There is a pipeline,patents and a world of information they can tell us about if they just get off there hands which has nothing to do regarding the ligation.To much focus on this matter.
Still say not updating the company website regarding TauC3,ir spokeperson has to be for what I feel is your reason a sale.Why update anything if you are being bought.
As far as these new filings I new exactly what was coming before they hit.Defense is fishing hoping to catch the big bass or just misdirection to get direction which is settlement.
Even if which it is not imo a violation of the C/A agreement from what I've seen yet it caused (NO) damage.In order to be awarded damages you have to prove damages and first you have to have solid evidence.
Nothing I read was slanderious.Nothing gives the details of the negotiations of the agreement,contract dollar amounts and in no way would cause PFE unfair future dealing regarding similar license agreements,contracts with whomever and Oing will dismiss the claim from the proof shown.
Shapiro will amend the complaint to add additional claims.I said before the motion to branch was ordered by Oing if there was solid evidence that second claim would still be going forward.Going to need alot more evidence before new claims are added.
Still say if this was a breach of the C/A agreement which its (NOT) imho.When the defense efiled this they then breached the C/A cause they new it should have been filed secure confidentially protected.
Ex.Shapiro withholding the orginal complaint not filing it with the summons.He new it was or could be protected.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
