eMax Holdings, Inc. (fka EMXC)

[RZN]

This is old news

[pumper_stumper]

She did it again! A/S up to 5billion shares!

Ladies and Gentlemen, the queen magician of multiplying shares did it again.... but she somehow didn't think to announce it... again! lol That's right, on August 1st, slick Roxie increased the authorization as follows, from her words in the filing: "The company is increasing their authorized common shares from 2,000,000 to 5,000,000,000 shares.

Put the drink down and take a bow Roxie! To 5 billion we go!!!!

I guess the upside is the AS is almost maxed. As long as it isn't increased

So much for it not increasing, right Pittsburghchillin?

[RZN]

Not sure.

[pumper_stumper]

Can you tell me what the "substance" was for the billions in increases in authorized shares over the past 9 years? This was $3 stock, split adjusted, in 2003, with 100 million authorized shares. Please list for us the "substance" for each year's increase below.

Outstanding Shares
12/31/2000 15,157,733
12/31/2001 36,219,733
12/31/2002 45,664,733
12/31/2003 65,734,733
3/31/2004 98,984,733 (3 months)
3/31/2004 14:1 reverse split 3/2004 98,984,733 old = 7,070,338 post split shares
6/30/2004 7,070,338
12/31/2004 15,738,497
12/31/2005 27,848,497
12/31/2006 137,693,722
12/31/2007 387,787,105
12/31/2008 1,378,065,364
12/31/2009 1,378,065,364
12/31/2010 2,291,972,864
Current....3,279,025,918

[RZN]

Only if there was no substance behind the decision

[David i INVEST]

PLease share this on mpix as well:

also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "


Interesting to also note she used a different ID then WEBBER as MPIX as she has claimed for many years. Was that the same as using a different company? But hey as I have heard before I am not married to this company.


also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation.

[David i INVEST]

PLease share this on mpix as well:

also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "


Interesting to also note she used a different ID then WEBBER as MPIX as she has claimed for many years. Was that the same as using a different company? But hey as I have heard before I am not married to this company.


also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "

[David i INVEST]

I heard some recent picture where up for her on the MPIX board here

[pumper_stumper]

Has anyone heard from slick Roxie directly? Has she given up on the personal emails telling people how things are "looking good", and "you'll see big news ahead"? When was the last known slick Roxie contact to a shareholder?

[pumper_stumper]

So if the A/S gets increased significantly, say by a few billion, you would agree that would be awful for EMXC shareholders, correct?

I guess the upside is the AS is almost maxed. As long as it isn't increased

[Anticipating]

Wow what a scam artist.......

[RZN]

I guess the upside is the AS is almost maxed. As long as it isn't increased

[David i INVEST]

is this emax or mpix or rox's circus. LOL she spinning a new web yet.

[pumper_stumper]

Hey, any word on a progress of the Emax "buyback"? I think we need a good laugh. What's the progress now? We have documented over a billion new shares in dilution this year... how about the "buyback"?

[pumper_stumper]

Emax's biggest "product" is producing shares and diluting their "investors" as they cheer on the slick Roxy and the gang.

Year....Number of shares created, Roxanna Weber CEO

2001.....21,062,000
2002.....9,445,000
2003.....20,070,000
2004.....41,918,159
2005.....12,110,000
2006.....109,845,225
2007.....250,093,383
2008.....990,278,259
2010.....913,907,500
2011.....734,000,000
2011....1,560,442,691
2012....1,718,583,227

This means if you owned the all the shares in 2001 and held them until now, you would have gone from owning 100% of Emax, to less than 1% of Emax! lol

source - Emax filings

2012 was a VERY good year for dilution!

Shares Outstanding 3,279,025,918 a/o Aug 02, 2012
Float 2,400,062,000 a/o Aug 02, 2012
Authorized Shares 3,500,000,000 a/o Aug 02, 2012

[David i INVEST]

Convicted felon was/is in charge of emax. ROX Remember, that fleeing or eluding cases are treated very severely by the judges and prosecution and the prosecution will do all its best to prove you guilty of all the offenses you have been charged with. Given the impact it will have on your driver’s license, the possibility of a prison sentence and heavy fines...

