eMax Holdings, Inc. (fka EMXC)

[graydave]

EMAX is dead. The best we can hope for is a stock swap and then they can bury it once and for all. I am worried that they will announce one but then never follow through like they have done in the past. I wish they would update the website or take it down. We need the company to communicate with us.

[inti23]

i see mpix news today, hope it helps us here!

[David i INVEST]

TRAIN IS COMING AND THIS LADY IS GETTING OUT OF STEAM

[David i INVEST]

Belize long vacations... You think rox was wanting to write that trip off with mpix or emxc?

[lucky, mydog]

FINRA 15c2-11 and Form 211 questions and answers:

Here is the full list of FINRA's questions and answers regarding SEC Rule 15c2-11 and Form 211's.

http://finra.complinet.com/en/display/display_viewall.html?rbid=2403&element_id=1714&print=1

92-50 Procedures Regarding Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-11 and Schedule H, Section 4 of the NASD® By-Laws


SUGGESTED ROUTING:*

Senior Management
Corporate Finance
Government Securities
Institutional
Internal Audit
Legal & Compliance
Municipal
Operations
Syndicate
Trading
Training
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In response to questions by members, issuers, and the legal community, the NASD is issuing this Notice to Members to address frequently raised questions regarding Schedule H, Section 4 of the NASD By-Laws relating principally to compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission or SEC) Rule 15c2-11. This section of Schedule H is described in Notice to Members 90-40. It requires broker/dealers to submit information to the NASD gathered pursuant to SEC Rule 15c2-11 before initiating or resuming a quotation of a non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity security in any quotation medium. Section 4 also requires members to specify the basis and factors considered in establishing their initial priced entries for a non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity security before such entry may be published in any quotation medium. In preparing this Notice, the NASD has received comments from the staff of the Division of Market Regulation of the SEC; however, the views expressed in this Notice represent those of the NASD.

INTRODUCTION

SEC Rule 15c2-11 governs the submission and publication of quotations by brokers and dealers for certain non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity securities. Specifically, the rule applies to a broker/dealer's initiation or resumption of quotations for such securities in any interdealer quotation medium, including the NASD's OTC Bulletin Board" and National Quotation Bureau, Inc.'s "Pink Sheets" ("pink sheets"). Pursuant to the rule, brokers and dealers are required to review and maintain specified information about the issuer of the security before publishing a quotation for that security.

Unless an exception to Rule 15c2-11 is available, the rule can be satisfied in one of only five ways: (1) the broker/dealer must have in its possession a prospectus specified by Section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) that has been filed with the Commission and which has been in effect less than 90 calendar days; or (2) the broker/dealer must have a copy of the offering circular provided for under Regulation A of the Securities Act and the effective date must be within the preceding 40 days; or (3) the issuer must be current in its filings with the Commission and the broker/dealer must have in its possession the issuer's latest Form 10-K and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks; or (4) the issuer must be exempt from Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) and the broker/dealer must have in its possession all the information furnished to the Commission during the issuer's last fiscal year; or (5) the broker/dealer must have in its possession 16 items of information about the issuer, including financial information which shall be reasonably current in relation to the day the quotation is submitted.

Paragraph (g)(1) of Rule 15c2-11 provides that the required financial information with respect to the issuer will be presumed to be reasonably current, unless the broker/dealer has information to the contrary, if the balance sheet is as of a date less than 16 months before the submission or publication of the quotation; the statements of profit and loss and retained earnings are for the 12 months preceding the date of such balance sheet; and, if such balance sheet is not as of a date less than six months before the submission or publication of the quotation, is accompanied by additional statements of profit and loss and retained earnings for the period from the date of such balance sheet to a date less than six months before the submission or publication of the quotation.

Information that does not satisfy the time frame of paragraph (g)(1) of Rule 15c2-11, is presumptively not reasonably current. Broker/dealers seeking to rely on information outside of the time frame must affirmatively establish that the financial information is reasonably current.

Documentation compiled by a member pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 must be filed with the NASD pursuant to Schedule H, Section 4 of the By-Laws together with a completed Form 211 at least three business days prior to entering a quotation in a quotation medium. Upon receipt, the NASD conducts a substantive review of the material and within three business days, notifies the broker/dealer whether the application has cleared such that quotation activity may begin or, alternately identifies deficiencies in the submission which must be resolved prior to a member being permitted to enter a quotation in a quotation medium.

The following is a compilation of questions and answers relative to SEC Rule 15c2-11, the NASD's OTC Bulletin Board, and Schedule H of the NASD By-Laws.

QUESTIONS

Rule 15c2-11, Informational Requirements

Question #1: What degree of scrutiny must a broker/dealer give the required Rule 15c2-11 documentation prior to submitting the information to the NASD seeking clearance to publish a quotation?

Answer: Prior to submitting the information to the NASD, a broker/dealer must have a reasonable basis for believing that the information is accurate in all material respects and is obtained from a reliable source.

Question #2: What steps should a broker/dealer take to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate in all material respects?

Answer: A broker/dealer must review the material for obvious errors, internal inconsistencies, and questionable disclosures. This review must be in the context of all other information about the issuer in the broker/dealer's knowledge or possession, including the information required by paragraph (b).

Question #3: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11 paragraph (b)?

Answer: Paragraph (b) requires a broker/dealer to have in its possession: (1) A record of the circumstances surrounding the quotation request, including the identity of the person for whom the quotation is being submitted, (2) a copy of the trading suspension order or the Commission release announcing the suspension if the security has been suspended by the Commission during the last 12 months, and (3) a copy or written record of other material information, including adverse information, that the broker/dealer becomes aware of prior to publishing a quotation.

Question #4: What steps should a broker/dealer take to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is obtained from a reliable source?

Answer: Generally, a broker/dealer can be satisfied that information is obtained from a reliable source if it is received from the issuer or its agents, or was obtained from an independent information service such as the Commission's public reference room. If a broker/dealer receives information about an issuer from another market maker or someone other than an agent of the issuer, the broker/dealer should verify the validity of the information with the issuer. Agents do not include promoters or others outside the issuer that may have a personal or an indirect interest in the security.

Question #5: Under what circumstances would a broker/dealer be required to take further steps to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate in all material respects and the sources of the information are reliable?

