iQSTEL Inc (IQST)

[Boiler_Master]

It's not. There's a convertible note due next year (not December). The money they borrowed for the QXTEL acquisition is on a 1 year convertible note. For others, that basically means the loan is backed by shares as collateral. The company has explained this and even referred to the note as a bridge loan. They intend to secure better, longer term financing and will pay off the convertible note before it's 12 month due date in Q1. That's part of why they are meeting with banks right now. They want to borrow 10M with better financing terms. About 5M would pay off existing debts, and the other 5M would go towards working capital, future acquisitions etc. However, even if they don't secure the 10M loan, they could simply refinance the convertible note for another year. They've never had a problem getting funding, they just want better funding terms than they have previously been offered, lower interest rates etc. So to think they will just completely neglect it and default on the loan in Q1 resulting in a share conversion is kind of ridiculous. But it is technically possible, and an S-1 had to be filed making shares avaliable while the convertible note is in place. That individual you responded to, he has been posting on multiple message boards regularly, for months, referencing the S-1 and trying to convince people the conversion is 100% guaranteed to happen by end of year and that there will be 50 million shares diluted. The convertible note isn't even 50M, i think it's 36M. The guy knows it's false information, he doesn't care. He's just bashing to spread fear and manipulate the share price lower.

[wooferwax]

They are not going to do anything rash until the 10K comes out next year which will have guidance going forward. Then maybe...

Company goals are just that...goals

[mdb1]

It's still in the $.16s and $.17s for all the news/talk.

[snow]

kym The second issue you raise was discussed I think some months ago. Boiler Master far from agrees with you as far as I remember. I forget the details but I suspect the situation is not as bad regarding dilution as you suggest.

[kym1216]

You nailed. it. How can they get listed this year without a reverse split. The problem is, how can they do a reverse split when they have that convertible out there that will turn into 50 million additional shares at the end of December. That S-1 they did in April is what has been keeping this down. The conversion is at .11. Which means they will be dumping 50 million shares at most likely .13 to .15.

[GigantorX]

Goal for 2024? LoL. 

No. Same old shit. Same old drop into the toilet.

[snow]

What makes t his post unconvincing:

"2. Nasdaq Uplisting: Management has made it clear that their goal for 2024 includes uplisting to the Nasdaq. This milestone, once achieved, is expected to significantly elevate the company’s visibility, potentially driving new investors into the stock.

3. Expanding Business Divisions: Beyond telecommunications, iQSTEL is making strides in emerging technologies like IoT, electric vehicles (EV), and even the Metaverse. These new revenue streams provide additional growth avenues that aren’t yet fully appreciated by the market."

The goal is for uplisting this year. There are just over 3 months to go. The pps will have to jump more than 1,000% for this to happen or there will have to be a reverse split. There is no assessment of the chance of this happening. Are there any significant new revenue streams?

[Mr.Fields]

With an 81% projected RPS growth and the QXTEL acquisition set to nearly double the company’s size, iQSTEL is making serious moves. Business circles are taking notice, and industry watchers are keeping a close eye on these developments. 📈

Full article here: https://pubcoinsight.com/pubco-insight-are-investors-missing-the-point-on-iqstel/

$IQST #Telecom

[snow]

oldman I think this is positive news. I am not always negative.

[oldman69]

To clarify their official response to a RS is:

"Hi Dan, two things to be aware of: one, the company has no plans at this time for a reverse split. Secondly, if anything like that were to occur, it would only be in concert with investment bankers who would be infusing capital, possibly assets or through other means is part of a careful up listing plan. Further, we would seek shareholder approval to make sure everybody was in support. There would be no surprises"

Good enough for me!!!

