InvestorsHub Logo

Jacked

02/26/14 6:09 PM

#179901 RE: bmp152 #179900

that's right!!!

betahighlander

02/26/14 6:12 PM

#179903 RE: bmp152 #179900

Agree-
Berkowitz is playing smart ball here. Not pushing the ruling in anyone's face and saying hey, we are reasonable lets work this out.

Donotunderstand

02/26/14 6:59 PM

#179931 RE: bmp152 #179900

grrrrreat news

(and I did know my money was on the table and growing while the potential for a key negative - nope - was out there today)

love it

I totally agree on how to read what Berkowitz said - "lets talk"

Did anyone keep the argument Fairholme lawyers used to the GOV's key argument that no harm has yet been done - so the time and case is not ripe

I think Fairholme said the third amendment made the case ripe as it effectively shut down F and F barring a reversal in that policy

but anyone have that answer - I think it was posted this AM and was well well well written and I bet influenced the judge on the need to do discovery to see if the GOV can argue there is no case yet

feralcomprehension

02/26/14 7:49 PM

#179959 RE: bmp152 #179900

Yeah, kind of like "Don't make us embarrass you in front of everyone..."

crawford2012

02/26/14 10:40 PM

#180051 RE: bmp152 #179900

Bmp152...your interpretation is right on...this is exactly what is going to happen...

Not because they are the govt it means they automatically win...it's the opposite...it is because they are the govt they must do the right thing and return the companies to their share holders as it was originally planned...

The 2012 change to the originally agreed on is nothing more that an attempt to steal money in day light.

All that is happening here...some rich people wanted to get richer...

P.s love the way you think.
Cheers.