News 
Market Data 
Discover
Replies to post #158146 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)
02/11/14 9:28 PM
stringofpearls Tuesday, 02/11/14 07:22:08 PM
Re: 2bornot2b post# 157984
Post # of 158171
that NTEK IR email "source" is FLATULENT..here's-why…..
1st…..
IR source says <50 are iHub customers……HOW does IR know who is iHub or not, is the NSA working with IR to determine who orders?? ridiculous comment that, IF REALLY MADE, was the worst thing the IR Dept could've said to maintain credibility……because it DIDNT need to be said and also, it sounds like an eighth grader comment about a "sore spot" for NTEK
2nd….
considering the "TECH LEAP" claims made about the NP-1, etc,……. the quote of "thousands" that have received their shipments, which were shipped in January, should have resulted in at least 10-50 UNSOLICITED REVIEWS that circulate on the WEB…….. techies are legion in their stealth reviews and "sneak previews" especially the RICH techies who get this stuff through back office "favors" to expressly LEAK the good review for the product……….ANYONE SEEN ONE YET?????????
3rd….
IR says that 2 "big box" stores HAVE the NP-1 and are training staff for "roll out"……..dont you think that those NERD/GEEK TECHIES would be blabbing all the way to Silicon Valley blogs???…...
4th…..
Since the NP-1's have been delivered, then it seems if I was CEO….I'd waltz right into WIRED or PC MAG or Pop Sci magazine offices and dazzle em with the TECH…..getting the world all twisted in a frenzy………….hasnt happened
HIGHLY DOUBTFUL that IR has ANY information that is credible, after reading the "purported" IR email exchanges……………….very WONKY "facts" in that email, which falls into the same category as rumor or just plain garbage info
SORRY to hear, because I want to see a PENNY succeed……..BUT it is more important to call them as I see them
that NTEK IR email "source" is FLATULENT..here's-why…..
1st…..
IR source says <50 are iHub customers……HOW does IR know who is iHub or not, is the NSA working with IR to determine who orders?? ridiculous comment that, IF REALLY MADE, was the worst thing the IR Dept could've said to maintain credibility……because it DIDNT need to be said and also, it sounds like an eighth grader comment about a "sore spot" for NTEK
2nd….
considering the "TECH LEAP" claims made about the NP-1, etc,……. the quote of "thousands" that have received their shipments, which were shipped in January, should have resulted in at least 10-50 UNSOLICITED REVIEWS that circulate on the WEB…….. techies are legion in their stealth reviews and "sneak previews" especially the RICH techies who get this stuff through back office "favors" to expressly LEAK the good review for the product……….ANYONE SEEN ONE YET?????????
3rd….
IR says that 2 "big box" stores HAVE the NP-1 and are training staff for "roll out"……..dont you think that those NERD/GEEK TECHIES would be blabbing all the way to Silicon Valley blogs???…...
4th…..
Since the NP-1's have been delivered, then it seems if I was CEO….I'd waltz right into WIRED or PC MAG or Pop Sci magazine offices and dazzle em with the TECH…..getting the world all twisted in a frenzy………….hasnt happened
HIGHLY DOUBTFUL that IR has ANY information that is credible, after reading the "purported" IR email exchanges……………….very WONKY "facts" in that email, which falls into the same category as rumor or just plain garbage info
SORRY to hear, because I want to see a PENNY succeed……..BUT it is more important to call them as I see them
AI
