When a company, PPHM in this case, is at its strongest EVER and things like this:
or this:
or questions about the China subsidiary or a product in 2012 must be pulled out of the sleeves to bring, even negligible, opposition against the sea of positive things that are happening, or if the PPS must be called in as a last resort of exemplary thinking to demonstrate everything must be bad then we are good.
Because in ALL OTHER CASES a decent, laid out argument could be constructed against the topics at hand TODAY without the need to pull cows out of the river of 5 or 10+ years ago.
Yes, in that era some mistakes were made WITHOUT ANY DOUBT. But who cares if we see that TODAY they no longer make them. They salvage clinical trials, got us 2 P3s and financed the company to be in a strong position owning it's pipelines and IP 100% unencumbered in stead of giving it away for breadcrumbs as do many small cap biotech.