SureTrader SureTrader
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, Data_Rox, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board:
Last Post: 9/27/2016 7:50:59 PM - Followers: 845 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 29



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
SureTrader
IDCC News: InterDigital Demonstrates Integrated Fronthaul and Backhaul Over Millimeter Wave System 02:30 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Increase of Regular Quarterly Dividend 09/22/2016 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital to Demonstrate Latest in Mobile Edge Computing at MEC World Congress 09/21/2016 02:30:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital IoT Solutions Featured at IIC, TIA Events 09/19/2016 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: Two InterDigital Executives Named to Key Industry Positions 09/15/2016 08:30:00 AM
News News Alert: InterDigital Demonstrates Integrated Fronthaul and Backhaul Over Millimeter Wave System 09/27/2016 02:30:00 AM
PostSubject
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#412131   I don't know if we are going to Turney 09/27/16 09:39:24 PM
#412130   jeffree My opinion is pretty broad but I think mickeybritt 09/27/16 07:50:58 PM
#412129   "it's been such a long time"... jeffree 09/27/16 07:35:01 PM
#412128   From AVANCI.COM la-idcc-fan 09/27/16 05:30:40 PM
#412127   Agree. Climbing so steadily without any sign of tw11 09/27/16 05:11:13 PM
#412126   The LHG arbitration award was confirmed by the my3sons87 09/27/16 04:39:08 PM
#412125   Hopefully we will be getting some movement on my3sons87 09/27/16 04:35:54 PM
#412124   Mickey, the fundamentals are great. ddutta 09/27/16 04:29:12 PM
#412123   ddutta You can officially say when we go a mickeybritt 09/27/16 04:19:34 PM
#412122   dduta: Because of the conversion feature, figuring olddog967 09/27/16 04:17:12 PM
#412121   olddog967, is this calculation correct? ddutta 09/27/16 03:46:33 PM
#412120   Hm. No recent insider selling?... Interesting... pochemunyet 09/27/16 03:35:05 PM
#412119   Thanks olddog967! ddutta 09/27/16 03:19:55 PM
#412118   dduta: Don't know who owns IDCC's convertible olddog967 09/27/16 03:14:38 PM
#412117   Thanks Hydro_Gen. ddutta 09/27/16 02:28:55 PM
#412116   Caveman: Many thanks for your posts and insight. EOM teamsport 09/27/16 02:09:41 PM
#412115   ARTICLE 10 Conversion of Notes SECTION 10.01. Right Hydro_gen 09/27/16 02:09:24 PM
#412114   Questions regarding 2020 convertible debt ($316 million) ddutta 09/27/16 01:18:13 PM
#412113   United States Patent 9,456,376 Gamco 09/27/16 12:47:59 PM
#412112   United States Patent 9,456,428 Gamco 09/27/16 12:47:29 PM
#412111   United States Patent 9,456,321 Gamco 09/27/16 12:45:55 PM
#412110   United States Patent 9,456,372 Gamco 09/27/16 12:45:15 PM
#412109   United States Patent 9,456,449 Gamco 09/27/16 12:44:31 PM
#412108   Cape Canaveral, Fla...Its a Beautiful Sight... jeffree 09/27/16 12:29:43 PM
#412107   Yeah, okay. pochemunyet 09/27/16 11:24:52 AM
#412106   Caveman , Obviously technicals work well as behind we" FanOfspringsteen 09/27/16 10:31:06 AM
#412105   ready for a push into the 80's? gejebr3 09/27/16 10:13:36 AM
#412104   Well-written, well reasoned out post. Thank you. la-idcc-fan 09/27/16 09:31:29 AM
#412103   InterDigital Demonstrates Integrated Fronthaul and Backhaul Over Millimeter FISH21049 09/27/16 05:25:46 AM
#412102   SI Report... jeffree 09/26/16 06:53:06 PM
#412101   OMG! Some you folks are just too funny. Caveman Cooking 09/26/16 06:49:31 PM
#412100   mister I would be after LG like white on mickeybritt 09/26/16 06:43:04 PM
#412099   so this guy Riley just thinks there will mister 09/26/16 06:36:50 PM
#412098   InterDigital Inc. (IDCC) Receives “Equal Weight” Rating from Gamco 09/26/16 02:32:27 PM
#412097   Buying opportunity!!!!!!! mickeybritt 09/26/16 02:00:38 PM
#412096   WOW - What a Neet Hat Trick! tnyellowtomcat 09/26/16 01:03:01 PM
#412095   The stock could not have behaved better than nessco 09/26/16 12:58:45 PM
#412094   If the stock closes green today and the mickeybritt 09/26/16 12:06:55 PM
#412093   My broker say IDCC definitely going higher and squingeqbob 09/26/16 12:00:53 PM
#412092   the drop to 75 this morning was ridiculous. MJPLIFE11 09/26/16 11:59:40 AM
#412091   almost as meaningful as caveman trying to compare gejebr3 09/26/16 11:58:03 AM
#412090   Riley "downgrades" a stock but keeps the target pochemunyet 09/26/16 11:41:12 AM
#412089   I hear you! I hear you! FISH21049 09/26/16 11:31:00 AM
#412088   jeffree It is called screw the shareholders if mickeybritt 09/26/16 11:24:33 AM
#412087   I thank B Riley...for their Timely jeffree 09/26/16 11:16:22 AM
#412083   Is B. Riley trying to make themselves great my3sons87 09/26/16 10:44:53 AM
#412082   UPDATE: B. Riley Downgrades InterDigital Inc. (IDCC) to Neutral Gamco 09/26/16 10:21:37 AM
#412081   M3S: Probably because they wanted to bring the FISH21049 09/26/16 10:18:20 AM
#412080   I see the price action as nothing more WayHaw 09/26/16 10:15:32 AM
#412079   Paullee , why does Riley come to our my3sons87 09/26/16 10:06:31 AM
PostSubject