You can be charged of fleeing to elude if you willingly or knowingly refused to stop your vehicle after being ordered by a duly authorized law enforcement officer. The officer should be in uniform when he or she orders you to stop.

In the case if you willfully or purposely fled your vehicle after having stopped when the police officer ordered you too, that will also be considered as fleeing to elude. The law only applies to vehicles being driven on a street or highway in Florida.

At the time of fleeing, if the officer has lights and sirens activated in their vehicle, but you still drove away, you will face extra penalties. Similarly, if there was a high speed chase after you drove away with high speed or reckless driving, causing serious bodily injury or death of another person, then the charges against you will increase considerably.

Penalties for Fleeing to Elude in Orlando, Florida

The state of Florida takes fleeing to elude very seriously. The base offense of Fleeing to Elude a law enforcement officer is classified as a Third Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 1 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. In such cases, the judge can impose up to 5 years in prison with up to 5 years of probation along with a maximum of $5,000 in fines. The driver’s license is also suspended for a minimum of 1 year up to a maximum of 5 years.

If you fled the police officer with lights and sirens activated, it is classified as a Third Degree Felony and is assigned as a Level 3 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. The penalties for this offense are the same as that of the base offense, but the judge will impose punishments towards the higher side.

Fleeing and eluding with lights and sirens activated with high speed or reckless driving is classified as a Second Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 4 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. The penalties include up to 15 years in prison and up to 15 years of probation along with up to $10,000 in fines. The driver license is also suspended for a minimum period of 1 year and a maximum of 5 years.

If during the chase, you cause serious bodily injury or death, it will be classified as a First Degree Felony and assigned a Level 7 offense under Florida’s law. In such cases, the judge will impose a minimum mandatory jail sentence of 3 years. Additional penalties include up to 30 years in prison and up to 30 years of probation with a maximum of $10,000 in fines. The driver’s license is also suspended for a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 5 years.

[David i INVEST]

NO Website is working still hmmm

[Penny Powers]

I am forwarding this letter to you regarding our phone conversation Thursday, April 5th 2012 inquiring about the report filing requirements needed by eMax Holdings Corp (also known as eMax Worldwide, Inc.) to once again become fully reporting with your agency.



For over three years now, eMax has retained the firm McMullen Associates as our securities counsel to assist with reporting to your agency. Unfortunately, at this time it appears that the firm has yet to perform while payments are still being made. Last year after receiving the first correspondence from your office, I submitted the letter to our securities counsel and was instructed to write a response stating that they would be in contact with you. At this time, I realize there is a great possibility that they never contacted you, even though we requested follow up numerous occasions.



I know, as the CEO, I am fully responsible for the filings of the company. Now I find myself in a horrible situation as we are under a temporary suspension. We have tried to speak to our securities counsel directly all week to get an answer regarding this matter and have found them unattainable.



With this known fact, I contacted you directly and humbly request the following:



1.) A six month period allowance to submit 3 years of 10Q's and 10K's with audited financials, for the sole purpose of becoming fully reporting again with the SEC. This will provide us with enough time to secure new securities counsel that can work with our auditors.



2.) Allow for us to file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in error and is withdrawn.



3.) We will register such re-sales or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that we believe is available and as relating to the event listed here and as noted in your letter to our office dated January 26, 2012 “The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. will issue 400,000,000 shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in EMXC. This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc.”



Anyone know status of this ?


Dear Mr. Lopez


Provided below is a copy of the correspondence that was sent to our office dated January 26, 2012. As previously directed by our securities counsel attached you will find the letter we first sent to your office on July 14, 2011.



At this time, I wish to thank you for your time, consideration and understanding in this important matter. I would be humbly appreciative if we were allowed the time requested to file the necessary reports to your office and as for the reason we are retaining new securities counsel to aid our office with these filing responsibilities.

Sincerely Roxanne Webber

[David i INVEST]

Mrs. Roxanna Weber Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of eMax Worldwide WITCH IS FOUND

[David i INVEST]

ROX IS THE THEME AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS!