Answer: Ordinarily the broker/dealer need not do any further review unless a potential material deficiency has been detected. Examples of potential material deficiencies are material inconsistencies in the information or between the information and other information in the broker/dealer's possession, a qualified auditor's report, a recently acquired asset that materially enhances the financial condition of the issuer, or a material asset listed on the balance sheet that is unrelated to the issuer's business.

Question #6: What should a broker/dealer do if a potential material deficiency is detected in the documents?

Answer: A broker/dealer's specific efforts to satisfy itself with respect to the accuracy of the information if a potential material deficiency has been detected will vary with the circumstances, and may require the broker/dealer to obtain additional information or seek to verify existing information. For example, the broker/dealer may be satisfied that the information is correct after questioning the issuer, or the broker/dealer may need to consult an independent source, such as an attorney or accountant. Regardless of the methodology used to review a potential material deficiency, members are required to maintain in their records any other material information (including adverse information) regarding the issuer which comes to the member's knowledge or possession before the publication or submission of the quotation. Members are also strongly urged to document the manner in which the material deficiencies are resolved.

Question #7: May a broker/dealer satisfy its obligation to review the required information and have a reasonable belief as to its accuracy and the reliability of its source solely because its documentation has been reviewed by the NASD?

Answer: No. A broker/dealer must independently satisfy the requirements of Rule 15c2-11. Clearance by the NASD to initiate quotations in a quotation medium is not a substitute for this review.

Question #8: Are a wholesale market maker's obligations under Rule 15c2-11 any different than a retail market maker's obligations?

Answer: No. Commission Release No. 34-29094 states that the rule is directed at the fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative potential of a broker/dealer's quotations, and does not focus on whether the broker/dealer also engages in retail activity.

Question #9: Can a supplemental prospectus satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(1)?

Answer: Yes. As long as the supplemental prospectus is filed pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Securities Act and includes sufficient information about the issuer to enable the broker/dealer to satisfy its obligation under Rule 15c2-11, i.e., it contains the types of information described in Rule 15c2-11(a)(5). However, if the issuer meets the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(a)(3), the broker/dealer must obtain the documents required by Rule 15c2-11(a)(3).

Question #10: Is the issuer required to be current in its filings with the Commission in order for the broker/dealer to utilize Rule 15c2-11(a)(3)?

Answer: Yes. Issuers that meet the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(a)(3) are those issuers that report to the Commission and are current in their reports. The broker/dealer must have the issuer's latest Form 10-K and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and those Form 8-Ks filed within five business days prior to publication or submission of the quotation. If the issuer has not filed a Form 10-K, the broker/dealer must have a copy of the prospectus, which has been in effect less than 16 months, and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks. If a filing is due at the Commission prior to the NASD's clearance of the Form 211 application, that filing must also be submitted with the application.

Question #11: What happens if an issuer is not current in its filings with the Commission?

Answer: If the issuer is not current in its filings with the Commission, the broker/dealer can seek to satisfy another subsection of the rule. Usually this would be Rule 15c2-11(a)(5). However, the fact that the issuer is not current in its filings may bear upon the determination of whether the available information is materially accurate.

Question #12: Can banks that file Form 10-Ks and Form 10-Qs with the Office of Thrift Supervision or other bank regulators satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(3)?

Answer: If the reports are filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with bank regulators, the reports will satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(3).

Question #13: What information is required to be submitted under Rule 15c2-11(a)(4) relating to certain foreign issuers which are exempt from the periodic reporting requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act?

Answer: The broker/dealer is required to submit all the information that the issuer has furnished during its past fiscal year to the Commission in order for the issuer to maintain its Rule 12g3-2(b) exemption.

Question #14: Must the financial information required under Rule 15c2-11(a)(5) be independently audited?

Answer: No. Rule 15c2-11(a)(5) does not require audited financials. However, a broker/dealer would ordinarily be required to review unaudited financial statements more closely than if the statements were independently audited. Nevertheless, simply because the statements have been audited, a broker/dealer cannot avoid its responsibility to review the financial statements in order to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate.

Question #15: If an issuer has filed a Form 10-K or a prospectus with the Commission and the issuer is current in its reports to the Commission, can the broker rely on Rule 15c2-11(a)(5)?

Answer: No. If an issuer has filed a 10-K or prospectus with the Commission and is current in its reports, the broker must file under, and have in its possession the information required by, Rule 15c2-11(a)(3).

Question #16: What are the requirements for a broker/dealer if the issuer or its predecessor has been the subject of a Commission trading suspension during the preceding year?

Answer: An SEC trading suspension should alert the broker/dealer to the possibility that information in its possession concerning the issuer may no longer be current or accurate. The broker/dealer must be particularly cautious when seeking to reinstate quotations following an SEC trading suspension. The member must obtain a copy of the Commission trading suspension order or the Commission release announcing the trading suspension. A broker/dealer should, at a minimum, receive assurances or additional information with respect to matters cited in the suspension order or with respect to other matters affecting the broker/dealer's reasonable belief as to the accuracy of the information. Reliance on new information or assurances from prior sources of information in these circumstances, however, requires caution. In exceptional cases, where the source is unable to provide reasonable assurances about the reliability of the information, consultation with an independent accountant or attorney may be warranted. All information gathered in the broker/dealer's investigation of the issues must accompany the Form 211 application.
Rule 15c2-11 Exceptions

Question #17: Are there any exceptions from the informational requirements of Rule 15c2-11?

Answer: Yes. If a broker/dealer can meet one of the exceptions of Rule 15c2-11, it is not required to maintain or submit to the NASD any documents required by Rule 15c2-11. These exceptions primarily relate to instances where a broker/dealer wishes to quote a security that: is traded on a national securities exchange in the United States; represents unsolicited customer interest; has been the subject of regular and continuous quotations for the past 30 days; or is traded on Nasdaq.

Question #18: When does the Rule 15c2-11(f)(1) "exchange" exception apply?

Answer: The exchange exception applies to securities that are traded on a United States national securities exchange on the same day or the business day prior to the day the application is made to the quotation medium.

Question #19: If the common stock of an issuer trades on the New York Stock Exchange, are the warrants of the same issuer exempt from Rule 15c2-11?

Answer: No. The exception relates only to specific securities and not to the issuer. Each security must independently meet the requirements of the exception.

Question #20: If trading in a security is halted or suspended on Nasdaq or an exchange, but the security has not been officially delisted from Nasdaq or the exchange, can it be listed on the OTC Bulletin Board?

