I have zero interest in trying to prove anything to you.
OK. I guess that's settled. You can't provide any proof for your assertions. I didn't think so.
To show the way you think, you accused me of making up the work that David Greaves did when there were many announcements made about him.
Yep. Here comes the inimitable 427Cobra word twisting. I kinda miss this. There were announcements about Greaves being named to the advisory board. I never disputed that. But that's not what you said. Here. Let me refresh your memory:
"You totally left out the most important ingredient in the new tech. David Greaves and Cambridge developed the most important part of Embarq, the last 20%..."
That is not anywhere near the same thing as Greaves being appointed to the advisory board. You made a clear and unambiguous statement as though it were fact. I asked you to prove that. You now tell me you can't.