[David i INVEST]

MPIX EMXC what have they Shared ROX!!!! DENNY!!! cool chill

[machiavelli01]

lol just found it wondering out loud

[graydave]

Come on. You were expecting to hear something? We are major bagholders. This thing is dead. Only hope is she gets sued or goes to jail.

[machiavelli01]

found this been 6 months anyone hear anythin:



Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington DC 20549



Att: James Lopez (for) John Reynolds

Assistant Director



Tuesday, April 10, 2012



Dear Mr Lopez,



I am forwarding this letter to you regarding our phone conversation Thursday, April 5th 2012 inquiring about the report filing requirements needed by eMax Holdings Corp (also known as eMax Worldwide, Inc.) to once again become fully reporting with your agency.



For over three years now, eMax has retained the firm McMullen Associates as our securities counsel to assist with reporting to your agency. Unfortunately, at this time it appears that the firm has yet to perform while payments are still being made. Last year after receiving the first correspondence from your office, I submitted the letter to our securities counsel and was instructed to write a response stating that they would be in contact with you. At this time, I realize there is a great possibility that they never contacted you, even though we requested follow up numerous occasions.



I know, as the CEO, I am fully responsible for the filings of the company. Now I find myself in a horrible situation as we are under a temporary suspension. We have tried to speak to our securities counsel directly all week to get an answer regarding this matter and have found them unattainable.



With this known fact, I contacted you directly and humbly request the following:



1.) A six month period allowance to submit 3 years of 10Q's and 10K's with audited financials, for the sole purpose of becoming fully reporting again with the SEC. This will provide us with enough time to secure new securities counsel that can work with our auditors.



2.) Allow for us to file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in error and is withdrawn.



3.) We will register such re-sales or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that we believe is available and as relating to the event listed here and as noted in your letter to our office dated January 26, 2012 “The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. will issue 400,000,000 shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in EMXC. This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc.”





Provided below is a copy of the correspondence that was sent to our office dated January 26, 2012. As previously directed by our securities counsel attached you will find the letter we first sent to your office on July 14, 2011.



At this time, I wish to thank you for your time, consideration and understanding in this important matter. I would be humbly appreciative if we were allowed the time requested to file the necessary reports to your office and as for the reason we are retaining new securities counsel to aid our office with these filing responsibilities.



Sincerely Yours,



Roxanna Weber

S/Roxanna Weber

CEO/Chairman





Attachments



1. Letter from the SEC to eMax Worldwide, Inc.



January 26, 2012

Via E-mail

Roxanna Weber

Chairman, President and Director

eMax Worldwide, Inc.

1512 South 1100 East, Suite B

Salt Lake City, UT 84105



Re: eMax Worldwide, Inc.

Form 15

Filed January 9, 2012

File No. 033-20394-D



Dear Ms. Weber:



We note that eMax Worldwide, Inc. filed a Form 15 on January 9, 2012 indicating there

are approximately 2,881 holders of record of your common stock. As requested in our March

28, 2011 letter, please file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in

error and is withdrawn. In the event eMax Worldwide, Inc. decides to appeal the Division’s

decision and not withdraw the Form 15, you should follow the procedures for doing so on the

Securities and Exchange Commission’s website. Those procedures can be found at:

http://www.sec.gov/info/edgar/cfedgarguidance.htm.

We further note the outstanding comments from our letter dated June 30, 2011 regarding

your Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2011. We re-issue the following comments, as we have not

received a response as of the date of this letter. Please file all required reports, including any

past due reports, and respond to our comments below within ten business days. If you do not

believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

1. The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. “will issue 400,000,000

shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax

Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common

stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in

EMXC.” This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to

be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the

shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc. Please advise us as to why you believe

registration under the Securities Act of 1933 is not required. See Division of Corporation

Finance Staff Legal Bulletin No. 4, Sept. 16, 1997, available at

http://www.sec.gov/interps/legal/slbcf4.txt.

Roxanna Weber

eMax Worldwide, Inc.

