for InterDigital's Innovation Partners 12/15/2014 09:00:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital's Innovation Partners Enters Into Research Agreement With Germany's IfU 12/15/2014 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Principal Engineer Named IEEE Fellow 12/12/2014 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 11/13/2014 04:45:14 PM
News News Alert: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 12/19/2014 04:23:47 PM
#393361  Sticky Note Upcoming 'legal' events for Interdigital as I see FISH21049 12/08/14 10:26:16 AM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#393900   Profit From Innovation dndodd 12/19/14 07:33:44 PM
#393899   You're not going anywhere and that's an order. squingeqbob 12/19/14 07:24:32 PM
#393898   bulldzr Thanks but I have already hit it big. mickeybritt 12/19/14 06:41:17 PM
#393897   true ... AAPL had HUGE numbers traded AH ... JohnSamuel 12/19/14 06:35:00 PM
#393896   Mickey, "I may be wrong but I told bulldzr 12/19/14 06:24:09 PM
#393895   JimLur... I agree. You are the one bulldzr 12/19/14 05:57:40 PM
#393894   we've moved up about 10 points since the gejebr3 12/19/14 05:49:24 PM
#393893   Today's total volume traded now stands at Gamco 12/19/14 05:47:07 PM
#393892   gungrey - correct Data_Rox 12/19/14 05:44:58 PM
#393891   Good for you Mickey JimLur 12/19/14 05:41:50 PM
#393890   Data, if I'm not mistaken, you have to Gungrey 12/19/14 05:36:55 PM
#393889   Bulldzr, A while ago when Heartland owned a JimLur 12/19/14 05:33:50 PM
#393888   Makes me think most of the late trades Gungrey 12/19/14 05:32:26 PM
#393887   It wasn't just Idcc, it was many stocks. MJPLIFE11 12/19/14 05:30:02 PM
#393886   Mick, you might be correct if this trading jist1 12/19/14 05:28:12 PM
#393885   Bulldzr How true about along for the ride but mickeybritt 12/19/14 05:26:36 PM
#393884   mj, no doubt that rebalancing was done. jist1 12/19/14 05:25:32 PM
#393883   JimLur How many poor old country boys with no mickeybritt 12/19/14 05:23:27 PM
#393882   I believe there was a rebalancing at the MJPLIFE11 12/19/14 05:22:38 PM
#393881   ot: bulldozr Data_Rox 12/19/14 05:22:24 PM
#393880   doc, Yep, maybe those guys in that jist1 12/19/14 05:22:07 PM
#393879   Thanks mickey... as I said I am no bulldzr 12/19/14 05:20:42 PM
#393877   Just want to say that there were no olddog967 12/19/14 05:17:16 PM
#393876   The trading seems unusual even for after hours trading. doctor d 12/19/14 05:15:55 PM
#393875   Probably correct on covering the calls... that's how bulldzr 12/19/14 05:15:31 PM
#393874   Bulldzr Read your post carefully you said they was mickeybritt 12/19/14 05:14:30 PM
#393873   If you are ever interested in selling one, bulldzr 12/19/14 05:06:50 PM
#393872   you cover my calls and I'll cover your Limejuice22 12/19/14 05:05:50 PM
#393871   I am surely no expert, but doesn't this bulldzr 12/19/14 05:01:05 PM
#393870   And their value has increased dramatically over the Gungrey 12/19/14 05:00:10 PM
#393869   Good on ya, Mickey. I recall Gungrey 12/19/14 04:52:23 PM
#393868   Meanwhile the after hours volume keeps growing 312k dndodd 12/19/14 04:43:12 PM
#393867   BM gifted some shares and sold some shares dndodd 12/19/14 04:41:41 PM
#393866   Gen. George S. Patton, "The greatest battle implement bulldzr 12/19/14 04:33:07 PM
#393865   1999 is still very fresh in my mind. dws 12/19/14 04:31:31 PM
#393864   Total Volume for the tradidg day (including pre Gamco 12/19/14 04:30:56 PM
#393863   I hope you're right that something's up. I'm WayHaw 12/19/14 04:29:37 PM
#393862   Big blocks still coming across. doctor d 12/19/14 04:29:29 PM
#393861   It looked like a block on E*Trade, but redviking 12/19/14 04:29:19 PM
#393860   JimLur I think you are right as I posted mickeybritt 12/19/14 04:20:07 PM
#393859   According to TDAmeritrade, 533,635 shares were bought at $53.75 JohnSamuel 12/19/14 04:20:01 PM
#393858   Hard to accept that reasoning if you were dws 12/19/14 04:19:20 PM
#393857   IMO, just adjusting to where we should have WayHaw 12/19/14 04:13:39 PM
#393856   alalud, This might just be some short covering?? JimLur 12/19/14 04:12:08 PM
#393855   Too bad they didn't have music videos in bulldzr 12/19/14 04:11:58 PM
#393854   TDAmeritrade @thinkorswim shows: 15:00:00 CST 53.75 485,605 JohnSamuel 12/19/14 04:11:58 PM
#393853   redviking, Looking at the NASDAQ trades, I didn't FISH21049 12/19/14 04:08:56 PM
#393852   dws, I agree. JimLur 12/19/14 04:08:51 PM
#393851   NASDAQ Last Sale (NLS) Intraday Trade History: Gamco 12/19/14 04:07:27 PM
#393850   700000 in last hour alone! Does someone know alalud 12/19/14 04:06:30 PM