Replies to post #8500 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

and now for a different perspective

this poster makes a very good point, in general, but I am no EE

Re: Whyte denies Hynix Motion for SJ
by: internal_fire 02/28/06 05:25 pm
Msg: 911980 of 912139

I wonder if anyone cheering this decision actually read it carefully.

It appears that Hynix prevailed on about half of their arguments, and for the other half JW said that the evidence was not sufficient as a matter of law. In other words, half of the arguments are a slam dunk for Hynix, and the other half need to be argued before a jury.

A summary judgement is only granted when essentially all of the pieces fall into place with no need for a jury to decide facts.

This decision is better than a sharp stick in the eye, but it is no indication that a jury would go along.

Disclosure: I used to work in memory development with the now-famous Don Redwine. I am currently neither short nor long in RMBS.


Posted as a reply to: Msg 911685 by winocaroad