Replies to post #62323 on Medinah Minerals (MDMN)

[Beth0515]

I have no clue what you are referring to, the accident is a delay, no buts about it.

Oh really? So, based on your logic, a deal was imminent, and the accident postponed ratification of same? C'mon Chewy, you're better than this! ;-) There was NO deal that was interrupted by the Les accident. Surely you get this.

Your logic is difficult to follow. Mine isn't. Let's try again.

I believe there was NO deal that was impeded by the "accident".

You say the accident was a "delay", which by definition presumes a consequence would have occurred absent the delay.

Perhaps you are just lazy in your choice of language?

You later say:

. This is just one more to add to the endless excuses, which I believe they are running out of. What I was saying is that the notion that the accident was a fabrication is not mine alone, and it is coming from someone highly respected.

NOW we are getting somewhere. If you are saying the accident provided an excuse to obfuscate the lack of any deal, I think we're getting somewhere.

I am certain I can immediately guess who contacted you, and I trust and believe that person as well and have had numerous conversations with him and others outside the scope of iHub.

As you see, we have very different opinions of what is going on, let's leave it at that.

We do? I dunno. If you say so. I'm just pointing out the inconsistency of your recent
points, certainly NOT bullying. I've got $10,000 sitting in a money market account earning essentially zero yield that is YOURS if you can find a single instance where I've vouched for the integrity of a person like Leslie Price, or any of these characters for that matter. Like I said before, you can do better, and you can do so with humor and flair.

If you still disagree, than please submit to this simple exercise- please clearly delineate and specify our "very different opinions".