[theSauceman]

Sauerkraut, show me. Unless you can I'm sticking with the belief that the PREFER not to. I am bullish on $IQST and have hoped to see "no RS" mentioned by the company. Never have I seen an absolute NO. IMO they have left the door open just a crack in case push comes to shove and they have no other option in meeting their goal. If they are serious about NASDAQ and the timeline they have set runs out, then they could be faced with a decision. Thus the door is open a crack to prevent them from being cornered in to admitting they ever said "absolutely not." Do your homework and I believe you will never find that they ever said flat out NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate and admire their persistence and drive to get to NASDAQ organically. And I certainly hope they (we) do. I think the company is strong enough, but if the clock winds down I will respect their decision and know they never lied about it. They will not surprise me and though I may think that a chosen option is not the best, I expect that $IQST will fill its spot in the sector.

[Sauerkraut]

They said " no RS" in PR's

[theSauceman]

The interview was a little flat. But then that could be personalities and presentation. It seemed to be largely reiteration... but at least they did reiterate. I think their goals for $IQST are adequate and acheivable. I like that they are not shooting too high, but keeping goals within reach. One quality of the interview was their indication to keep the timeline moving, even with intention to realize some finalizations sooner than later. So, these two lack some people skills, but I suspect their intent for the growth of the company, and for the share value, is sincere. I look forward to wading thru the mire of negative feedback with them to see, and benefit by, the success of the company.

STRICTLY MY OPINION FOR MY OWN ENTERTAINMENT. NOT MEANT AS ADVICE OR SUGGESTION BY ANY MEASURE. BEST TO ALL.

[videoRoB1]

I’d say not much. And there’s a bid for 320 thousand shares above yesterday’s closing price. I’m gonna guess it won’t drop at all.

[snow]

BM My hunch tells me that a projection three years into the future in this case is not much more than a sheer guess. If you go three years into the past and try to present a similar projection for this year what would it have been? I suspect that it would have been much better than the reality today. But if you believe in your own projection I understand that you are very optimistic. Based on a number of posts about the past few years that I have read I assume that it is realistic to expect that the future will be way less successful than you expect it to be. But there is of course a certain chance that things may change drastrically for the better. I have seen the pps drop by about 50% since my first purchase of shares in this stock despite the fast growth in revenues. This shows that the stock market dues not by your very bullish expectations.

[GigantorX]

How much is this piece of shit gonna drop today?

Company PR's and spin are about as effective as mask mandates and school closures.

[Monroe1]

These bidders too have their own agenda which has nothing to do with any interviews until a sufficient number of traders react then they simply adjust their "commissions" up or down. The bidders agree with nobody. It is only coincidental should a trader agree with their pricings. Big news moves the market. The rest of the times it is played by the bidders.

[Boiler_Master]

I don't invest for 1 year out Snow. 3 years out, 2027... I would expect they hit their 1B revenue goal. 25 to 50M net (2.5 to 5%) but focus would still mainly be on growth to achieve the 1B revenue so net will probably be closer to the 25M. At that point I'd say average P/E is 25-30 but they should trade well above that bc YOY performance will be well above average (8-10% annual improvements). Maybe 60x earnings would be fair. But going conservative, 25M net and only a 25 P/E that'd be a 625M market cap which is a 1,916% improvement from today's valuation. On the higher end, which will be alot more realistic if they have streams of revenue from multiple industries by then... 50M x 60 P/E = 3 billion market cap. So low end bearish case would be around $3 a share with high end being well over $10.

You'll say I'm crazy, just pumping. But is a net income of 2.5% and 25 P/E pumper talk? No, it's an extremely bearish prediction.

What would you project the 2027 numbers and valuations to be on the high and low end?

[snow]

I sggest that those who disagree with me regarding the recent interview with management listen to what they stated. I regard their performance as weak. It looks as if the biddders agree with me:

"GTSM 0.1627 10,741 11:12
CSTI 0.162 10,000 10:36
CFGN 0.162 5,000 09/17
CDEL 0.161 5,478 11:13
INTL 0.161 5,000 11:13"

[snow]

BM Your assumption is false. It was based on net earnings of 3 million dollars. That is way above current profitability if the company is currently profitable at all. What sort of net earnings do you expect for 2025?

[sricket]

Great snow job.