Answer: No. The OTC Bulletin Board is only for non-Nasdaq, non-U.S. exchange-listed securities. Dual listing is not permitted. Until a security is officially delisted from an exchange or Nasdaq, it cannot be entered on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Question #21: If the broker/dealer is claiming the Rule 15c2-11(f)(2) "unsolicited customer interest" exception of Rule 15c2-11, can the broker/dealer publish quotations for the security in a quotation medium for its own account?

Answer: No. If the broker/dealer claims the unsolicited customer interest exception, it can only publish or submit a quotation for that customer account. If the broker/dealer wishes to publish or submit a quotation for its own account or any other accounts, it must comply with Rule 15c2-11. Paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 15c2-11 does not apply to a quotation consisting of both a bid and an offer, each at a specified price, unless the quotation medium specifically identifies the quotation as representing a customer's unsolicited indication of interest.

Question #22: Will the NASD be monitoring the broker/dealer's compliance with the unsolicited customer interest exception?

Answer: Yes. The NASD monitors all aspects of broker/dealer compliance with Rule 15c2-11, including a quotation utilizing the unsolicited customer interest exception. The NASD may require the broker/dealer to produce its trading records and other documents to determine whether the broker/dealer traded for any account other than the indicated customer.

Question #23: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(f)(3), the "piggyback" exception?

Answer: If a broker/dealer is relying on the Rule 15c2-11(f)(3) exception, the security must be quoted in the same interdealer quotation medium as the intended quotation during the past 30 calendar days, and that during those 30 days the security had to be quoted on at least 12 days without more than four consecutive business days without quotations.

Question #24: Do "name only" quotations satisfy the piggyback exception requirement that the security be quoted in the quotation medium?

Answer: Yes. The information requirements of Rule 15c2-11 apply to name only as well as priced quotations. Both types of quotations can be used to satisfy the piggyback exception. It should be noted, however, that each broker/dealer submitting a quotation must satisfy the informational requirements of Rule 15c2-11 until all of the requirements of the piggyback exception, including the 30-day quotation period, have been satisfied.

Question #25: What happens when a security is no longer quoted by a broker/dealer in the quotation medium?

Answer: If a security is not quoted by any broker/dealer for a period of more than 4 business days, the security no longer qualifies for the piggyback exception. A broker/dealer would be required to comply with Rule 15c2-11 before it could initiate or resume quotation of the security.

Question #26: What constitutes a "business day" for purposes of Rule 15c2-11?

Answer: For purposes of Rule 15c2-11, a "business day" is defined by reference to the quotation medium to which a broker/dealer submits the quotation. Any day that the quotation medium accepts and disseminates quotations would constitute a "business day" under Rule 15c2-11.

Question #27: Must a broker/dealer quote a security for an entire "business day" to qualify for the "piggyback" exception contained in paragraph (f)(3)ofRulel5c2-11?

Answer: Under the "piggyback" exception, a security will be deemed to have been quoted on a business day where a broker/dealer has continuously quoted a security for all or a substantial portion of that day. The existence of closing quotations on the OTC Bulletin Board may be used by the NASD to create a rebuttable presumption that the broker/dealer continuously quoted a security for a substantial portion of the business day.

Question #28: If a security qualifies for the piggyback exception in one quotation medium, does it meet the piggyback exception for other quotation mediums? For example, if a security is quoted in the OTC Bulletin Board, can a market maker quote the security in the "pink sheets" without filing a Form 211 application?

Answer: No. The staff of the SEC takes the position that the piggyback exception does not transfer from one quotation medium to another. Thus, quotations for a security in the OTC Bulletin Board may not be used to satisfy the piggyback requirements for the "pink sheets."

Question #29: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(f)(5), the "Nasdaq" exception?

Answer: In order for a broker/dealer to rely on the Nasdaq exception, the security must be authorized for quotation on Nasdaq and the authorization must not be suspended, terminated, or prohibited.

Question #30: Can a broker/dealer publish a quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board for a security that is currently traded on Nasdaq?

Answer: No. The OTC Bulletin Board does not allow quotations for Nasdaq securities.

Question #31: If the common stock and units of an issuer are already quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, does a Form 211 application need to be submitted for the warrants of the same issuer?

Answer: Yes. Rule 15c2-11 applies to securities, not issuers. Quotations for the common stock and units may be in compliance with Rule 15c2-1 1, but that does not qualify any other securities of the issuer. Accordingly, a completed Form 211 and the Rule 15c2-11 information would have to be submitted for the warrants. However, if the broker/dealer has previously submitted documents relating to the issuer that continue to meet the requirements of Rule 15c2-11, it need not refile identical documents. The broker/dealer need only submit a completed Form 211 alone or with any additional documents needed to comply with Rule 15c2-11.

Schedule H and OTC Bulletin Board Questions

Question #32: What must be included in the basis and factors for a broker/dealer's initial priced entry?

Answer: A broker/dealer's basis and factors should relate to the price that the broker/dealer is proposing. The statement on the Form 211 must be concise and directly related to the proposed bid and/or offer. The basis and factors should not be broad generalized statements but should articulate how the priced quotation was determined, including the factors taken into consideration. The NASD is not conducting merit review but must be able to clearly understand the basis for the initial priced entry.

Question #33: If a broker/dealer's Rule 15c2-11 documentation has been cleared by the NASD, but the broker/dealer did not request clearance for a priced quotation, is the broker/dealer required to file anything additional when it changes its unpriced quotation to a priced quotation?

Answer: Yes. The broker/dealer must supplement its original application with the Form 211 indicating the intended priced entry and the basis and factors even if other broker/dealers are publishing priced quotations for the security or a piggyback exception has become available.

Question #34: Can Form 211 applications be faxed to the NASD?

Answer: No. The original Form 211 must be mailed and requires original signatures.

Question #35: If a security on the OTC Bulletin Board appears in the "eligible" status, can a broker/dealer enter quotations without filing a Form 211 application?

Answer: No. The "eligible" status on the OTC Bulletin Board indicates that another broker/dealer has been cleared to quote the security, but the piggyback exception of Rule 15c2-11 has not been met. When the status for a security on the OTC Bulletin Board is "active" a broker/dealer may enter quotes without filing the Form 211 application.

Question #36: What are the filing requirements of Schedule H if another security of the issuer is trading on Nasdaq, i.e., if a broker/dealer wishes to quote the warrants of an issuer that has a common stock listed on Nasdaq?

