Replies to post #183171 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[TII]

bmp152, it could be why, lately, we haven't heard much from congress with respect to FnF.

I think it was Epstein who mentioned that Fairholme et al would be wise to hire somebody to simply track every statement made by government appointed and elected officials to demonstrate these unlawful contradictions. It seems as though many anti-FnF advocates are in rhetorical quicksand...the more they open their mouth, the deeper the pit becomes.

[obiterdictum]

If such statements about recapitalizing the housing trust funds were made to simply appease democrats, did they not consider the ramifications of these statements as they relate to FnF oversight? Surely so, in light of pending litigation?

Who knows if it was considered? It may have been. It may not have been.

I think it was Epstein who mentioned that Fairholme et al would be wise to hire somebody to simply track every statement made by government appointed and elected officials to demonstrate these unlawful contradictions. It seems as though many anti-FnF advocates are in rhetorical quicksand...the more they open their mouth, the deeper the pit becomes.

Indeed. The Ship of State is sunk on these issues and it is a matter of time before it is fully realized.

See: