InvestorsHub Logo

cosmoworld7

05/05/03 12:17 PM

#11377 RE: austin01 #11376

Austin, if you take a look back at the OS numbers (Pengy periodically posts then in the research link) you will see that a mere one year ago the OS was around 44,208,380 - today that number has increased to around 60,000,000 (if I am not mistaken). So you can do the math and determine that the dillution has been pretty significant in a mere one year. I cannot guess how much capital this has raised, but for augments sake lets say those shares were discounted to .30 (.40 avg sp - 20%). This would be a total capital of $4,500,000. This may sound like a lot but its really not, considering tech companys require a lot of money for skilled workers, computer hardware/software, high profile executives salaries and the usual expenses of office rent, travel, supplies, etc. So we can expect this type of dilution to continue if they are not able to obtain financing or at least get some movie revenue. However, I have invested in many other OTC companies in the past and even when they got financing the dilution continued (albeit at a slower rate), so you can never count on it. You would be better off just accepting that dilution is a fact of life for all OTC investing.

porscha

05/05/03 12:20 PM

#11378 RE: austin01 #11376

austin - take the percentage the market has dropped over the past two years and multiply it by the amount of money NVEI has spent on the tech since greaves came on board. multiply that by 4% of the dsl subscribers in asia and divide by the number of shares that NVEI has issued in the past two years and that will be your answer.

in other words, how in the holy heck am i supposed to know?



austin01

05/05/03 4:17 PM

#11393 RE: austin01 #11376

pengy, would you please "give this a shot"?
How do you feel Embarq's revenue potential compares to what was thought the original tech would reap? As far as shareprice potential, how much, in your opinion, has dilution dimished it in the last couple years?