InvestorsHub Logo

eatbytes

03/19/14 1:09 PM

#3235 RE: jim30jen #3196

I got to thinking a bit about jim300jen's posting number 3196 where he asks "Why not a big Pharma?" This question is one worth discussing, I believe. My guess is, for the long term, a small company like MHTX, that wishes to become a big time player, would be better off producing state-of-the-art nanoparticles on its own rather than being involved with a "big Pharma." Of course, this is my guess without any proof to back me up. It'll probably take longer than dealing with a "big Pharma," to see a return in our investment, but the prospect of becoming a major player in the medical world is worth us investors considering.