The point is that "some person" automatically implied (supposed) that based on what intel management has been accused of doing, that other intel employees are a bunch of greedy people, who would rather keep their own options then to demonstrate some personal integrity and send a message to management. .
Gee......and I thought Intel's claim to fame was the "monkey see...monkey do" approach. Can you vote your shares anominously or does Intel know how their employees are voting? You know....I have never heard an Intel employee ever take Intel to task about any thing that could even remotely effect current and/or future prospects. However, once Intel turns to a new direction (ex. away from Rambus) they then can criticize like by admitting it to have been a billion+ $ blunder. I think it must be one of their conditions of employment. Oh well.... so much for personal integrity.
Andy Grave
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
