Replies to post #22433 on Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[gotmilk]

Mike, When you state "you will find the truth if you dig deep enough" I understand this as you knowing certain facts but decline to engage those details on how Bourque Industries was created and executed by those in charge, and those with influence, that lead to what we have today as a failed company.

I respect your decision, as that is a right of yours.

For others reading this post of mine, and hold BORKs that today has rendered your investment to worthlessness, I welcome your help to untangle the string of events by those people that made possible for this company having great potential to iterate itself into moral decay.

Absent of Mike's (bigdog1) help we need to do a "Where are they all now." and "What did they actually do." and "What really did happen."

First the Kryron Process that John Bourque obtained patents on in a manner of ownership.

If Sigmund was contracted by Twiford to help in the extraction of gold from water at Global Platinum & Gold, then perhaps Twiford tapped into Sigmund's research in alloys and without permission and Sigmund's knowledge enlisted John Bourque as the person to carry this information as their own property. But then perhaps it was Nielsen that initiated the thief. Bottom line, for sure all John Bourque did in regards to the Kryron patents was to sign on the dotted line, as instructed by the patent attorney named D'Allessandro, and here it was either Twiford or Nielsen or both together to bring in this patent attorney known to do what was required.

It clear that Twiford, Nielsen, Sigmund and possibly Sora all came about earlier than Mike's (bigdog1) involvement in that Seattle expo.

Something existed, most likely unrelated to Kryron alloy, whereupon Southworth and Metz were included in this saga to reward or settle a debt with these two with one or more involved directly or indirectly thru one of those mentioned.

Taking a simple view: Lets assumed Nielsen hit the road and entrusted the joint to Davis and Scholl, then John Bourque brought in Saffer as a neighborhood chum and the two of them cooked up most of the usual shennanigans along with CJ and Berry.

Thanks,
Doug

[gotmilk]

re: "... if I could shed some light on those matters [that caused Bourque Industries to fail] and people [that were directly involved to cause Bourque Industries to fail] I would [but as I have often stated, ask questions and hang on to it like a pit bull and you will find the truth, as I have, if you dig deep enough."

Mike, Although your presence on this site shows your remorse, I feel you are a strong enough individual to step up to the plate and do what is right for the hurting BORK holders, as these are all decent people. Having the courage and having the strength to do that shows you are a good man. Many people and families were burned on this deal and its something I know is burning inside of you. CJ Condon is not a good person as you know, and the history of others from the evolution are not either. We here at IHUB are a family of victims---your help is needed Mike. You have the power to speak and many want to hear it. Do you have the strength to follow that.

Thanks,
Doug

[gotmilk]

Mike, You have led the hurting BORK holders to believe that you are the one to insert the missing puzzle pieces since you have stated that your involvement with the activity that lead to the creation of Bourque Industries allotted you a place to observe what you recently posted here in a public post: "There are some whom have walked away with a lot of money if you dig and go way back even further than JBIT.....and it aint John or CJ.....their inexperience in running things is what screwed us and yes some greed......so dig, do research, get behind this one question WHY is not the best armor on the market not selling.....look at the players past and present and you will find the answer......Thanks, Mike"

Now Mike, I don't believe the FBI are ardent readers of this IH Bourque Industries board as those whom are convinced it to be true based on their experience of getting the "cold shoulder" treatment they interpret as feedback from their FBI contact, as I don't twist it as a signal reading in-between the FBI lines as they saying that they have a handle on a Bourque Industries and need no help from outsiders, as I see it as "no comment" where a full disclosure would be "Not interested, no investigation done or to do."

So Mike, I don't expect you to make public any information or activity on which you signed an agreement not to do so, which makes your above words only suitable for disclosure to the FBI by you as a concerned citizen to report what you viewed as criminal activity.

View a crime, not report it to law enforcement, and then tell us in public that you viewed a crime and its the public reading your words that its the public's responsibility to investigate the past events and do whats right.

A big dog with a bark and no teeth is no bigdog.

do:)g