InvestorsHub Logo

lentinman

02/24/06 7:08 PM

#36485 RE: jtomm #36480

Jtomm: RGMI:

Fair question! And, obviously, I have no way of knowing. I suppose calling the company might give an answer.

Having agreed with the possibility that you could be right, take another look at the revenues for the past 4 quarters.

Total Revenue last 4 quarters:
PERIOD ENDING 30-Sep-05 30-Jun-05 31-Mar-05 31-Dec-04  
Total Revenue 5,295 2,085 2,935 3,337
The relatively big jump in revenues in the quarter ending September would imply some early work on the hurricane damage. It wouldn't surprise me if they are going to show a huge increase for Q4 and this PR simply paves the way.

If they got an additional 3M in work (that was actually BOOKED in the later part of Q3) from Q2 to Q3 (which appears feasible), then it is not even remotely unlikely that they could have gotten a legitimate 30M in "net revenues" subsequent to that.

But, it is a legitimate question and many a fast one has been pulled using that kind of terminology.

Len

littlejohn

02/26/06 2:36 AM

#36533 RE: jtomm #36480

jtomm, you thoughts on SFNL recently were quite negative...Is there anything you could add to those which may explain your line of reasoning?...I didn't want to address your posts during the trading week and so soon after a pr which cost the company time and money...The majority of small businesses such as we all discuss are treading on a fine line of success or failure on a daily basis...Any further insights of substance are appreciated...LJ