Answer: Since an issuer that has a security trading on Nasdaq will be a reporting company, the broker/dealer need only submit the Form 211 and indicate on the Form 211, under Rule 15c2-11(a)(3), the reports that the broker/dealer has in its possession. These reports would include the issuer's latest Form 10-K and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks. In this case the Form 211 can be faxed to the NASD.

Question #37: Is there an expedited procedure for listing recently delisted Nasdaq securities on the OTC Bulletin Board?

Answer: Yes. On February 28, 1992, the SEC granted an exemption from Rule 15c2-1 1 for securities that will be delisted from Nasdaq due to the revised listing and maintenance requirements for the Nasdaq Small-Cap Market.SM When these securities are delisted, they will automatically be eligible to quote on the OTC Bulletin Board or any other quotation medium the next business day without the filing of a Form 211, as long as the following requirements are met:

(1) The security must have been traded on Nasdaq for the past 30 days;
(2) The issuer must not be subject to bankruptcy proceedings;
(3) The issuer must be current in its SEC reporting requirements; and
(4) The broker/dealer relying on this exception must have been a market maker in the subject security during the 30 days prior to delisting.

Question #38: Can more than one security of an issuer be included on a Form 211?

Answer: Yes. More than one security for a single issuer may be requested on a single Form 211.

Question #39: Can a broker/dealer accept payment to make a market in an issuer's securities?

Answer: No. A market maker cannot accept any form of compensation, including cash, securities, products, or services, for the purposes of making a market, to cover out-of-pocket expenses for making a market, or for submitting an application to make a market in an issuer's securities. This activity was addressed in Notice to Members 75-16 in 1975.

Question #40: Can a broker/dealer rely on the inside market (high bid, low ask prices) calculated on the OTC Bulletin Board in executing retail transactions?

Answer: No. Broker/dealers cannot execute transactions in non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity securities based on the prices of any non-validated quotations. Members should be aware that the best indication of the prevailing market price is the actual trades that are occurring in the marketplace and not the quotations appearing on the OTC Bulletin Board or other quotation mediums. As the Commission stated in the leading decision of Alstead, Dempsey & Company, Incorporated (SEC Release No. 34-20825, April 5, 1984): "By their very nature, quotations only propose a transaction: they do not reflect the actual result of a completed arms-length sale. Thus, as we have frequently pointed out, quotations for obscure securities with limited inter-dealer trading activity may have little value as evidence of the current market." (See Notice to Members 92-16).

Question #41: If the OTC Bulletin Board displays three firm quotations, is a broker/dealer required by Article III, Sections 1 and 21 (b) of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice, to call the market makers to verify their quotations appearing on the OTC Bulletin Board?

Answer: No. The broker/dealer does not have to call the three market makers to verify the firm quotations that are displayed on the screen. A broker/dealer need only note on the order ticket the identity of the broker/dealers and the firm quotations obtained from the OTC Bulletin Board.

Question #42: If the OTC Bulletin Board has one firm quote and two name only quotations, is the broker/dealer required to call the name-only market makers to determine their quotations?

Answer: Yes. If there are fewer than three firm quotations on the OTC Bulletin Board, the broker/dealer must call the name-only market makers to obtain the three required quotations.

Question #43: What is the broker/dealer's obligation if the OTC Bulletin Board has fewer than three market makers listed?

Answer: The broker/dealer must check the "pink sheets" or any other quotation medium for additional market makers. A market maker in these quotation mediums must be contacted to obtain its current quotations. If three market makers cannot be found, then the broker/dealer need only contact the one or two that were found.

Question #44: If the OTC Bulletin Board has three non-firm priced quotations in a foreign security, must a broker/dealer contact each market maker?

Answer: Yes. Non-firm quotations on the OTC Bulletin Board cannot be used to satisfy the requirement that quotations be obtained from other market makers.
Question #45: Does Rule 15c2-1 1 and Schedule H apply to secondary market transactions in direct participation program securities?

Answer: Yes. Both Rule 15c2-11 and all of the sections of Schedule H apply. Pursuant to Schedule H, Section 4, members are required to submit their Rule 15c2-11 information to the NASD prior to publishing quotations. Moreover, members must report their volume in secondary market transactions, and certain pricing information in direct participation program trading as required by Schedule H, Section 2 of the NASD By-Laws. For more information on trade reporting for these securities, please call Automated Reports at [phone]. In addition, a separate Notice will be issued addressing this subject.

Question #46: Where can a broker/dealer get more information on the subjects discussed in this Notice?

Answer: All interested broker/dealers should read Rule 15c2-11, Commission Release No. 34-29094, Schedule H, Section 4 of the NASD By-Laws, and Notice to Members 90-40. Additionally, the Compliance Division's OTC Compliance Unit [phone] is available throughout the business day and by voice mail during non-business hours to respond to inquiries or to direct the caller to the appropriate party. We encourage members to call with their questions and inquiries.

For more information contact Daniel M. Sibears, Director, Compliance Division, at [phone] or Ken Worm, Manager, OTC Compliance Unit, at [phone]. Also, broker/dealers with questions regarding Rule 15c2-11 may contact the Office of Trading Practices, Division of Market Regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission at [phone].

[lucky, mydog]

As far as becoming solicited it doesn't just happen because a company "files" a 15C2-11 Information sheet at Pink Sheets.

In order to quote solicited a market maker must file a Form 211 and that form must clear comments from the regulators.

Here's a copy of Form 211 and what the MM is required to provide and attest to:

http://www.otcbb.com/aboutOTCBB/forms/form211.pdf

Part 5 – Certification

The undersigned must have a reasonable basis for believing that the information accompanying this
form is accurate in all material respects and that the sources of the information are reliable.

By signing this document, I acknowledge and certify that my firm has a reasonable basis for believing
that the information accompanying this form(including required EDGAR filed documents not
provided)
is accurate in all material respects and that the sources of the information are reliable (“affirmative
review obligation”) as required by Rule 15c2-11 under the 1934 Act and NASD Rule 6640. I understand
and acknowledge that this affirmative review obligation applies to all subsequent submissionsmade
in connection with this Form 211 application. Further, I certify that I have examined this form and, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. I understand and acknowledge
that copies of this form, accompanying documents, and subsequent submissions made in connection
with this Form 211 application may be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or other
regulatory agencies, Pink Sheets LLC, and to the public upon request through the Pink Sheets LLC.


