SPDR Advertisement SureTrader SureTrader SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, dmiller, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967
Search This Board:
Last Post: 7/7/2015 11:34:35 AM - Followers: 829 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 15


About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
Option Chain for IDCC
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/02/2015 04:11:12 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/02/2015 04:05:58 PM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 06/30/2015 04:42:55 PM
IDCC News: Annual Report of Employee Stock Plans (11-k) 06/29/2015 01:53:13 PM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 06/26/2015 04:12:15 PM
#393361  Sticky Note Upcoming 'legal' events for Interdigital as I see FISH21049 12/08/14 10:26:16 AM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#401163   the Next options date of significance is September... jeffree 07/07/15 11:34:35 AM
#401162   Looks like One step forward & one step hrbart 07/07/15 10:55:49 AM
#401161   olddog, thanks for clarifying. FISH21049 07/07/15 10:35:10 AM
#401160   United States Patent 9,077,424 Gamco 07/07/15 10:14:02 AM
#401159   United States Patent 9,078,117 Gamco 07/07/15 10:13:22 AM
#401158   United States Patent 9,078,158 Gamco 07/07/15 10:12:46 AM
#401157   United States Patent 9,078,195 Gamco 07/07/15 10:12:14 AM
#401156   United States Patent 9,078,279 Gamco 07/07/15 10:11:30 AM
#401155   Hydro, MSFT got exactly what they deserved from my3sons87 07/07/15 09:13:20 AM
#401154   my3sons87 - after all is said and done Hydro_gen 07/07/15 08:31:33 AM
#401153   Fish, it does not appear that MSFT got my3sons87 07/07/15 07:57:59 AM
#401152   Fish: Based on the following information, it would olddog967 07/07/15 07:24:56 AM
#401151   Samsung sales fall 8.4% in Q2 dndodd 07/07/15 06:57:59 AM
#401150   FISH Like I have said and Microsoft confirms it mickeybritt 07/07/15 06:46:40 AM
#401149   m3s, from Microsoft's financial statements from June 30, 2014: FISH21049 07/07/15 12:46:25 AM
#401148   m3s, No, I can't show where Microsoft withheld FISH21049 07/06/15 10:38:08 PM
#401147   Fish can you post something from MSFT that my3sons87 07/06/15 10:05:13 PM
#401146   M3S, my comment Microsoft got tons of money, FISH21049 07/06/15 10:02:53 PM
#401145   For anyone interested, here is the note term olddog967 07/06/15 06:26:19 PM
#401144   dndodd: As you previously posted IDCC this year olddog967 07/06/15 06:12:38 PM
#401143   Appreciate your thoughts. JimLur 07/06/15 06:12:32 PM
#401142   I confess ignorance too. dndodd 07/06/15 05:55:25 PM
#401141   OD, I must confess to being pretty ignorant redviking 07/06/15 05:52:35 PM
#401140   redviking: The conversion price change had nothing olddog967 07/06/15 05:35:07 PM
#401139   From today's press release... Monterey2000 07/06/15 05:31:31 PM
#401138   So the haircut we suffered on Thursday helped redviking 07/06/15 04:52:19 PM
#401137   Hey Fish, "Bottom line, a $75 price tax hrbart 07/06/15 04:45:51 PM
#401136   Note that a contingent liability provision is an Rakitno 07/06/15 04:38:36 PM
#401135   Does this mean we are getting close to dndodd 07/06/15 04:34:40 PM
#401134   InterDigital Announces Conversion Rate Adjustment to 2.50% Senior dndodd 07/06/15 04:31:55 PM
#401133   Internet of Everything – The Real 5G Challenge? dndodd 07/06/15 04:11:48 PM
#401131   Jim: As I have written before, Nokia olddog967 07/06/15 04:02:30 PM
#401129   m3s, Maybe he's thinking about the money Nokia JimLur 07/06/15 03:39:44 PM
#401128   Fish check your facts. As I recall MSFT my3sons87 07/06/15 03:27:08 PM
#401127   I think you're right. It's just the price robertc1 07/06/15 03:20:08 PM
#401126   I would have said "sumtin's up" were it la-idcc-fan 07/06/15 03:03:11 PM
#401125   I am shocked that nobody has said "sumting's up" sailfreeee 07/06/15 03:01:06 PM
#401124   5G networks look to new frequencies to deliver dndodd 07/06/15 02:49:43 PM
#401123   ACE WG A. Rahman dndodd 07/06/15 02:36:18 PM
#401122   Nice price action today and thanks! squingeqbob 07/06/15 02:27:56 PM
#401121   IMO, IDCC strong in the down market today..EOM orientbull 07/06/15 02:27:05 PM
#401120   Fish... "so why doesn't Microsoft settle with IDCC?" bulldzr 07/06/15 02:11:02 PM
#401119   Let's try to figure this out: FISH21049 07/06/15 01:56:50 PM
#401118   Gamco, so why doesn't Microsoft settle with IDCC? FISH21049 07/06/15 01:42:39 PM
#401117   Microsoft buries hatchet with Kyocera, ending litigation Gamco 07/06/15 12:32:36 PM
#401115   I almost guarantee... jeffree 07/06/15 12:00:52 PM
#401114   Gungrey, As I've mentioned many times. I jist1 07/06/15 11:48:05 AM
#401113   Well, I don't subscribe to your "doom & Gungrey 07/06/15 11:35:03 AM
#401112   Interview with Bob DiFazio, Chief Engineer, InterDigital dndodd 07/06/15 11:17:25 AM
#401109   No use complaining in advance...but jeffree 07/06/15 10:56:27 AM