Replies to post #28510 on CirTran Corporation (CIRX)

[MFlores]

Since 2007 CIRC has proven that it lacks that management ability to compete profitability. After raising millions of dollars CIRC Management squandered the funds and did not develop basic distribution channels and relationships, even with such a recognized trademark. CIRC obviously has never lived up to expectations or promises. No wonder Playboy wants to terminate the arrangement.

CIRC has not been successful with the trademark. It for certain will not be able to compete without it. Playboy can find another formula – energy drinks pretty much all taste the same.
Worldwide distribution means nothing if the distribution does not sell and has little repeat sales.

2013 2012 2011
United States of America ? $341,685 $772,816
South America ? 908,334 1,042,539
India ? 774,772 -
Middle East ? 513,429
Africa ? 494,418
Eastern Europe ? 399,204 329,600
China ? 291,667 -
Western Europe ? 243,049 747,223
Canada ? 96,843 172,260
Other ? 197,016 -
$3,469,000 $3,918,732 $2,291,622

[NASCOW]

chasing rainbows you use words like "big time" vs th reality of PEANUTS; opportunity vs long shot

PB can go anywhere; plenty of BETTER beverage mfgs, with favorable formulations,larger production facilities, better suited for future growth, that would love to work with PB, guaranteed ; even though th enigma of being Novelty still exists [as evidenced by th revenue PB has lost over th years]... Distribution? Piece of cake winning over current distributors or new distributors ; anything would be a vast improvement over a few million in sales spread over 40 countries? LMAO

IMO PB made a mistake going with a small market private labeler with massive debt …but th thing about business is, you can always put th past behind you, learn from your mistakes, and move on

Shareholders will end up w / PEANUTS unless they take profits, whenever th opportunity rises

IMO