Rule 15c2-11 -- Initiation or Resumption of Quotations without Specified Information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Preliminary Note:

Brokers and dealers may wish to refer to Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29094 (April 17, 1991), for a discussion of procedures for gathering and reviewing the information required by this rule and the requirement that a broker or dealer have a reasonable basis for believing that the information is accurate and obtained from reliable sources.
As a means reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative acts or practices, it shall be unlawful for a broker or dealer to publish any quotation for a security or, directly or indirectly, to submit any such quotation for publication, in any quotation medium (as defined in this section) unless such broker or dealer has in its records the documents and information required by this paragraph (for purposes of this section, "paragraph (a) information"), and, based upon a review of the paragraph (a) information together with any other documents and information required by paragraph (b) of this section, has a reasonable basis under the circumstances for believing that the paragraph (a) information is accurate in all material respects, and that the sources of the paragraph (a) information are reliable. The information required pursuant to this paragraph is:


A copy of the prospectus specified by Section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 for an issuer that has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, other than a registration statement on Form F-6, which became effective less than 90 calendar days prior to the day on which such broker or dealer publishes or submits the quotation to the quotation medium, Provided That such registration statement has not thereafter been the subject of a stop order which is still in effect when the quotation is published or submitted; or

A copy of the offering circular provided for under Regulation A under the Securities Act of 1933 for an issuer that has filed a notification under Regulation A and was authorized to commence the offering less than 40 calendar days prior to the day on which such broker or dealer publishes or submits the quotation to the quotation medium, Provided That the offering circular provided for under Regulation A has not thereafter become the subject of a suspension order which is still in effect when the quotation is published or submitted; or


A copy of the issuer's most recent annual report filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act or a copy of the annual statement referred to in Section 12(g)(2)(G)(i) of the Act, in the case of an issuer required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act or an issuer of a security covered by Section 12(g)(2)(B) or (G) of the Act, together with any quarterly and current reports that have been filed under the provisions of the Act by the issuer after such annual report or annual statement; Provided, however, That until such issuer has filed its first annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act or annual statement referred to in Section 12(g)(2)(G)(i) of the Act, the broker or dealer has in its records a copy of the prospectus specified by Section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 included in a registration statement filed by the issuer under the Securities Act of 1933, other than a registration statement on Form F-6, that became effective within the prior 16 months, or a copy of any registration statement filed by the issuer under Section 12 of the Act that became effective within the prior 16 months, together with any quarterly and current reports filed thereafter under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act; and Provided further, That the broker or dealer has a reasonable basis under the circumstances for believing that the issuer is current in filing annual, quarterly, and current reports filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act, or, in the case of an insurance company exempted from Section 12(g) of the Act by reason of Section 12(g)(2)(G) thereof, the annual statement referred to in Section 12(g)(2)(G)(i) of the Act; or


The information that, since the beginning of its last fiscal year, the issuer has published pursuant to Rule 240.12g3-2(b), and which the broker or dealer shall make reasonably available upon the request of a person expressing an interest in a proposed transaction in the issuer's security with the broker or dealer, such as by providing the requesting person with appropriate instructions regarding how to obtain the information electronically; or

The following information, which shall be reasonably current in relation to the day the quotation is submitted and which the broker or dealer shall make reasonably available upon request to any person expressing an interest in a proposed transaction in the security with such broker or dealer:


the exact name of the issuer and its predecessor (if any);


the address of its principal executive offices;


the state of incorporation, if it is a corporation;


the exact title and class of the security;


the par or stated value of the security;


the number of shares or total amount of the securities outstanding as of the end of the issuer's most recent fiscal year;


the name and address of the transfer agent;


the nature of the issuer's business;


the nature of products or services offered;


the nature and extent of the issuer's facilities;


the name of the chief executive officer and members of the board of directors;


the issuer's most recent balance sheet and profit and loss and retained earnings statements;


similar financial information for such part of the 2 preceding fiscal years as the issuer or its predecessor has been in existence;


whether the broker or dealer or any associated person is affiliated, directly or indirectly with the issuer;


whether the quotation is being published or submitted on behalf of any other broker or dealer, and, if so, the name of such broker or dealer; and


whether the quotation is being submitted or published directly or indirectly on behalf of the issuer, or any director, officer or any person, directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of the outstanding units or shares of any equity security of the issuer, and, if so, the name of such person, and the basis for any exemption under the federal securities laws for any sales of such securities on behalf of such person.

If such information is made available to others upon request pursuant to this paragraph, such delivery, unless otherwise represented, shall not constitute a representation by such broker or dealer that such information is accurate, but shall constitute a representation by such broker or dealer that the information is reasonably current in relation to the day the quotation is submitted, that the broker or dealer has a reasonable basis under the circumstances for believing the information is accurate in all material respects, and that the information was obtained from sources which the broker or dealer has a reasonable basis for believing are reliable. This paragraph (a)(5) shall not apply to any security of an issuer included in paragraph (a)(3) of this Section unless a report or statement of such issuer described in paragraph (a)(3) of this Section is not reasonably available to the broker or dealer. A report or statement of an issuer described in paragraph (a)(3) of this Section shall be "reasonably available" when such report or statement is filed with the Commission.


With respect to any security the quotation of which is within the provisions of this Section, the broker or dealer submitting or publishing such quotation shall have in its records the following documents and information:


A record of the circumstances involved in the submission of publication of such quotation, including the identity of the person or persons for whom the quotation is being submitted or published and any information regarding the transactions provided to the broker or dealer by such person or persons;


A copy of any trading suspension order issued by the Commission pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Act respecting any securities of the issuer or its predecessor (if any) during the 12 months preceding the date of the publication or submission of the quotation, or a copy of the public release issued by the Commission announcing such trading suspension order; and


A copy or a written record of any other material information (including adverse information) regarding the issuer which comes to the broker's or dealer's knowledge or possession before the publication or submission of the quotation.


The broker or dealer shall preserve the documents and information required under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section for a period of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily accessible place.



For any security of an issuer included in paragraph (a)(5) of this Section, the broker or dealer submitting the quotation shall furnish to the interdealer quotation system (as defined in paragraph (e)(2) of this Section), in such form as such system shall prescribe, at least 3 business days before the quotation is published or submitted, the information regarding the security and the issuer which such broker or dealer is required to maintain pursuant to said paragraph (a)(5) of this Section.