[Boiler_Master]

Still trying to convince people a P/E ratio of 20 is realistic for a company crossing into profitability and growing over 100%? You're pathetic.

[snow]

I listened to part of the interview. I was not impressed by the performance of management. What is positive is that the company will try to expand the sms business that has better profit margins than the voice business. If I did not misunderstand the hope is to improve the bottom line by two million dollars this way. I did not hear the time frame. Assuming net earnings of 3 million dollars,185 million shares and a p/e ratio of 20, the stock price wo uld have been about 35 cents. That is very far indeed from 2 dollars, which is the minimum requirement for a NASDAQ listing.

[Leandroi2002]

News out

$IQST - IQSTEL, Interview with the management in Madrid, Sept 2024 #otc #otcmarkets #otcqb #otcqx #nasdaq #telecom #fintech #ev #ai #metaverse #bright #future #record #revenue #billion #million

[mdb1]

$.16s hit today -- disappointing!!!!

[mdb1]

Back to the $.17s .. Oh well.

[vdt]

Prepare for a bounce this week
Best wishes everyone
Time for the train to ve the station

[mdb1]

Can a bounce up to $.25s happen on the news? I wonder.

[potofgold]

Saw the news and bought a small ticket this morning.

Just waiting for it to get to a bigger board and take off.

[theSauceman]

SHOULD I don my spacesuit and dust off my helmet?

[theSauceman]

WILL it be... the final squeeze?

[theSauceman]

I've got to wonder... IS the squeeze approaching?

[theSauceman]

That's why I'm willing to look at whether I believe what they're saying or the bashers that call them liars, and the stats. And I'm willing to sort the stats to the ones that either show or don't show growth. And when the grow becomes continuous and is multiple, approaching exponential, then I'm willing to understand the costs taken out before net profit. Like I said, for me, it boils down to what I believe about who's truthful and who's mistaken (or lying). Afterall there is more motivation to lie against the company than from within (at least as much).

STRICTLY MY OPINION FOR ME ONLY. CHOOSE YOUR OWN PATHS AND I HOPE YOU ALL PROSPER.

[theSauceman]

Unlike everyone else on this board, I never said I had a problem with a properly implemented RS. Yet it still remains to be seen whether they will need that tool or not. Btw, I don't see that they ever said it wasn't on the table. Look back to see that they always PREFERRED organic. Necessities are always chosen over preferences. biz101

[cootcat]

But you are laying no your back

[Sauerkraut]

PPS direction is on my side.....lol

[Sauerkraut]

Seriously. Membermark for everyone who can post any serious link concerning any of their "great" achievements. In the means of official reachable links not from IQST related websites. Which can be used by retail and are working already.....

- Smart Gas/Tank - I´m working for companie´s like DOW and BASF. Nobody there knows anything about those things or testing of it
- EV sales (motorbikes and cars)
- www.globalmoneyone.com -nothing to be found on social media to make me believe anybody can or will use it....
- Metaverse - Who cares anymore?
- AI - there are other players which have just a lot more power and money

I don´t rember any more of their 97+ promises, so just concentrate on that above. Feel free to add more.

Please, just one Link to any functional thing that has come to fruition over the last years.

I´m here since inception......made public by MSPC. Just another fraud.

Convince me somehow. Not with numbers and plans. Each good scam has those........Achievements?????? not to be found

It´s a telecom fraud companny runing of retails money.

GLTA Longs. I´m flipping arround till oblivion.......

[Sauerkraut]

Now replying from my phone......

[snow]

BM It is impossible to know for sure which companies develop like T-mobile and which remain failures. Nobody can know for certain that this company will not be a great success in the future. Based on what has happened in the chance I think it is unlikely that this company will be a great success in the future, but I may be very wrong. Time will show and we may get an indication within a year.

[Sauerkraut]

And they can shuffle around their balance sheet for now with so many acquisition. Nobody knows. Expect insiders. Even "bigger" CO's at NASDAQ turning out to be scams all the time...... everyday

[Sauerkraut]

Ok girls. Calm down. It's not about figures. It's all about scam or not.....

