InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mayu

05/10/03 9:12 PM

#11481 RE: wheels #11479

Just a thought, about Corine. You Guys automatically start with under garments, you know a large robe would be the same as a pair of panties for $1.00......she played you guys like a fiddle.......lol
icon url

GrooveMaster

05/10/03 10:38 PM

#11482 RE: wheels #11479

I have had two of my posts deleted. Needless to say it bothered me. I have a different set of values than Excel and see things differently apparently. I would imagine that is the case for most of us. I am glad however that the spew is not here like it is over at the bull. So I'll say that Excel is doing the best that he can. It is not an easy job and runs the risk of pissing people off. So thanks Excel. I'll agree to disagree on some things and thank you for doing your best.

Wheels the pool sounds like good fun. Count me in. You may have to hurry and organize it as it seems to me a movie deal could happen anytime.
icon url

WTMHouston

05/11/03 5:25 PM

#11497 RE: wheels #11479

What's the difference between unlimited guessing about how many articles of clothing Corinne will be wearing at her dinner party and guessing share price?

One has substance and one lacks it. Everyone can decide for themselves which is which. Or, it can be discussed: the novelty of such a concept notwithstanding.

What's good for the fox should be good for the gander, Austin and the rest of us who like to guess share price.

I think guessing about gander-ing was the whole point. But, you really should avoid criti-sizing Corinne and others for the discussion about less substance resulting from more substance. Isn't "less is more" the stock price battle cry from NVEI for the past few years? In any event, that speculation was about as substantive as NVEI speculation has ever been.

I'm proud of excel for not deleting those posts (although I privately bet that he would <g>). They were all good humored -- I would say tongue in cheek, but that might start another discussion.

The boyz buzzed without imposed limitations from the posting police.

Without limitation? Surely, you jest -- remove the limitations and see it really go down -- hill that is.

Give me a great big break!

Be careful what you ask for.

Austin is more on subject than the party Corinne proposes to throw.

Maybe if he would get on her subject.....uh, never mind.

Actually, if that conversation continues unchecked I may have to engage my spam filter.

Would that be a full body spam filter? I'm told that most of those are made of latex. True?