Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
gov denied the shares to complete the merger. its always the government keeping us in slave mode
Got the PM from a few days ago. Roger
Amazing, every time a stock crashes, the biggest promoters of the stock always made money. Lol
Regardless of the eventual outcome....many of us made out here.....I honestly feel for any who got in at the end and lost out...especially if they lost more than a grand....ouch....that does hurt a little....but I have been on the losing end before....I was lucky to get in and make out on this one....win some.....lose some.....its the name of the game
Good riddance to the whole lot of con artists.
He works for FX1 as minority owner, could try and send an email if you can find one. See if he has contact info in LinkedIn, most people working will keep that updated as you can see he has no reference to iTalk Inc. on there...
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dklee518/
$TALK
Is there a way to get in touch with lee directly? Just wondering
You do realize I posted the exact same thing
wrong.
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2018/ap-6201.pdf
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Administrative Proceedings Rulings
Release No. 6201 / October 16, 2018
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-18208
In the Matter of
HydroPhi Technologies Group,
Inc.,
iTalk Inc.,
Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc.,
and
U.S. Rare Earths, Inc.
Order Finding Service,
Directing Respondents to Show
Cause, and Scheduling
Prehearing Conference
On September 25, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
an order instituting proceedings (OIP) against Respondents under Section
12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. After a prior initial decision was
vacated by the Commission, the proceeding was reassigned to me on
September 12, 2018. Pending Admin. Proc., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release
No. 5955, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2264, at *2–3 (ALJ). The parties were provided
the opportunity to propose how further proceedings should be conducted.
HydroPhi Techs. Grp., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 6008, 2018 SEC
LEXIS 2388 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2018). None of the Respondents filed a proposal.
The Division of Enforcement represents that it was unable to contact any of
the Respondents.
1
On September 29, 2017, the Division submitted a declaration of service
that establishes that it served Respondents with the OIP by September 28,
2017, by mailing the OIP by U.S. Postal Service Priority Mail Express to each
1 The former CEO of Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc., told the Division
that he did not contest revocation, but because he had resigned, he was
unsure who controlled the company.
2
Respondent’s most recent address shown on its most recent filing with the
Commission in accordance with Rule of Practice 141(a)(2)(ii). 17 C.F.R.
§ 201.141(a)(2)(ii). As such, their answers were due by October 11, 2017. OIP
at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160(b), .220(b). To date, no Respondent has answered.
I ORDER that, by October 26, 2018, Respondents shall SHOW CAUSE
why the registration of their securities should not be revoked by default due
to their failure to file answers or otherwise defend this proceeding. If
Respondents fail to respond to this order or otherwise defend the proceeding,
they will be deemed in default and the registrations of their securities will be
revoked. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a)(2), .220(f).
I FURTHER ORDER that a telephonic prehearing conference will be
held on November 28, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. EST, if this matter has not been
concluded before then.
_______________________________
James E. Grimes
Administrative Law J
That could happen, but it could lose the ticker in the future, still plenty of other clean shells available for other companies.
The only hope I ever had was Lee still wanted this, will file form 211, and three year audited totals post revocation.
But chances are low imo.
$TALK
So are shares are basically worthless, even after revocation? I thought if someone picked up this "dirty" shell the shares are still apart of it?
The ticker will get deleted by Finra, another company can apply to use it after some time but it will not have anything to do with iTalk Inc common shares.
$TALK
Levy and Dea are m.i.a. and Lee's lawyer stated to a long here he was all done with $TALK so probably never coming back even after revocation.
.0009% chance that iTalk Inc will ever trade again after revocation.
They've had over a year to respond and have failed to do so. There wont be any phone call Nov.28th because they will be revoked before then.
I don't know I'll find out Nov 5th when the account converts.
$TALK
Understood. Are you still able to keep those shares?
SEC just updated with another ALJ order on iTalk:
"On September 25, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an order instituting proceedings (OIP) against Respondents under Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. After a prior initial decision was vacated by the Commission, the proceeding was reassigned to me on September 12, 2018. Pending Admin. Proc., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 5955, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2264, at *2–3 (ALJ). The parties were provided the opportunity to propose how further proceedings should be conducted. HydroPhi Techs. Grp., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 6008, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2388 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2018). None of the Respondents filed a proposal. The Division of Enforcement represents that it was unable to contact any of the Respondents. 1
On September 29, 2017, the Division submitted a declaration of service that establishes that it served Respondents with the OIP by September 28, 2017, by mailing the OIP by U.S. Postal Service Priority Mail Express to each Respondent’s most recent address shown on its most recent filing with the Commission in accordance with Rule of Practice 141(a)(2)(ii). 17 C.F.R. § 201.141(a)(2)(ii). As such, their answers were due by October 11, 2017. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160(b), .220(b). To date, no Respondent has answered.
