Replies to post #168857 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[MazelMan]

Not really. I figured that the folks here can share their research because I personally don't have the time or patience to dive deep. I appreciate all views not that I agree with all of them but I appreciate and filter them as well. I don't think it's how you put it in your post but let's see what Bavi can do and screw the rest of the bs.

[Protector]

CHEVYGUY, different people you say, write my PPHM posts?

Which CP is going? Read his post, they are written my different people. You guys are so desperate for inside info you would listen to anything.

Some that write perfect English, some that make small mistakes.
That is what you are saying and that is why you conclude that the PPHM posts are made by a 'team' or 'group' of people.

A statement in line with some accusations I heard before as me (that would then be - that team) telling people not to buy PPHMP in order to be able to buy them all myself so that when the common PPHM shares pps gets at 3$ I can short it to death (3$ being the PPHMP conversion price).

Or other accusation claiming I am not in Belgium and use Google to translate my English text to Belgian (LOL), which would then be Dutch, French or German being our official national languages, and translating them back to English and so doing introduce small discrepancies.


Well then let me give it a positive twist. Assuming I am a team you should then be glad my team pointed out the ridiculous nature of this theory about the PPHMP shares, not only from the unsubstantiated claims point of view of my team :) buying them all (which would make US a substantially rich team), but also from the theoretical angle, clearly proving a total lack of understanding of that author when it comes how some things work. Do not confound that imaginary 'team' with the fact I do indeed have a lot of relations with PPHM in portfolios.

At least would the theory have had some elements fitting reality it could have provided a beginning of credibility for the complete statement, but even that wasn't realized.

Now we are at the stage of discussing CP (well either the CP team or a schizophrenic personality or at the best a bi-polar one with moments of excellency spelling and poor spelling :), instead of PPHM - the reason we are all here -, in posts not addressed to me in the hopes I would miss them and not reply.

PS: For those of you asking me to keep posting, I never intended to stop posting, I just said the nature of my posts will change, placing myself outside the 'criticism target' role. If I can't mention the source I no longer share or I write indirect things and you'll have to wait till the events submerge at which point I'll connect to past post to the events. That should end the bashing.

And there is one post form about two years ago that some of you may want to fish up. I EXPLICITLY wrote in it that several posters on THIS VERY PPHM board would come under fire, me included. And look what is happening. Why you guys think I placed that post out there so far back. Could it be because I happen to know how scenario's like the PPHM one deploy because behind the scene it are ALWAYS the same old tricks that are used to turn the retail investor from investor into bag-holder. ALWAYS THE SAME.

Even allowing the pps above 2$ and predicting a drop is part of that and will make many wait to buy under the rumour we'll go back to 1.40$. And who wouldn't want to buy at 1.40$ instead of above 2$?

By now most of you must have figured out that PPHM has the goods, and that it doesn't float some's boat that you believe that because it locks in your shares, that management otherwise then some would want to have us believe did a great job in conserving our IP and pipelines to monetize them. But here again, some do not like you to believe that because if at some point you would be called to vote on something your believe in management could make you vote in the direction of their voting advise, which again may not float some's boat.

So the general message is: Bavi still has to prove itself and hasn't a single approval and Management used the ATM to sponsor their salaries and couldn't care less about the pps and shareholders value as they know Bavi doesn't work.