InvestorsHub Logo

jdolby32

02/28/14 6:05 PM

#2162 RE: returns #2142

returns - I am pretty sure whoever is advising them from a legal standpoint in IP would not be filing something just to file. This is an expensive process and it takes sometimes years to get a patent as I have been down this road before. Not sure what their patent covers but if it is patentable . . . great.
All the more protection from copycats - trick is to be viewed as the gold standard. I am happy they have partnered with PHOT as their CEO is a mover and shaker, i.e., that huge MMJ buildout in Canada with CEN-bio (fitx). They are co-marketing and developing new products and it never hurts to have someone else out selling your products. Not sure about this container park, but if it involves FSPM then it would be a mother of an order and justify the doubling of capacity in Denver. Trick for Dittman is to be able to balance the demand and production of big orders. These kinds of orders could become more common with big money and customers with vision. Almost every week now you see a state or city council voting on an MJ issue. Blocks are slowly being removed and no state is going to want to be left behind with this 'tax revenue' machine. I worked in the dot-com era for a company that built e-commerce sites for major corporations. Corporate executives had no idea what the internet was all about but it didn't matter because everyone was involved and you had to be there. After spending millions on a site, executives and BOD's wanted their ROI - and that is where it all fell apart as they couldn't keep justifying the cash drain. Kaboom. The company I worked for would not take a project unless it was a million dollars or more - and the phone rang off the hook. MMJ is different as people know what it is and how to make money off of it. Companies actually have business plans and investors behind them. We have only scratched the surface and I believe FSPM is a lead dog in this green-rush. jm2¢