" Paying people to like and comment on the videos"? PROOF? Where? How? When? By whom?
Who cares about a freaking video, when there is an actual case filed on the Broward 17 circuit site, that's been given no comment by the company and didn't appear in the 10-K under "litigation" when it clearly names a company officer and several companies that I'm certain I've seen in previous BHRT PR and other documents?
That's what intrigues me, IMO. It's there, on a real govt site and yet not a peep or comment regarding it? Why? As if it's secret? Again, in PUBLIC traded companies, from all I'm used to, it's all about disclosure. Just say it's there, say it's pending, say who they are or are not going to retain as legal counsel, say if the company is paying for the defense or if it involves them or is strictly personal against the CSO, etc. Whatever- I don't care about videos or tweets or whatever and I don't think most others do either.
I don't freaking care about some video scan of a document? I care that there's a case I.D. assigned and all the other info on the Broward County site- which I know isn't a fake. It's a secure, govt run web site. It's natural for people following the company to now be curious what the heck it's about- since it may involve intellectual property and proprietary methods, specifically related to techniques/methods they used in something like Angel.
What the heck- people are not going to want to know? Of course they want a statement about it. That's my opinion. When Samsung and Apple got into a tangle- it's ALL public and disclosed. When some bank company officer is named in some suit at like JP or Citi or whatever- it's plastered all over the news. People on here act like this is some secret and is a crime to talk about- when the Broward site is the source of info? The court system is the people who decide this stuff is public knowledge and is to be disclosed- you can look up any case you want, in any court across this nation- it's the way our courts operate. Big deal- no "secrets" here or anything. Why are people here trying to put out veiled threats and innuendo that people knowing this case exists are somehow "in trouble" or something for even speaking about it? It's nonsense IMO- it's public information.
Just had a bunch of politicians raided by the FBI the past few days- all across the country- and EVERYTHING about the accusations, charges, courts, etc is already plastered all over every news outlet in the nation- and they've only been "accused" and had cases "filed" - probably don't even have a judge or counsel named/assigned yet. I knew a person at work who had something bad happen to a family member, in a different state- I and many others went to the court web site on that case and looked up everything about it and our local reporters have covered it and re-printed everything on that court's website about the "pending" case- hasn't even gone to court yet. It's normal for our PUBLIC and OPEN court's in this nation. So what?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
