HPGS struggled with multiple problems... My experience with the previous executives was far more positive than yours and it's also possible that I have a more fond recollection of share price movement because of a well timed buy at $0.05 that was sold in the upper $0.20's.
I only invested in HPGS three times after that:
A $0.13 to $0.20 run
A $0.02 to $0.08 run
And my current position which is substantially positive carry.
While I saw the shares under pressure and did NOT always condone management, if I emailed, called, or texted anyone of them, they always answered.
The current executive arm of HPGS has offered ZERO shareholder "cuddle time".
I'm not surprised...I truly am not. I learned of the Presley's quite a while ago and their reputation precedes them while simultaneously appearing accurate.
What's their reputation? They'll cuddle n pander to the capital investor right up until they cash the check. They love you, and me, and Momma, and anyone else willing to invest some cash in their common shares so they can, in turn, write their pay checks, and pay the bills using shareholder equity as collateral.
You cite the industry on a whole and include HPGS in your citation but you forget that HPGS uncoupled from Nat gas prices back in 2009.
There is upside potential with the stock but without clear steerage from MAMA AND PAPA Presley no single shareholder will be doing anything more than buying a lottery ticket that just looks like shares.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
