Replies to post #218970 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[SoxFan]

you are full of fecal matter as that is not true but your inability to do research probably has you at a disadvantage as all any wingnut can tell you anything and you would believe it

Hell it even deserves a Pants-on_fire it's the fourth highest you bozo

http://www.politifact.com/rhode-island/statements/2013/jan/06/facebook-posts/facebook-posting-says-gun-rich-swiss-have-lowest-f/

[PegnVA]

So you would be in favor of the US implementing gun laws like Switzerland has - right?
note: read SOXY's Pants On Fire post before answering

[arizona1]

We should follow their example and require every household to have a automatic weapon.

I don't think you've researched the gun laws in Switzerland because it's not what you think it is.

However, SWITZERLAND’S law requires that EVERYONE….

1. Own a Gun

2. Maintain Marksman qualifications….regularly

3. “Carry”…….. a Weapon.

Could that last be true? You sure never hear about this?

Transporting guns

Guns may be transported in public as long as an appropriate justification is present. This means to transport a gun in public, the following requirements apply:

The ammunition must be separated from the gun, no ammunition in a magazine.

The transport has to be direct, i.e.:
For courses or exercises hosted by marksmanship, hunting or military organisations,
To an army warehouse and back,
To and from a holder of a valid arms trade permit,
To and from a specific event, i.e. gun shows.[10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland