Replies to post #4527 on SideChannel Inc (SDCH)

[Stock_Barber]

Those 4 points are not false...

1) Is true. I was told that, and how would MDLG know if a poster had called and threatened someone?
2) Is true. I was told that, and again, how would MDLG know the content of the phone call?
3) Is true that the guy believes that to be true.
4) Is true. He no longer posts here.

I'm assuming that what he is saying is that he was not the source of the poster's personal information... and that is fine, I'll accept that.

I asked for clarification and was told that the individual who called and threatened the other guy specifically said that he was given the personal information by MDLG.

So... since MDLG says that he did not provide the individual the info, it seems that his beef should be with the individual that called someone and threatened them and said that they got the personal info from him, no?

The question remains... where did the threat-wielding poster get the other poster's personal information?

[TronCarter]

Wow! So illegal. Exhibit 1 below:

De la garza does not respect SEC regulations.

#idliketospeaktothesec

Message in reply to ‘clok-em-dead’:

I am very happy to report that I received a phone call today from our CEO. Our conversation covered several subjects regarding our company, Most importantly was his response to the allegations in the post below. I made mention here on this thread that I would copy and paste the message below and email it to Delagarza and see if I could get an answer about the claims imposed in it.

I am happy to inform everyone that Michael has assured me that the claims listed below are 100% FALSE and that he does watch this message board from time to time as any interested CEO would. He was happy that I took the time to email him and ask him point blank if the allegations were true. Again I want to assure everyone that they are 100% FALSE.

Re: buynsct Post# 4501
I have been quite clear:

1) A former poster on this board informed me that he was phoned at work by someone identifying themselves as a member of this board.
2) He said that he was threatened with negative consequences if he did not stop posting here.
3) The threatened individual believes that the only way for that poster to have been able to ID him is with the company's help... since they were the only ones that knew his true identity.
4) He no longer posts here.

Draw your own conclusions...