Replies to post #60713 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[wooden]

Well , One more thing I must say here! Over the yeas I believed I have read postings from some brilliant minds, and some of which had improved their legal knowledge just through researching bad doings that happened here with CLYW. I still believe these postings can make a good book on what can happen in this market place. And I think it's an insult by the court, to all who contributed their brilliance to this board over the years. Yes!! This stinks!! Maybe TM's money reaches further than we think.

[Eli's Gone]

FWIW...

CALYPSO WIRELESS, INC. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]

A Rule 36 judgment can be entered without an opinion when it is determined by the panel that any one of five conditions exist and a written opinion would not have precedential value. The five conditions are:

The judgment, decision, or order of the trial court appealed from is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous.

The evidence supporting the jury’s verdict is sufficient.

The record supports summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings.

The decision of an administrative agency warrants affirmance under the standard of review in the statute authorizing the petition for review.

A judgment or decision has been entered without an error of law.