I ORDER that, by October 26, 2018, Respondents shall SHOW CAUSE why the registration of their securities should not be revoked by default due to their failure to file answers or otherwise defend this proceeding. If Respondents fail to respond to this order or otherwise defend the proceeding, they will be deemed in default and the registrations of their securities will be revoked. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a)(2), .220(f).
I FURTHER ORDER that a telephonic prehearing conference will be held on November 28, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. EST, if this matter has not been concluded before then."
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders.shtml#
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2018/ap-6201.pdf
Incorrect. You should probably post the link to show the correct details.
New dispatch today from the SEC. TALK didn't bother to respond so they will be revoked about October 26th.
No just the last update. Capital One is moving to ETrade they want me to let go of my worthless TALK shares in that account.
It would be my luck they someday return to trading...
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-18208.xml
This proceeding was assigned to me following the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s order dated August 22, 2018. Pending Admin. Proc., Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 10536, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2058; Pending Admin. Proc., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 5955, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2264 (ALJ Sept. 12, 2018). I direct the parties to submit proposals for the conduct of further proceedings by October 9, 2018. If possible, the parties should confer and submit a joint proposal that reflects any agreement regarding service of the order instituting proceedings (OIP) and addresses the numbered items in 17 C.F.R. § 201.221(c). If the Division of Enforcement is unable to contact Respondents, it should submit a notice to that effect by October 9.
The previously assigned administrative law judge revoked the registration of Respondents’ securities by default. If Respondents again fail to participate by not submitting a proposal, and I find that they have been served with the OIP but never filed an answer, I may enter an initial decision of default against them. Pending Admin. Proc., 2018 SEC LEXIS 2058, at *4; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a)(2), .220(f).
$TALK
Any updates on the SEC with regards to revocation?
maybe just a glitch in the matrix?..who knows..maybe one day we'll wake up to some shock treatment :)
imho
mj
Something is going on here.....may not be much but over a million and a half in volume for something that is supposed to be on deaths door......I feel a disturbance in the force.........
Ahh, did not catch what that meant. Got it now.
Did you not see the "ba dum tsss"?
Um, no sorry. TALK should have been avoided.
You never know. Maybe one day we'll wake up to TALK in the penny range.
Badum tssss
LOL, 11 bagger from .0000008
$TALK
I haven't looked, but is there an ALJ hearing set yet?
My TALK shares are still in my etrade account. Last price .00001. Under value there's a little emoji ROFLAO.
I am so confused.
my main etrade account only shoes my Barnes and noble stock.
BUT when I trigger the optionshouse app, it shows talk at .0003?
No one is fighting it, there was a Supreme Court case that caused all the pending revocations, all of them, to start over with s different ALJ. See the article. TALK has a second chance to appeal, but probably won't.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-sec/supreme-court-deems-sec-in-house-judge-hiring-unconstitutional-idUSKBN1JH224
Then see SEC doc on the matter.
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2018/ap-5954.pdf
$TALK
Why are they fighting it!!
If they dont plan on trading anyways
Probably the same amount time given after the first hearing. I am not sure though, seems they will reschedule hearing I am thinking then if silence throughout it will follow the same process as usual.
$TALK
PB thanks for keeping us up-to-date on all of these documents. This one appears to say that the judge will issue an order by October 3rd asking for information from the company so it appears that the order will be issued by October 3rd and then the company has so much time to respond.
If no response or participation by October 3rd the default judgement will be entered, and without the hold up, should be quick.
There was a Supreme Court case that the SEC lost calling their ALJ's unconstitutional because they were appointed by lesser admininstrators. All the pending revocations during the period of the court case time need to be restarted.
See post below:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143278883
$TALK
How is this still not revoked. Talk about slow. Are Talk and the Sec competing?
Imaterialistic not tempted
I'm sure TALK is no longer my friend. TBH I would be more excited when they get revoked. Then "MAYBE" something can happen.
Interesting why renew unless something is in the works??!! Stay tuned........
Shorts will be covering
Check this out. Website renewed until Expiration Date:2019-08-31. There is hope yet for $TALK?
https://www.whois.com/whois/italkmobility.com
https://www.italkmobility.com
It is kinda sad. Some folks still think TALK was a legit business and cannot accept they were snookered.
It's not really news except someone either prepaid or just renewed the website domain. We were all curious to see if that happened.
$TALK
Followers
|
311
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
82575
|
Created
|
12/11/12
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |