Archeogeek, thanks for the link on derivative liabilities. Not sure why management would impose a contract(s) for such a large amount based on the corresponding enterprise values, and for what risks would cause them to take such a position. Most likely some form of cash flow hedge based on a number of 2013 acquisitions. Since its accounted for under current assets, my inclination is that within a year the contract(s) would either i) expire worthless less the risk premiums paid based on contract arrangements or ii) exercised to compensate for losses from cash flow variances from 2013 aquisitions and joint ventures.
Bottom line is that, IMO, management is confident enough in their near-term liquidity needs; thus quick ratios will be skewed in the short-term with future (2015 and beyond) statements of financial positions displaying more appropriate figures.
Digging deeper in the financials...
LONG PHOT!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
