InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ItsMyTurn

02/11/14 1:11 AM

#78760 RE: insomniac4 #78750

I agree with you Insomnia.. In the last hour I have looked through the internet and found that most amateur growers can achieve 1/2 up to a pound per plant. With proper light cycles and pinching and topping methods come close to 2 pounds albeit not in 35 days.

With scientific methods applied and indoor controls of CO2 and Light and water its not farfetched. I will continue my search to bring legitimacy to Bills claims but it is likely to be a lab study and method that isn't published to the masses.

This is an amazing time and when Bill starts production and we see the FRUITS of the facility the sky is the limit.. I got in at .0051 for 100k shares of a Vitamin supplement company. I saw the shift happen and watched for a bit then bought another 900K at .02 to make 1M shares...this is easily a life changer for me and many here.
icon url

Floppyplants

02/11/14 1:32 AM

#78773 RE: insomniac4 #78750

If little stinky pinky OTC company RXNB has a "patent" for a product or method that reduces crop ripening times in half, they have solved a huge piece of the world hunger issue...

So kindly...

Could you either:

A)Show me the "patent" issue that describes this method or product
B)Show me anything at all regarding this patent, method, snake oil, etc.

I figured Monsanto would beat RXNB to doubling production times for fruits and flowers, but I guess a penny company might have one up on the largest agricultural goaliath of all time.

There are a couple of ways to decrease cannabis maturation times by 7-10 days, at best, and they both involve spraying petroleum based chemical plant growth regulators on that chronic you are about to smoke...

I'm certain this "patentable technology" involves pumping CO2 into the greenhouse which stimulates plant growth AND even increases yields by as much as 30-40%, but in no universe does it increase maturation times.

To say something like that IS possible isn't childish, but certainly naive and absurd.

And sorry to break it to you: Mother Nature isn't the same as man made technology created by humans in a lab.

Growing 3-5 pound plants in a controlled environment is very, very doable. That's not the argument.

My argument IS NOT that FITX is not legit, lying to shareholders, or any of that... I'm not even saying Bill is lying to shareholders. I think he legitimately has no clue about what goes into the growing side of things. Yes he understands the business model, his company, and the industry as a whole. But to throw those numbers around is absolutely laughable.

Inflated numbers and lying to shareholders in this burgeoning market doesn't sit well with those of us in this industry trying to make it legitimate. There are people working hard to increase exposure for the oversight and legislation that this industry so desperately needs, and to see stuff like this is... frustrating, to put it neatly.

For the record, I am long on FITX, even though I have not yet taken a position. I do not mean to sound like a basher of this stock, just an advocate and passionate individual for this future.