InvestorsHub Logo

Petro_Drlg_Engineer

03/06/14 9:49 AM

#8675 RE: ExponentiallyPlaned #8674

EP posted: "Just trying to determine if this "group" is set up to do anything."

From the PR:
"IVD Tech Private Ltd. Executive Directors James Sim and Charlton Kwan, who traveled from Singapore to NanoLogix headquarters in Ohio for the signing"

"IVD Tech is extremely blessed and excited to be NanoLogix's Asia partner. Engagement has already started with potential channel partners and end users in Singapore, Japan, China and other countries."

"NanoLogix CEO, Bret Barnhizer, stated: “It is gratifying that this agreement, which was essentially in development for a year, has been executed. We are very glad to have such an accomplished business group representing our company in an area with huge business potential. We look forward to a long and mutually beneficial relationship with IVD Tech”."

___________________

From one paradigm, it's all smoke and mirrors - typical pinkie Pump and Dump as seems to be the case of some that post on here that own no shares.

Alternate paradigm, Nanologix is working to build a real profitable business and improve healthcare worldwide.

What do we KNOW, or should know and accept?
Nanologix worked with Battelle Memorial on the design and BUILT a clean room - manufacturing facility as it's critical to have one when doing a PR Pump & Dump strategy. Several have visited and confirmed it's existence, except those that still post it's a fraud - a pump&dump - a sham company! Why is it those that visit seem to have a different opinion?

Nanologix has worked with Battelle Memorial as they have independently tested and vetted the products, authoring two published papers on the products. Proof of products? Patents say anything?

Nanologix has even gotten the US EPA to sign and then extend a CRADA. Of course any pump&dump can do this and get it extended. Right?

Also one has to explain the work and posters by Texas Medical Center - UTHSC? Could Nanologix fool all of them and shareholders?

Ok, granted the first international marketing agreement with a Middle East company did not work out. But does anyone know if that was due to the fault of the partner or Nanologix? Seems Nanologix has the goods per above, so my GUESS is that the partner failed to live up to their side of the marketing agreement. Hence new partner and move on as they have done with new GCC agreement.

Since the announcement stated that this has been "essentially in development for a year", and the partner traveled to Ohio to sign the agreement, that we have to give it time to determine if it works or not. It might, but it's not guaranteed. Seems those that want to find fault can nick-pick anything. Just like they did with the Saudi deal and questioning the expertise of the Swiss-based expert that made a statement regarding $900k in revenue in the first year of the agreement.

Yes, games are played and criminals do break the laws regarding pink sheet listed companies. But per the statement by this CEO the last time someone executed a pump&dump on Nanologix shares, it does not mean that company management or all posters on message boards are involved. Use your own brain and make your own independent decisions. If you think it's real, then consider investing; if you think it's not real, decide when to sell all your shares or sell now and move on. It's a big world for investing choices.

Only in my personal opinion, but based on facts;
PDE