Replies to post #7990 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

I'll say this, you're consistent on this "no AT liability" point re Hynix.

What is your reasoning?

Have you seen Kramer's string/record of settlements?

smd
===============
The question is, can they settle on the issues of infringement but continue to litigate against Hynix on AT?

Sure they can; although it is unlikely Hynix would settle without global peace everywhere. With that said, Hynix has little to no exposure in the AT suit, AFAI am concerned, so they may not care.

Da Greek

[bearinvt]

>>Sure they can; although it is unlikely Hynix would settle without global peace everywhere. With that said, Hynix has little to no exposure in the AT suit, AFAI am concerned, so they may not care.<<

Not sure about the latter statement given Tabrizi's stated desire to kill Rambus, but the thrust of my question was answered by your first line.

It seems then that if Hynix loses against Ram on infringement, other than delaying thru appeals (ala RIMM), they may have to settle given the court order. Rambus meanwhile could elect to see them in the AT trial.

thanks for the input, nic.