January 26, 2012







Page 2



2. It appears that the recipients of Mindpix Corp.’s shares would act as underwriters in

resales of those shares, requiring registration under the Securities Act of 1933 for such

resales, absent an available exemption. Please confirm that you will register such resales

or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that you believe is available.



3. It appears that eMax Worldwide, Inc. continues to have a duty to file reports under

Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Please file all required periodic

reports, including any past due reports.



Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by

providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested

response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not

believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.

You may contact Erin Wilson at [phone] or James Lopez at [phone] with

any questions.



Sincerely,

/s/ James Lopez (for)

John Reynolds

Assistant Director





2. Letter sent to your office from eMax Worldwide



July 14, 2011

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington DC 20549



To Whom It May Concern,



As it pertains to your letter dated Jun 30, 2011, please know that our office has

forwarded this letter to our legal securities counsel

McMullen And Associates LLC

10701 McMullen Creek Parkway

Charlotte, NC28226

for and your office can expect correspondence from their office and answering your questions correctly as soon as possible.



As it stands however, our office does plan to properly file through our legal securities office all necessary reports and filings that are required for our company to become fully reporting and regarding all dividends that are being issued in our company eMax Worldwide in addition to announced dividends related to the company Mindpix, Corp,



Should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact our office or Mr McMullen office directly.



Sincerely Yours,



Roxanna Weber, President. And CEO


http://www.macreportmedia.com/ViewSubmission....uest=13996

[Penny Powers]

Chill finally at mpix well done webber u crashed two syms

[David i INVEST]

COOL info on ROX and EMXC go to the mpix board too. they think they are real some people still do

[machiavelli01]

well it was paying 5k a month in the last place can imagine what it is now??

[David i INVEST]

yeah but i think if she owns an expsensive car we will know where the money is going was my thought.

[machiavelli01]

the company rented them a new house i heard hmmm lets see if we can find that addy should be in the filings huh. well prolly under that line item expense

[machiavelli01]

last time i saw her vasker was driving her around she has no license remember

[David i INVEST]

the major shareholder rox what type of car is she driving now? Is she living at the office?

[Alilstockman]

Get your money upfront it's your best chance

[machiavelli01]

they are coming lil at a time i want friends to be able to leave with their asses intact Im comin roxie!!! Your days of running over people are done. Good christian woman......

[David i INVEST]

who is a fan here of rox?

[David i INVEST]

facts are good. what say?

[machiavelli01]

no im not bud do i look like a promoter lol Im going to promoter the truth as with facts that i have in my posession ;o)

[machiavelli01]

pitt the chit is finally hitting the fan

[pumper_stumper]

Very funny.. I just pulled up the "client" page from the ex Emax IR firm. Take a look and have a laugh

http://rockportequityllc.com/clients.html

Looks like David might be back to selling cars! He has the same amout of clients as Emax has CDs in retail stores!

Isn't it odd? David has suddenly nothing good to say about Emax since they stopped paying him? Gee! lol

[pumper_stumper]

Anyone hear from the ex used car salesman EMXC IR rep, David Helmcamp? Last I heard, about six months ago he was ranting about papers being filed in a "few weeks" that would enable this POS to get back on the pinks. I think at this point even the pink sheet investors understand that isn't going to happen. Well, most of them at least.

Is David still ranting about Emax? Is he back selling used cars?

[Penny Powers]

My group ( me ) says webber ends up in jail IMO waaaay before they can afford to seek out a group

[Ihubreaper]

yes, they are getting paid very well.

[stockman4]

Is Rox not in jail yet? Where is the justice?

[Alilstockman]

What's the new group get paid? I know what the old group got....

[David i INVEST]

well all her pictures are not pushing here nor is the site on record. Figures she never reports the real thing anyway.

[Ihubreaper]

Website is up.....sorry. You must be looking at the old site.

new and improved....may want to adjust the search engine. LMAO

sometimes it good to be me.

[David i INVEST]

Website is still down LOL. amazing what happens when you cant sale any stock. and have never had any other source of revenue..

[David i INVEST]

Emax is not doing anything. At least they stoped providing fake reports.

[RZN]

What is going on here?

[RZN]

Why do you think this?

[RZN]

Why do you say that?