Replies to post #23152 on Cyclone Power Technologies, Inc. (fka CYPW)

[terry hallinan]

Hi, MTM.

Your challenge to them is fair: "Any time they wish they can put their wonder on the market." You realize, of course, that the same challenge also applies to CYPW's products.

To be fair, I pretty much stopped reading after I saw "internal combustion" and no indication of any radically different fuel. I have written about an internal combustion biomass engine with reported proof-of-concept demonstrated at Syracuse University but my amateur opinion that it is most unlikely to ever be built because of fouling of the piston chambers despite assurances that has been dealt with.

I complained to Harry Schoell in person that his description of the Schoell waste heat engine as a steam engine is not correct and, surprisingly, he agreed to a point. Even were it an improved Stanley Steamer, it would still hearken back to the venerable steam engine.

At this point, I no longer know what was delivered to the military nor have any idea what, if anything, was done with whatever was delivered. I am quite well aware that the military will take delivery of total turkeys and it appears that's what they got even if it was only engineering drawings.

Is there anything now capable of delivery when and if built?

Dunno.

Like you, I wish I did but I am encouraged that Phoenix Power thinks CYPW is getting there. I am on the other hand very unhappy with the diversion to cold fusion, which I regard as a farce.

Waiting on some good word but less than sure there will ever be any.

Best, Terry