Wrong, Edeniq offers no such indemnification and you can't prove otherwise. As I have proved before, ANDE, a GERS licensee, purchased an infringing ethanol plant that was being sued for using Edeniq's equipment without a license. ANDE licensed the infringing plant with GERS effectively ending the lawsuit. Edeniq refused to back the infringing plant in court and left them hanging without paying a single dime.
So you're wrong Dutch, the writing is on the wall. Equipment providers are not paying PEIX anything. In fact, I have confirmed that a certain equipment supplier requires ethanol produces to sign an agreement stating they are not liable for any damages if that plant decides to infringe GERS technology.
In fact, the largest centrifuge company in the world now refuses to sell this equipment unless the ethanol producer is licensed with GERS. This company, GEA, is a defendant in the current lawsuit.
Equipment suppliers refuse to indemnify for good reason, GERS patents are valid. The damages PEIX owes to GERS is in the millions.
If you followed the courts rulings and the USPTO's findings, like I do, you would have a very good idea which way the judge is leaning.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
