Interactive Brokers Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dndodd, loophole73, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 6/23/2017 5:29:32 PM - Followers: 856 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Conversion Rate Adjustment to 1.50% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2020 06/21/2017 05:14:24 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital CEO: Senator Coons’ Stronger Act “Works to Strengthen American Innovation” 06/21/2017 12:20:00 PM
IDCC News: European Industrial and Academic Partners Join to Develop a 5G Mobile Transport Platform for Verticals 06/21/2017 03:30:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/16/2017 04:43:03 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/16/2017 04:40:02 PM
#417924   Gamco: The clause you site is one of olddog967 06/23/17 05:29:32 PM
#417923   The updated note conversion rate implies an IDCC Gamco 06/23/17 03:19:17 PM
#417922   To what? All thoughts appreciated! jjff 06/23/17 03:09:47 PM
#417921   olddog and LTE: Just 1 week AFTER FISH21049 06/23/17 02:54:27 PM
#417920   Gamco: As you say there is olddog967 06/23/17 02:29:59 PM
#417919   I wonder why IDCC provided the 6/21/2017 update Gamco 06/23/17 01:45:41 PM
#417918   <<<<The notes will be convertible at an initial LTE 06/23/17 01:41:15 PM
#417917   "about to pop"...??? jeffree 06/23/17 01:40:21 PM
#417916   LTE: I think the following is IDCC's previous FISH21049 06/23/17 01:18:23 PM
#417915   I wondered how long it would take for IDCCfan 06/23/17 01:04:43 PM
#417914   mmbtx_1, thanks for the info: LTE 06/23/17 12:56:31 PM
#417913   The Latest SEP Developments In China Paullee 06/23/17 08:14:05 AM
#417912   Paullee between that senate and congress bill and my3sons87 06/22/17 06:54:22 PM
#417911   Sens. Aim To Make Big PTAB, Court Changes Paullee 06/22/17 04:06:40 PM
#417910   Qualcomm fires back, says Apple charges more for Gamco 06/22/17 09:54:45 AM
#417909   jeffree: Here are some comments on the olddog967 06/21/17 10:25:05 PM
#417908   Ok accountants...time for some serious analysis...!!? jeffree 06/21/17 07:44:50 PM
#417907   InterDigital Announces Conversion Rate Adjustment to 1.50% Senior mmbtx_1 06/21/17 05:27:16 PM
#417906   IMO, I think the company is currently undergoing orientbull 06/21/17 03:24:01 PM
#417905   IMO,considering IDCC's strategy of creating a living network, orientbull 06/21/17 02:22:18 PM
#417904   IMO, this is my first time to watch orientbull 06/21/17 01:47:24 PM
#417903   Well, hopefully in the current political environment, there tnyellowtomcat 06/21/17 12:37:00 PM
#417902 dilt1 06/21/17 12:30:18 PM
#417901   No news, no volume, no interest! jjff 06/21/17 12:25:16 PM
#417900   Summer malaise...???...or summer surprise...??! jeffree 06/21/17 12:14:03 PM
#417899   OOPS! I meant IDCC has a higher forward la-idcc-fan 06/21/17 12:02:02 PM
#417898   Interestingly, the ONLY equity is my portfolio that la-idcc-fan 06/21/17 11:20:15 AM
#417897   I use Yahoo's "MY PORTFOLIO" to track my la-idcc-fan 06/21/17 11:04:45 AM
#417896   European Industrial and Academic Partners Join to Develop pochemunyet 06/21/17 10:57:34 AM
#417895   FWIW...July and Aug call option activities around 82.5 orientbull 06/21/17 10:34:49 AM
#417894   European Industrial and Academic Partners Join to Develop Gamco 06/21/17 09:11:41 AM
#417893   Apple Attacks Qualcomm's Business Model In Chip Suit Paullee 06/20/17 07:19:31 PM
#417892   Another use of Iot? lando1 06/20/17 03:59:43 PM
#417891   Apple Says Qualcomm Has Overcharged Billions of Dollars Gamco 06/20/17 01:17:11 PM
#417890   78 - 84 per share until news one clamcakes 06/20/17 01:05:52 PM
#417889   Mickey, Not surprising considering the lackluster conference call last eagle-i13 06/20/17 12:31:43 PM
#417888   Market makers giving the stock away again!!!! mickeybritt 06/20/17 11:37:59 AM
#417887   United States Patent 9,686,713 Gamco 06/20/17 11:17:10 AM
#417886   United States Patent 9,686,635 Gamco 06/20/17 11:16:17 AM
#417885   United States Patent 9,686,707 Gamco 06/20/17 11:15:41 AM
#417884   United States Patent 9,686,721 Gamco 06/20/17 11:15:09 AM
#417883   United States Patent 9,686,771 Gamco 06/20/17 11:14:35 AM
#417882   United States Patent 9,686,801 Gamco 06/20/17 11:14:05 AM
#417881   Apple accuses Qualcomm of double-dipping, wants end to Gamco 06/20/17 10:49:25 AM
#417880   The lack of a presentation of the future FISH21049 06/20/17 10:34:30 AM
#417879   Guessing the short position is already pretty firmly gejebr3 06/20/17 10:26:58 AM
#417878   Over the last 20 years I have observed felix7 06/20/17 10:11:09 AM
#417877   IMO I have also found it odd that orientbull 06/20/17 09:06:21 AM
#417876   olddog, I understand the difference between the two clamcakes 06/20/17 07:55:41 AM
#417875   No like button M6 06/20/17 12:40:31 AM