InvestorsHub Logo

asmarterwookie

02/28/14 10:02 AM

#163440 RE: Frustrated #163439

Yes just cherry pick it to whatever you like



Current and forward looking synopsis is what I appreciate in poster.

I do not appreciate those who only present the past....is that a paradox?

WOOK to TUSTIN....messages read loud and clear.....

We still need "official" clearance clarence...over....


wook

EYEBUYSTOX

02/28/14 10:16 AM

#163444 RE: Frustrated #163439

Hey Frustrated,

With everything else slated the next week you have to admit a pre-market earnings PR for the first time since Fargo is more bullish than bearish, no? I'm skeptical as well but with everything else surrounding it the skepticism is sprinkled with hints optimism.

Protector

02/28/14 10:19 AM

#163447 RE: Frustrated #163439

It is no cherry picking.

The people that make the decisions today are those that made them in Sept 2011, not in your 2001.

Using data from 12 years ago under non-comparable circumstances to invalidate data from the the last 3 years in representative circumstances that is what I would call cherry picking.

Not just sure if therefore your "LOL" isn't misplaced.

I can't help it that PPHM didn't do any Quarterly PR announcement on Fridays Pre-Market with a CC following around 11AM for the past 12 years (except that ONE 9th Sept 2011 that I referred to where they preceded it with the good news from the 2nd ln NSCLC completely enrolled PR).

But if you find your 12 year old information more relevant then my recent data and you which to call it cherry picking go ahead. I remember one that ones said PPHM did cherry picked the clinical trial results, the same one that said Bavituximab was a placebo. He was wrong too!