Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I suppose that the new was presented and taken as a joke; so humorously 🤡
So is the company or the shorts selling since the selling seems sizable enough on a Friday after massive news so who would be selling on life changing news or was that just some bull?
If Bioxytrans has patients on such a Glorious claim all Majors must be taken notice: So possibly buyout or takeover would definitely be involved; if not total conniving Suppression Imo
If Bioxytrans has patients on such a Glorious claim all Majors must be taken notice: So possibly buyout or takeover would definitely be involved; if not total conniving Suppression Imo
USA & CHINA
As they jostle for supremacy in semiconductor chips and green technology, America and China have been locked into an increasingly disruptive game of tit-for-tat trade warfare. They have unleashed a panoply of export controls, tariffs, and blacklisting against one another, and their allies, as a Financial Times series has highlighted. The latest salvo comes from Beijing. From September 15, it will impose export controls on antimony, an obscure metal used in armour-piercing ammunition, night-vision goggles and precision optics. It follows curbs implemented last year on shipments of germanium and gallium, which are needed for chips and military communications. China produces about 60 per cent of rare earth elements, and processes close to 90 per cent. Beijing cites “national security” as the reason for its measures, but its command over essential raw materials is ultimately its leverage over Washington in the trade war. America’s muscle comes from blocking exports of advanced semiconductor technologies to China, and hindering Chinese manufacturers’ ability to sell into its market. The cycle of retaliation has buffeted their economies, and set back global growth and innovation. It shows little sign of cooling. That means adapting to the new era of fragmented supply chains is necessary to cushion the economic fallout. For instance, China’s Huawei has worked with domestic chipmaker SMIC to boost cutting-edge chip development. There are also signs that Chinese buyers are finding ways to circumvent US restrictions on advanced processors. The US and its allies have set up initiatives like the Mineral Security Partnership to improve critical resource collaboration. But such forums need to move quickly from dialogue to action. Businesses fear Beijing will keep adding new critical metals to its restrictions, and are concerned that chip production will suffer under higher prices and without the right inputs. Stepping up mining and refining efforts is key. China dominates both, but there are still significant critical metal reserves outside the country to exploit, including in the west. Nyrstar, owned by commodities trading group Trafigura, reckons a zinc smelter facility in Tennessee could meet 80 per cent of annual US demand for gallium and germanium. Higher commodity prices, on the back of Beijing’s controls, should also make extraction more attractive. But western governments need to make it easier for the industry to operate. Price volatility makes extraction risky, and below-cost exports from China are difficult to compete against. Streamlining onerous planning laws and chemical regulations across countries would help, alongside adopting joint environmental standards. Better co-ordination on financial incentives is also warranted. Price insurance and public-private partnerships can help de-risk projects for the rarest metals, while long-term offtake agreements can provide security of demand. Some critical metals can be costly and hard to recycle or to substitute, but supporting strategic research and development remains important, too. For example, gallium can be extracted from coal fly ash, a waste product from coal combustion. Silicon can also be a less-expensive substitute for germanium in certain electronic applications. For decades, governments in the west lapped up cheap raw materials from China, while Beijing invested heavily in mining, refining and exploration. The economic hostility between the US and China is highlighting just how short-sighted it was to build up dependence on a single supplier of essential metals. China’s command of the sector looks unassailable. But if America and its allies want to dilute its leverage in the trade war, a more concerted effort on critical minerals would help.
USA & CHINA
As they jostle for supremacy in semiconductor chips and green technology, America and China have been locked into an increasingly disruptive game of tit-for-tat trade warfare. They have unleashed a panoply of export controls, tariffs, and blacklisting against one another, and their allies, as a Financial Times series has highlighted. The latest salvo comes from Beijing. From September 15, it will impose export controls on antimony, an obscure metal used in armour-piercing ammunition, night-vision goggles and precision optics. It follows curbs implemented last year on shipments of germanium and gallium, which are needed for chips and military communications. China produces about 60 per cent of rare earth elements, and processes close to 90 per cent. Beijing cites “national security” as the reason for its measures, but its command over essential raw materials is ultimately its leverage over Washington in the trade war. America’s muscle comes from blocking exports of advanced semiconductor technologies to China, and hindering Chinese manufacturers’ ability to sell into its market. The cycle of retaliation has buffeted their economies, and set back global growth and innovation. It shows little sign of cooling. That means adapting to the new era of fragmented supply chains is necessary to cushion the economic fallout. For instance, China’s Huawei has worked with domestic chipmaker SMIC to boost cutting-edge chip development. There are also signs that Chinese buyers are finding ways to circumvent US restrictions on advanced processors. The US and its allies have set up initiatives like the Mineral Security Partnership to improve critical resource collaboration. But such forums need to move quickly from dialogue to action. Businesses fear Beijing will keep adding new critical metals to its restrictions, and are concerned that chip production will suffer under higher prices and without the right inputs. Stepping up mining and refining efforts is key. China dominates both, but there are still significant critical metal reserves outside the country to exploit, including in the west. Nyrstar, owned by commodities trading group Trafigura, reckons a zinc smelter facility in Tennessee could meet 80 per cent of annual US demand for gallium and germanium. Higher commodity prices, on the back of Beijing’s controls, should also make extraction more attractive. But western governments need to make it easier for the industry to operate. Price volatility makes extraction risky, and below-cost exports from China are difficult to compete against. Streamlining onerous planning laws and chemical regulations across countries would help, alongside adopting joint environmental standards. Better co-ordination on financial incentives is also warranted. Price insurance and public-private partnerships can help de-risk projects for the rarest metals, while long-term offtake agreements can provide security of demand. Some critical metals can be costly and hard to recycle or to substitute, but supporting strategic research and development remains important, too. For example, gallium can be extracted from coal fly ash, a waste product from coal combustion. Silicon can also be a less-expensive substitute for germanium in certain electronic applications. For decades, governments in the west lapped up cheap raw materials from China, while Beijing invested heavily in mining, refining and exploration. The economic hostility between the US and China is highlighting just how short-sighted it was to build up dependence on a single supplier of essential metals. China’s command of the sector looks unassailable. But if America and its allies want to dilute its leverage in the trade war, a more concerted effort on critical minerals would help.
