Replies to post #84060 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[crashco]

Maybe you've realized small gains because you think small thoughts. The bold Drs. have demonstrated grand vision and will recognize grand results. Grand. I like the sound of that. A grand per share. Yeah, that sounds about right.

[Doctor_Hari_Seldon]

I tend to disagree. I think many on the board would accept 4 Billion at this stage, but honestly feel it is worth more if and when the science is brought to its full potential with all the applications it can address.

[loanranger]

"The Company has no knowledge of being an acquisition target, and has not had any discussions whatsoever of such nature with any parties."

I wonder whose brilliant idea it was to throw that out there. The circumstances don't require it, there's nothing to be gained from it and it pulls the plug on any who might have relied on the existing possibility as a component of support for the share price. All they really had to do was deny the statements in the article, assuming that they were inaccurate.


The PR is clever, though. It greatly expands the universe of people who now know that someone has announced in print their belief that NNVC is not only a legitimate company but is viewed by a potential buyer as being worth $4.5Billion....once in the headline and three times in the 5 paragraph PR.
Denying it is just the excuse for the PR, IMO.

[daBoze]

Then I gather you think Facebook was insane to pay $19,000,000,000 for WhatsApp? All these crazy people throwing their money around like that. What's one to think? Wow!!!

[davidc2]

Look at annual Tamiflu sales that peaked at $3 billion in 2011 and $3 billion look's like giving it away.