For any security of an issuer included in paragraph (a)(3) of this Section,


a broker-dealer shall be in compliance with the requirement to obtain current reports filed by the issuer if the broker-dealer obtains all current reports filed with the Commission by the issuer as of a date up to five business days in advance of the earlier of the date of submission of the quotation to the quotation medium and the date of submission of the paragraph (a) information pursuant to Schedule H of the By-Laws of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; and


a broker-dealer shall be in compliance with the requirement to obtain the annual, quarterly, and current reports filed by the issuer, if the broker-dealer has made arrangements to receive all such reports when filed by the issuer and it has regularly received reports from the issuer on a timely basis, unless the broker-dealer has a reasonable basis under the circumstances for believing that the issuer has failed to file a required report or has filed a report but has not sent it to the broker-dealer.


For purposes of this Section:


"Quotation medium" shall mean any "interdealer quotation system" or any publication or electronic communications network or other device which is used by brokers or dealers to make known to others their interest in transactions in any security, including offers to buy or sell at a stated price or otherwise, or invitations of offers to buy or sell.


"inter-dealer quotation system" shall mean any system of general circulation to brokers or dealers which regularly disseminates quotations of identified brokers or dealers.


Except as otherwise specified in this rule, "quotation" shall mean any bid or offer at a specified price with respect to a security, or any indication of interest by a broker or dealer in receiving bids or offers from others for a security, or any indication by a broker or dealer that he wishes to advertise his general interest in buying or selling a particular security.


"Issuer", in the case of quotations for American Depositary Receipts, shall mean the issuer of the deposited shares represented by such American Depositary Receipts.


The provisions of this Section shall not apply to:


The publication or submission of a quotation respecting a security admitted to trading on a national securities exchange and which is traded on such an exchange on the same day as, or on the business day next preceding, the day the quotation is published or submitted.


The publication or submission by a broker or dealer, solely on behalf of a customer (other than a person acting as or for a dealer), of a quotation that represents the customer's indication of interest and does not involve the solicitation of the customer's interest; Provided, however, That this paragraph (f)(2) shall not apply to a quotation consisting of both a bid and an offer, each of which is at a specified price, unless the quotation medium specifically identifies the quotation as representing such an unsolicited customer interest.





The publication or submission, in an interdealer quotation system that specifically identifies as such unsolicited customer indications of interest of the kind described in paragraph (f)(2) of this Section, of a quotation respecting a security which has been the subject of quotations (exclusive of any identified customer interests) in such a system on each of at least 12 days within the previous 30 calendar days, with no more than 4 business days in succession without a quotation; or


The publication or submission, in an interdealer quotation system that does not so identify any such unsolicited customer indications of interest, of a quotation respecting a security which has been the subject of both bid and ask quotations in an interdealer quotation system at specified prices on each of at least 12 days within the previous 30 calendar days, with no more than 4 business days in succession without such a two-way quotation;


A dealer acting in the capacity of market maker, as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Act, that has published or submitted a quotation respecting a security in an interdealer quotation system and such quotation has qualified for an exception provided in this paragraph (f)(3), may continue to publish or submit quotations for such security in the interdealer quotation system without compliance with this Section unless and until such dealer ceases to submit or publish a quotation or ceases to act in the capacity of market maker respecting such security.


The publication or submission of a quotation respecting a municipal security.


(5) The publication or submission of a quotation respecting a Nasdaq security (as defined in Rule 242.600 of this chapter), and such security's listing is not suspended, terminated, or prohibited.


The requirement in subparagraph (a)(5) that the information with respect to the issuer be "reasonably current" will be presumed to be satisfied, unless the broker or dealer has information to the contrary, if:


The balance sheet is as of a date less than 16 months before the publication or submission of the quotation, the statements of profit and loss and retained earnings are for the 12 months preceding the date of such balance sheet, and if such balance sheet is not as of a date less than 6 months before the publication or submission of the quotation, it shall be accompanied by additional statements of profit and loss and retained earnings for the period from the date of such balance sheet to a date less than 6 months before the publication or submission of the quotation.


Other information regarding the issuer specified in subparagraph (a)(5) is as of a date within 12 months prior to the publication or submission of the quotation.


This Section shall not prohibit any publication or submission of any quotation if the Commission, upon written request or upon its own motion, exempts such quotation either unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions, as not constituting a fraudulent, manipulative or deceptive practice comprehended within the purpose of this Rule.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[David i INVEST]

EMXC SCAM PLEASE NOTE DENNY IS SUPPOSED TO BE A WORKER BEE HERE at EMXC and/or maybe MPIX: (THIS IS JUST A SCAM)


LOOK at his updated site; CAN YOU SHOW ME WHERE HE PUBLIC HAS STATED HE IS STILL INVOLVED? Chronology Order of his works.



1965-1968

Little Darlin’ Music Co. - Production/Publishing Co.
Creative Director






Holiday Records - Independent record co.
Artist and Label Manager



1968-1972

Peer/Southern Organization
West Coast Director



1972-1978

United Artists Records
Vice President Pop A&R/ Producer



1978-1980

RCA/Windsong Records
Vice President A&R/ Producer



1980-1981

CBS Songs
Vice President and Creative Director/ Producer



1981-1989

CBS/Columbia Records
Vice President A&R/ Producer



1989-1996

MCA Records
Vice President A&R/ Producer



1996-2010

Pipeline Music Inc.
President and co-founder



2007

DD Productions Inc. a Record and Film Production Co.
President and co-founder



2008

Partners In Rhyme LLC
Co-founder



2010

Jukebox Music Productions LLC
Owner



2011

RADIOICONS.COM
President





New Jersey Center for Media Arts
A&R Consultant
. No mention of ROX, EMXC or MPIX:




http://www.dennydiante.com/denny_diante_chronology.html

[Draconis]

Rox if offered help. Please take it for all our sakes.


Thanks Reaper for the response :)

[graydave]

Thank you for giving EMAX and Mindpix investors and potential investors your valuable time and expertise

[Kool Aid Man]

Gateways To Space aka EMAX $2 million judgment

Did you see this? Chuck and Roxy bought a shell that had a $2 million foreign judgment against it! Now THAT is some kind of brilliant business expertise.. LMAO.

http://or.occompt.com/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/27590692.pdf?id=DOCC27590692.A0&parent=DOCC27590692

http://or.occompt.com/recorder/eagleweb/viewDoc.jsp?node=DOCC27590692

[Ihubreaper]

Getting off grey isn't easy. Lots of paperwork and need MM to approve 211. Is it possible.... Yes. Is it easy... No.

