Replies to post #18959 on Capstone Green Energy Corp (fka CGRNQ)

[chklingon]

Once again... a hit job by the talking heads. It is just to obvious that they are paid for these kinds of hits by large groups wanting to short it. Sheese... the rigged game we play in.

[Wild-bill]

His own words negate one of his arguments.

"Capstone finds most of its growth by taking away market share from the diesel and natural gas generator industry."

He says we're too expensive, but fails to mention TCO. Obviously some other players consider TCO or we wouldn't be gaining market share.

Reliability, no oil changes, ~5 nines availability, once/year service (filters), ...

Typical shorter methodology - accentuate the (supposed!) negatives.

MHO,
Bill

[CaptWhizbang]

Definitely a shorter! LOL! I don't think he likes CPST...

I really don't feel he will have much of an affect as his opinion is greatly outnumbered by the positive articles that see it otherwise.

Even more so, his message is so strongly negative with a hard edge to it;, and in addition, he proudly acknowledges being a shorter.

So uneven an article that it is obvious he is has a personal agenda. The agenda of the shorter.

That's why I think the article will turn most readers away. Most people have already made up their minds. I would guess the majority investors know better, or don't really care because they are trading it anyway.

Shorters are part of the game every day. And so are buyers.

Buyers won today and the writer lost. What about those apples..... ?? lol....