InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Irish62

03/14/14 5:30 PM

#15649 RE: whosemoney #15648

It's also a possibility that OneScreen was losing most of their business because of bots and other questionable business practices. The employees could stay with a badly injured company or move to ADTM where enough positives were happening that allowed ADTM to overcome the baggage OneScreen was carrying and enter into a licensing agreement with OneScreen. This could also explain why OneScreen gave up 80% of revenue to ADTM.

Beside dotting the i's and crossing the t's, maybe Shareef wants a few months to see if OneScreen still has a pulse. OneScreen still holds a lot of value but once negativity enters the house the end could come quickly. Entering into this agreement with ADTM may have been OneScreen's only play as this is a fast moving industry that is going to leave a lot of carcasses.

OneScreen wouldn't be "giving away" their technology and employees if things in house were still like 2012. Just my opinion.
icon url

newelong

03/14/14 6:22 PM

#15651 RE: whosemoney #15648

whosemoney ... Yes, but if ...

it's a merger then all of OneScreen's employees would automatically then become Adaptive employees. On the other hand, if OneScreen is acquired, it's possible it may maintain its own identity and be run as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Anyway, like you say, one or the other will happen when the time is right.

Have a good weekend.

ADTM