Get her filing up to date
Find an MM to submit 211

The best thing for emxc shareholders is the mpix deal a bust. Emax media back under worldwide. Which means Diante is here which is Her best bet to get it moving. By herself, no way.

Also 3k shareholders on record helps. MMs see that and see they can make money from all those shares. SEC is not out to punish shareholders.

Again she needs someone who knows how to operate in pinks and OTC. Apparently so far she and company have no clue.

As simple as keeping security details on OTC up to date, board members, SS, IR firm, law firm, Etc. do the simple things but do them very well.

Good luck. I really hope it all works out.

[Draconis]

Do you think it is possible for her to uplist off the grey sheets?

She needs a form 211 I understand but what does that really mean? Does it just mean filing current information?

Even if the real numbers are terrible wouldn't it still be worth it to resurrect the stock or is there more to it?

Also as you pointed out since she has mentioned many times about the buyback just spending a few k at the price now would go a long way and she would at least deliver on something she promised?

[Ihubreaper]

With this many shareholders on record......

If the company doesnt come up with a way to repay shareholders by EOY, I believe you will see a legitimate lawsuit against webber and other directors.

The more I read about this company and broken promises, the deeper their problems are.

For instance..... Stock prices dropped just before they announced the 50 loan deal was a bust. I can guarantee there was some email traffic or just verify major stock sells right before.
If any shareholder was aware of that the loan was a bust before announcing to the rest , major problems there. Just my opinion

They never rescinded their housewives of India deal

Song a month. What happen to that

Dividends...... Needs to take care if that . She will pay now or later for the divs owed.

They apparently owe IR reps for services. Some were paid with shares as some were promised preferred shares which they never received

Buy back never happened. Many blogs and prs state buy back will continue or will start. Contradicting statements.

DUi no big deal to me. Happens to the best of people.

States in some blogs all companies making money..... Didn't see that in unaudited fins. That is a major no no

Her best bet is to make Money with emax media and mpix and get money to investors.

Mpix recently updated some filings on OTC. My guess trying get yield sign off. Should happen I would think.

Or use funds to buy her own stock back up. If that happens then u will defiantly see dilution at some point

If this Diante fella can't help her. Doomsday. ..... Bankruptcy will happen

3 k shareholders..... Oh ya they will fight for their money back. They will take the shirts off all directors and affiliates backs if they have to.

All my opinion. Some friends wanted an honest opinion about this stock and they got it.

[David i INVEST]

EMAX ROX MPIX Denny Diante SCAM Denny is a 3 decades old has been. he has zero clout in the music industry today. he could not even put together a old man cane walking trio singing on a Asbury Park, NJ beach stage on a July 4th weekend.

The real news is that she used his name for many months already( check the website of emax media, etc.) and it did nothing for the stock or company or company revenues.
The media library is worthless. It has zero value. She owns nothing. If she did EMXC would be trading. She does not even have the exclusivity on any of it either. The resale arrangements and agreements are highly complicated, often discussed in these boards in the past, and you and I can use these music anywhere without her permission or pay her company anything. If you do not think the above is so then I can give you an extensive list of owners and agents and trustees and even managers of the artists and that is public knowledge. I do not know of a more transparent industry than music that allows for this as almost all these artists live off royalties from those that call to use them in advertising and such. My cousin is in that industry in Los Angeles. I asked him about her company and business and he said that she has non exclusive rights to sell anything in a multiple listing type arrangement. Anyone who wants to can do the same.

Do you think the family of Mike Jackson or Streisand or Presley or Sinatra or 100 other names she dropped would even have coffee, let alone give her an exclusive? The incredible BS that surronds her and her companies and the rapidity of the excrement that follows is mind boggling. In fact is is even embarrassing.

[Draconis]

lol, now that would put a nice spin on things.

[sparkie812]

maybe its the evil twin sister LOL!!!!

[Draconis]

lol... That depends on which you are talking about whether or not I could give you a definite imo answer????

[mulligan43]

soooooo
what are the chanced my dividend will be delivered soon??

[Draconis]

Rox your wasting time and money!!!

MPIX relies on you repairing investor trust here at EMXC. Bring EMXC current then start your PR blitz otherwise MPIX will never get off the ground.

I'm not even gonna charge you for that free advice.

[Draconis]

I just hope the camera's were there and we will get to see it on an episode of cops one day!!!

[Draconis]

I guess dui and running from police isn't a serious offense. I wish the judge was an EMXC shareholder, prolly wouldn't have been so nice....

[Kool Aid Man]

ALIAS: "Roxanna Lou Green" --Felony DUI

FYI


Charge 1
STATUTE: 316.1935(2)-2
CHARGE: FLEEING and ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER w/SIREN & LIGHTS ACTIVE.

Charge 2
STATUTE: 843.02
CHARGE: RESISTING OFFICER WITHOUT VIOLENCE

Charge 3
STATUTE: 316.193(1)-2
CHARGE: DUI - DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE
http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Orange-County-FL/Roxanna-Lou-Green/details/

DC Number: X77612
Name: GREEN, ROXANNA LOU
Race: WHITE
Sex: FEMALE
Hair Color: BROWN
Eye Color: BROWN
Height: 5'06''
Weight: 160 lbs.
Birth Date: 05/02/1963
Supervision Begin Date: 01/20/2012
Current Location: ORLANDO
Current Status: ACTIVE
Supervision Type: PROBATION FELONY
Scheduled Termination Date: 01/19/2015

Current Verified PERMANENT Address:
11449 LAKE BUTLER BLVD
WINDERMERE, FL 34786

Aliases:
ROXANNA LOU GREEN ROXANNA LOU WEBER

Current Community Supervision History:
Offense Date: 06/17/2011
Offense: WILLFUL FLEE/ELUDE LEO
Sentence Date: 01/20/2012
County: ORANGE
Case No. 1108234
Community Supervision Length: 3Y 0M 0D

Current Community Supervision History:
Offense Date: 06/17/2011
Offense: DUI-MISD
Sentence Date: 01/20/2012
County: ORANGE
Case No. 1108234
Community Supervision Length: 1Y 0M 0D

Florida Department of Corrections
http://www.dc.state.fl.us/ActiveOffenders/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=428995755

Her "community supervision"/ probation runs until 1/19/2015

Roxanna married Matthew "Chuck" Weber 20 years ago. She signs all official corporate filings "Roxanna Weber" and is listed in court cases by that name. So how come she's able to present a drivers license to police in the name "Roxanna Lou Green"???

