InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dcspka

03/30/14 1:36 AM

#20348 RE: guardiangel #20347

Apparently RXPC is a willing participant in the Takeover.

"but is risky because the target company could discover the takeover and take steps to prevent it." It doesn't appear that RXPC has done anything to prevent it, but rather has fully cooperated.

Just the fact there has been a total news blackout is proof of that.
icon url

lakeshore555

03/30/14 9:35 AM

#20352 RE: guardiangel #20347

This takeover/rumor has been going on since March 2011. Every time the company's condition worsens -- delisting, lender lawsuits, loan defaults, cessation of SEC filings, company equity turning out to be non-existent, officers resigning, company losing its building -- the rumor morphs to become less logical and more obtuse.

Only time can expose this rumor to be a fraudulent claim. No point in tossing all this conjecture around.

If you believe that some entity is taking over Radient -- if you believe that this entity already owns over half of this company but for some reason has not returned the company to operational status -- if you believe that this entity owns 85% of the stock and all the volume since Feb 24 was the remaining 15% being tossed back and forth between flippers -- then by all means, buy all the RXPC you can.

Fascinating.
icon url

lakeshore555

04/17/14 9:07 AM

#20827 RE: guardiangel #20347

vester_guy, you said here, on March 30:

"The lenders and Creeping takeover groups control 85 to 90 percent of the 5 Billion authorized shares."

Do you still believe this? If not, what changed in the past three weeks?

And if you do believe this, how do you explain the billion shares that traded on the MJ rumor? That's 20% of the 5 billion and it traded under 0.0005 on nothing more than a Twitter rumor. That tells me there were a lot of RXPC shareholders who wanted to sell into that MJ rumor.... I don't see why the lenders or your takeover groups would sell so cheap.

And it looks like you are saying today that 50% is held by the takeover groups -- that means 35% to 40% is held by lenders? Yet they are not filing current Schedule 13's? You know they can't just file one in 2011 or 2012 and be done -- they have to file Schedule 13's quarterly if they want to stay current..... So it seems that you are saying the Lenders own 35% to 40% but not one of them owns 5%, so there are more than 7-8 lenders holding RXPC shares?