Great post Tedco! I can understand your point of view, but unfortunately all investors are not successful lawyers that can invest money, lose 90% of it and 13 years later, still be at a 90% loss and say they are happy to be there because,..it's coming.
1.) There is no hype
2.) There s no pump. Show me a pump. I dare you.
3.) Saying there could be a dump, just shows how much you really don't know about trading or investing. ZERO has almost no shares, so who's dumping? Oh! I know! The same imaginary people that are pumping?
I shake me head and laugh when I read words like that. You do not want anyone to know about what STWA is doing, but yet you approve of PR's like LG Partners & ETA.
Strait out, STWA doesn't have the first freeking clue how to take care of shareholders. Maybe you are happy with that, but I don't know too many other shareholders & bag holders that are. My inbox is filled with "Thank you!" & yet your ridicule me. Nice.
You all think one contract and it's blue skies, home free? That just shows how naive you really are. You got that contract last August & where are you now? Oh! Still 50% - 90% LOSER!
We are on the OTC which means ANYONE can do anything they want to ZERO. The MM's can tank this to trip zeros on a whim without volume. Thats just one reason I'm doing everything i can to get us out of the dangerous waters. Something STWA has never been able to do.
Case and point Counselor; Looks at $GCEI on Thursday. $GCEI after two years of waiting finally got the Dow Jones, NYSE partnership agreement news. News like that should have sent GCEI to $2, but Ya know what? IT TANKED!
It tanked because an old business partner shorted it & had enough shares to cause a catastrophic sell-off. Who, BTW, I personally exposed, got it to the company that sent a cease & desist, now GCEI can trade normally. My posts are on that board to prove it.
Get it yet? You are in Alice's Wonderland down here. You think up is up, but up might be down. There are very few people that know how to navigate these waters. I am one of them. Like me or not.
Poke fun all you like, but the reason for the 25% rise in 4 days is 100% on me. I posted a week ago Friday, I was sick of being a loser, STWA fumbled the ball & someone passed it to me so I'm running the touchdown to a minimum of $3.
STWA has built a fabulous product. They have made the company successful, but Ya know what. They are not paying dividends so that means NOTHING! All that matters in the OTC is where people think STWA might be going.
This is a popularity contest. The only way to win, is to be popular. Not putting out PR's, or putting out the type of PR's STWA has, does not make ZERO popular. That's good for a short time to load cheapies, but not a good place to stay.
If you are popular with a lot of volume market makers tend to leave the contestant alone. The only way to be popular when you are a "Real company", with a real product is to LET INVESTORS KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON!
STWA could be the best company in the OTC, but if they are not communicating to the public exactly what's going on, and where they might be in the future, this will go nowhere. STWA will always be around $1.
That might sound like gibberish to you, and you may not agree with me & that's fine. Honestly, I don't care what anyone thinks. STWA should have focused all of their efforts to uplist. Once back on NASDAQ "You're safe!".
In addition, once we clear $2, which isn't hard. $5 will come so fast, like the blink of an eye. Those institutional investment firms loading a million shares, were loading because they know this. Once we tap $5, next stop is $50.
Let me ask; Tedco, Where is the Plan-B? It's fantastic STWA has finally after 14 years reached success, but "What if"?
There are always unforeseen hurdles in every business. The "Chit happens" scenario or as I like to say "As man makes plans, God laughs".
I don't know about you all but during the holidays I would have much rather skimmed a little profit from ZERO for a nice vacation, rather than be on a budget since my portfolio got slammed because management felt it's in our best interest to keep "Quiet".
Personally I think it's bad business to allow your PPS to slide under any circumstances. If you are allowing your shareholders to lose value, you are not doing your job.
Not only does a low PPS put the company in a bad position for when the "Chit happens", but common sense will tell you its best to always be healthy. Thinking you do not need to tend to your shareholders because it's coming down the line all at once, is IMO just plain reckless.
What if? How is STWA preparing us for the worst? Only fools think "That can't happen to me". Wise businessmen always are prepared for "When chit happens".
I'd rather be prepared for a "Chit happens" at $5, than $.50 but apparently so called "Serious sophisticated investors" would rather stay "Bag holders", sipping on koolaid. Sorry, I'm not one of them & do everything I can to ensure we are safely back on NASDAQ ASAP!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