[pire]

She has crossed me off her list after her making a threat at me. Made me laugh! Wonder what the SEC is doing about this. They do not disclose info as we all know.

[Draconis]

I'm scouring for news of an MM that would sponser this and turning up nothing. Prolly just a change of hands to keep some life going because MPIX is trying to launch, but I would wager a lot of MPIX SH are EMXC and we know the real deal.

[forttwin]

So who knows what the trading is about today?

[Draconis]

Well good, Maybe a P.I. can follow her(Pire) get her on tape for a minor offense and report her. Then she goes to jail, she deserves much worse, and then we can have a shareholder vote and place a new CEO :).

jmo of course.

[David i INVEST]

EMXC SCAM SHE Does not care about the investor. She runs from the cops and has a police record that shows that. Not only that but she used a maiden name on her lic after she has said her name. She is a lie!!!! That all she knows how to do...

[Draconis]

Form 211?? Will that show up on either site if they file??

http://www.dtcc.com/legal/imp_notices/nscc/otc/2012.php

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000830519&owner=exclude&count=40

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/EMXC/filings

Could really use an update Rox, MPIX isn't launching without a repair here!!

[David i INVEST]

EMXC AND MPIX SCAM FACTS ARE THIEFS RUN!!!. SHE NOW HAS A POLICE RECORD OF IT. FACTS are a true to consider when investing as look what she has done to the invetors here. EMXC and MPIX are releated in press releases. SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS SHELL SCAM SHE IS RUNNING!!!!

[no_brag_just_fact]

this is a crying shame!!! what a &((&%T$+D SHAME!!!

NB

[David i INVEST]

EMXC SCAM Ironic MPIX (which since is documented that they had talked once of being partners). Some investors are not concerned about her past or convictions. Running from the law speaks big as she is runing from the investors of EMXC. Some people here should jump on and tell people about her scam on the mpix board if they have not. She probally will start another SCAM soon as it is her game. IS it not shocking to you that she hanged out with all of the known felons in her past. They run in groups

[xjag]

Felony probation rules require that the probationer refrain from criminal activity. Perhaps someone should contact Weber's probation officer and alert them to her stock scams. The rules of evidence are almost non-existent when it comes to revoking someone's probation. She could be incarcerated with a simple hearing before the sentencing judge.

[Draconis]

Our Charming CEO, Brought to you by R/A.

Who knew Roxanna was arrested for DUI, attempting to flee and allude law enforcement and resisting arrest? These are felony charges and it appears she's on felony probation. Looks like Roxanna lied in the MPIX Annual Report. Below is her mugshot, and interestingly enough she's using her maiden name. Roxanna L. Green is Roxanna L. Weber. IMO, these were felony's, and this should have been disclosed to shareholders.

http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Orange-County-FL/Roxanna-Lou-Green/details/

[pizzaclown]

Emax media would probably be the new mother ship. She gives emxc shareholders shares of emax media Or similar type of share swapping.

This crossed my mind too.

[Ihubreaper]

Webber will find a way to get her money back. They still own a lot of shares

With emax media back under her wing I would guess that is her ticket back on helping emxc shareholders and herself. Also, a lot of IOUs out with those shares. Just a guess.

Emax media would probably be the new mother ship. She gives emxc shareholders shares of emax media Or similar type of share swapping.

Her best option at this point. Will it happen....no idea.

[David i INVEST]

I expect scam EMAX and ROX

[inti23]

emxc what to expect , scam or not?

[Draconis]

We will continue to keep our shareholders and the investment community informed of our progress on a regular basis.

How's it going its been 2 months!??

[apapafor8]

Rox is a complete lair and scam artist. She does not care about shareholders. This is dead and MPIX is next. Sad but true look at the facts and all her BS for years.

[QaB2i]

Walk on water too?

movin on

[Ihubreaper]

Just my opinion

I don't have a dog in the fight in any which way. I hope it all works out for you. But I say it as I see it. She fixed her first two hurdles. 15 form and cancel of mpix merger. 211 form is next may take some time. That will get back on pinks. Then attempt to get shareholder trust. Tough one to do without some great results


Step by step. If she can retire additional shares. That has the appearance of buyback sometimes.


A lot to do so many shareholders. Avg seems to around 14 for most holders. So patience and time for them. Hope it all works out for u

[Draconis]

Hope anything you said comes to light, its unfortunate its all based on Rox being incompetent and not a scammer, but I will hope for the Former.

[pizzaclown]

Good stuff!

[Ihubreaper]

My opinion....lol.

Many things have to happen before emxc gets back on track

Hopefully she found an MM to submit proper firms to get back in pinks. I believe she will.

Reason is this, over 2k shareholders. They were suspended for two reasons: filing improper 15 form and merger with mpix. Apparently she fixes both issues. There is money to be made on emxc with over 2k shareholders so I believe she will find MM to support emxc

I don't care what anyone states here SEC is here to protect investors not punish incompetent CEOs

With emax media back under emxc should see some profit with Diante and mpix.
I have read numerous past prs nothing seem to come to light. Don't think she lied about them at time of submitting but weren't thought out.

She needs someone to writer her prs and has an understanding of the OTC. Apparently she doesn't

If she needs money and she owns a lot of shares. I expect her to bring it back up some how. If so expect a lot of dilution at some point.

I don't own any shares of any penny stock.

[DR_WHODAT09]

Ihubreaper......whats your thoughts on EMXC? You likes? I value your opinion!

[Ihubreaper]

She sent u a threatening email? What did it say?

[Daily Dollars]

Because EOD retail buys took $MPIX green 44%+ that makes it awkward...Ok I get it.. that's a new one on me. lol
oh dear

MPIX as yesterday had some very awkward volume

[Draconis]

I was just curious her angle and if it wasn't money then it had to be buying time maybe to make a final play on MPIX as yesterday had some very awkward volume. Obviously EMXC wasn't uplisted and that letter is at least 2 weeks old at this point.

If MPIX shoots today how can it not be obvious insider information going around??

The only legal insider buy she could do would be on EMXC as she has announced countless times about a buyback.

Oh well today should prove interesting, either SEC is going to stop MPIX as it did EMXC or tomorrow could be MPIX's last play.

[apapafor8]

SEC is on to her news soon IMO about fraud.

[apapafor8]

All in LOL