I think you got a little Fuzzy Math going on here.
Wrong details
"Interesting.
Maybe this is one possible work out:
1. Out of $97B of assets on balance sheet, there is $15B "equity" if there is a complete liquidation without NOLs or paying Creditors.
2. $70B in NOLs represents $24.5B in tax savings at (35% tax rate) in a 49%-51% Debtor-Shareholder split.
3. So, $15B + $24.5 x (.49) = $27.01B should be $15B + ($24.5 x (.49)) for Debtors or 9.31% of Liabilities Subject to Compromise
4. And, $24.5 x (.51) = $12.5B for Creditors after all is liquidated.
But, here is a question: If the Debtors (Liability holders on LBHI balance sheet) can make more money agreeing to another 20% to 30% write down on their claims subject to compromise, why wouldn't they agree to do so?
What terms will they offer Creditors?"
Is more what your saying ...Like I said Fuzzy math every where.
WAWAWA