427: Re: Since you can't remember NV having a graduate student at Cambridge work on the tech, as well as David Greaves, then that's your fault not mine.
LOL. More word twisting...
Greaves was named to the advisory board. The student at Cambridge presented a poster about guard loss interval - as minor component of noise reduction. There has been no public statement that I know of (and I have read them all) that supports your claim that "David Greaves and Cambridge developed the most important part of Embarq, the last 20%..."
For those of you who are new here (and there seems to be a lot of you), Cobra and I seem to always play this little game. I write a fact-filled, well-reasoned and critical post about how this company has, in my opinion, perpetuated this scam, and he picks out one tiny detail and attempts to argue endlessly about it. In this case, he obviously fabricated some foolishness about Greaves and Cambridge being responsible for 95% of the performance claims of Embarq, when there is absolutely no evidence to support his claim. In fact, much of the public information contradicts it.
I can only assume that his agenda is to detract from the real matters at hand, like my comprehensive post about the dismal history of this company. I also find it interesting that he seems to only post after I do. Coinky-dink?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