Well just on where Silver is about to go: Space, Solar, Electronics you name it!!!
https://www.mining.com/silver-looks-ready-to-rip/
Just the production of Solid State Diodes is Massive: plus the designing and creating of Solid State Chips, not to mention that they already have Major Contracts from Major Suppliers; 3-dollars looks conservative imo
The whole thing was about someone that got shares that wasn’t reported cause all the do over’s of the quarterly’s still they wouldn’t update the attorney letters, has much as the OTCM baited them with all those do over’s maybe even today imo
I believe that favorite is correct because the CEO himself stated to the matter in the early days of this, in one of his tweets but refused to address it with the OTCM: can’t find the tweet must of been removed: I do believe that they’re currently just hoping it would go away imo
You would think if you’re merging technology the intent is to become one?
Mind you there are only two trading platforms at this moment who allows trading for what ever reasons so I would assume that they can do anything whatever hopefully it’s time to let it go
The 600 shares just MMs talking to each other: meaning for them to apply resistance to the ask imo
This technology with a little gift of medicine astronomy would be superior above all curing everything imo
If there’s any chance on earth that this medical technology can do anything on that scale even close isn’t it a gift from heaven?
My take, so since the MMs are in the business of making money no matter which way the price goes by gamma scalping; someone giving orders to lock it down: the company?
So instead of communicating with his shareholders he’s opting to deal with the shvd-lawsuit instead; because he’s being advised not to even speak to his Major investors?
So if there’s a material event it’s mostly likely those unreported share the CEO mentioned in one of his tweets long ago: So if still not reported most likely he and cronies plan to take the company private imo
gosox12 Boston might sweep
I don’t believe that the CEO is putting up a valiant fight just to save his company from big time ruffians; when we all could be making a lot of money right now, and just look at the valiant soldiers that volunteered their support it’s been bloody!
Filling bid orders just enough to keep the price down; should tell you something hopefully planned automatic buyback at the drop of CE: AS down and OS up just enough to keep the share price down?
Making it look like there’s absolutely no interest in the stock to justify running it down because they’ll take only sell orders acting like there’s no buy orders imo
So who’s idea could that possibly be?
So is that the meaning of the two trading platforms to be able to force it down to triple .0001 and under killing it?
Those the players bringing the company to its knees but looking like they made their mistake and like the CEO can’t let them off or lose his company imo
From my analysis: So did said parties tried to shake the CEO down in CA. and get caught red handed in federal court; now wants to settle out of court but the CEO is having a problem with that decision imo
7:04 AM Wed May 29
?100%(?
U.
@otcmarkets.com temporary restraining order, or preliminary injunction with respect to conduct
alleged to have violated the false representation statute that applies to U.S mail.
None B. Describe briefly any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the issuer or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is the subject. Include the name of the court or agency in which the proceedings are pending, the date instituted, the principal parties thereto, a
description of the factual basis alleged to underlie the proceeding and the relief sought. Include similar information as to any such proceedings known to be contemplated by
governmental authorities.
A complaint was filed on August 22, 2022, in the Circuit Court for the city of Richmond, VA - - Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. regarding a contractual dispute relating to licensed BrightEye lighting product intellectual property and business development performance. That litigation settled in
2023, and the Company fully complied with the terms of the settlement agreement. Nonetheless, Atlantic Wave and Strikepoints filed a lawsuit in California state court in December, 2023. Cyberlux successfully removed that case to federal court and has filed counter claims against Atlantic Wave and Strikepoints. In a filing on March 21, 2024, the
attorney for Atlantic Wave and Strikepoints acknowledged that the suit in California was erroneously filed, and that he has moved to have the case dismissed. The parties are in
discussions seeking to settle the matter out of court.
Third Party Service Providers rovide the name, address, telephone number and email address of each of the following outside
roviders. You may add additional space as needed.
Securities Counsel (must include Counsel preparing Attorney Letters)
Name:
Carl P. Ranno
Firm:
Law Office of Carl P. Ranno
Address:
2733 East Vista Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Consider; why would anyone come on a say that GS says never: unless gs was an insider or some kind of a blackmailer; or deviant of a sort whom already knew what hand the OTCM would play nevertheless game on
Somebody get punched in the nose
They’ll stifle it then probably let it close at the .0047; on who’s ordering that’s the question and for what reasoning but I take it that you the current both trading platform is for the company’s purpose
My take: At the open MMS not taking any buying found a 48- dollar sell; why so, maybe because the company informed them to keep the price down: I am sure there must have been a flood load of buy orders imo
Looks likes BIXT is the perfect remedy for a biological warfare just drop one of those pills
I do believe that the MMs are signaling that they’re ready to go green just not yesterday so maybe a go sign; let’s see what they’re saying end of day
awesomed007 looking like some major collusion between certain parties; who know for what reason but seems very determined on keeping the price down so hopefully for a good reason but not likely
I would suppose that with all the new players involved and that we’re all humans being in actions let’s make a deal and move forward it’s looks to be an okay cause at least imo
The OTCM did give CYBL every chance to update their Attorney Letter in the past basically pledging with them: and mind you that the CEO knew what the problem was and still did not instruct the then Attorneys; now they must jump to it; let just how that the OTCM takes the shareholders into consideration imo