It would be much better to, say, rise
100% from PPS 0.40 than to rise 100%
from PPS 0.30 - if there was no need
for the PPS to be @ 0.30 - unless one is
a day-trader, or looking to get in. All
good.
As an INVESTOR 'who has the stomach' to
be in this since PPS 2012 0.0142, I prefer to
see the shareholders' interest protected
by whatever means the company has to do
so, without compromising its mission.
Further, on the 'sell cars' analogy: If
GM$ ONLY made a promotional statement when
it came out with a new model development,
and nothing - ever - till the next development,
there would be fewer 'product' sold to customers.
Aside from the product sales line, consider
investors to /also/ be customers - who need to
hear and know that there is a product out there,
and that that product is a good one.
I am patient. I am also against unnecessary, IMO,
plunges in the running PPS. Also, there is too
much shrift given to the term 'fluff PR'. There
is nothing wrong with mentioning one's self favorably -
not to the choir - but to those walking by with $$$
in their pockets who don't even know that YOU exist -
no less PHOT
That is MY opinion, and I am entitled to it
~~ PHOT ~~
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