[Sauerkraut]

Far, far away from moon. Sorry. You will get RS'd. Some while back they said organic growth rather than RS......not no RS. Now they left out the organic thing in shareholders letter........have fun.

I'm buying back in from .14 downwards.....

[Boiler_Master]

Snow referenced T-mobile as a telecom comparable having a P/E ratio of 23. Meaning the market cap is 23x annual earnings. But T-mobile is a large established company with average annual performance now. Back when they were a high growth company crossing over into profitability they traded at 770x earnings.

T-mobile first became profitable in 2013 showing a net income of 35 million. Their market cap in 2013 was 26.97 billion. That was a P/E ratio of 770. Google it. If T-mobile is any comparison to how we should value IQST, as Snow initially said we should based on T-monile's P/E ratio, even 1M earnings at the same 770 P/E ratio would put the SP above $4.

Valuing a high growth company based on current earnings alone is ignorant. If you want a one ratio valuation, you are better off using P/S than P/E. T-mobile's first profitable year, they were at 1.1x sales. For IQST a 1.1 P/S ratio based on 290M revenue and 185M shares would be $1.57 which IMO would not be unreasonable at all for a company operating around break even while showing over 100% YOY growth.

There are countless companies currently on the Nasdaq operating at a loss with valuations in the hundreds of millions, and even billions. That's because you invest in a company for their future 1, 3, and 5+ years out. Not what they did last year. Previous years are good to track and trend out future performance, but that's about all.

[Sauerkraut]

They want to raise $10M. That matches my buy target from .08-.12.

They can make one last offering....100M shares at .10 or something around that range. AS reached, then RS.

Just imo......

[Sauerkraut]

Lol

[Sauerkraut]

Nothing left from organic pps increase????

[snow]

BM "You, well you're intentionally misleading people." You don't know my intentions. You pretend that you do. I feel contempt for this sort of people. In fact I express my opinions. Based on what I have read here my impression is that this company has a history of deception. One thing that suggests that this is so is that despite the great growth in revenues the pps is now a fraction of what it was years ago. This indicates incompetence rather than the opposite.

[Boiler_Master]

Correction, T-mobile is on fortune's 100 best companies to work for list. Idk where they are as largest companies list but their market cap is over 200 billion. Point remains the same, if you wanna compare IQST to T-mobile, compare them to when T-mobile was the size of IQST. They operated at a loss for years while focused on growth.

[Boiler_Master]

That's interesting. I have never thought highly of you. I can tell you're obviously smart and understand what you're talking about, but you leverage that into misleading people.

I actually realized I would never respect you the day you said T-mobile was a great comparison to value IQST and used T-mobile's current P/E ratios as a Fortune 100 company to tell people IQST is basically worthless. Then when I provided their historical valuations, back when T-mobile was the size of IQST and losing money, their valuation then applied to IQST now showed IQST as being massively undervalued. You immediately flipped and went from saying T-mobile was the perfect comparison, to saying T-mobile is a ridiculous comparison bc the data didn't support your agenda.

I make honest mistakes, I'm human. But I have good intentions. You, well you're intentionally misleading people. You try and sound smart so they'll believe your bullshit and think your opinions hold more weight.

[theSauceman]

I only wonder how close are we? 3..2..1 🚀 I see $IQST in a quick breakout when it comes, leaving those waiting for proof in a FOMO position having to make a quick decision at a higher pps. Oh yeah, and asking how banks showing confidence in an operation will help is like asking how does money and strength help anything. $IQST$$, with or without you I see leaving the planet soon. 🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆

STRICTLY AS I SEE IT IN MY OWN FRAIL MIND AND AS ALWAYS ONLY FOR MY OWN ENTERTAINMENT. I SUGGEST NO DECISIONS AND IMPLY NO ACTIONS. LOOK AT WHAT YOU SEE AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. HOPE TO SEE YOU AT THE BANK.