InvestorsHub Logo

gandalfq01

02/06/14 10:45 AM

#58187 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

WOW...but WTFDIK

Papa V

02/06/14 10:49 AM

#58188 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

Yawn

Mystik7

02/06/14 10:52 AM

#58192 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

White noise here. Sry

Ablivious

02/06/14 10:58 AM

#58199 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

Good thing you are not in this then -
Thanks for your kindness - jack***

~~ PHOT ~~

beentheredunthat

02/06/14 11:00 AM

#58200 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

Eagle, this is typical for almost all pennies. Thank you for making people see the reality.

picon

02/06/14 11:01 AM

#58201 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...HUH? WHAT? OHHH...IT'S U AGAIN...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Lombardi

02/06/14 11:03 AM

#58204 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

I'm afraid an imminent wave of positives may swallow these assumptions and completely overshadow your well thought article. This sort of intense scrutiny is exactly what PHOT needs. It needs to be put up against the fence and thoroughly searched. It needs to respond to the hardest hitting criticisms and put this to bed. I would be happy to see the CEO answer to these allegations in an interview.

However, after the shakedown is complete and you see something truly legitimate, growing, expanding, upgrading, overtaking, encompassing. Something people stop writing 'short' articles about will emerge.

When you publish your article, I have some tips for you. Since there were already 2 negative articles that proved ineffective, you will be dealing with a much more, 'boy who cried wolf' cynical response to your article. So, remove the condescending tone and reconsider depicting PHOT's team as dastardly. Why shouldn't you try to incite emotions of hate and rage? Well, it certainly helps your credibility to attack something from a neutral standpoint - intelligent people seem to be able to discern... Agendas.

What would I know though? I'm just an investor in this company since .05 cents. I was buying products from this company before I even knew I could have stock in it.

Fasttrack1

02/06/14 11:10 AM

#58207 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

You must be just a good citizen and care about all of us folks... or do you have another agenda?

I'm going with #2 - another agenda!

robinsong

02/06/14 11:27 AM

#58215 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

I am confident that you will have your questions answered by the conclusion of shareholders meeting. If I am wrong than I wrong. You suggest several scenarios that if false will be debunked very soon. So I say to all longs ... Stay long unless given reason to do otherwise. Positive news regarding phot every where. Who you gonna believe eagleeye14 or the Wall Street journal.

wagonwheel47

02/06/14 12:26 PM

#58244 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

All very valid points eagleeye14.....I actually cut and pasted part of your comments and sent them to kurt@integrityir.com PHOT investor relations guy along with a few questions of my own to see if I get a reply.....
I have also contacted ETrade customer support and asked them if they have ever heard of RXNB. The replied back that they have never heard of and do not know anything about them..... It is pretty weird nothing anywhere about them and they make $27mm a year.....

stockjuicer

02/06/14 2:22 PM

#58283 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

Responding to eagleeye14: Post# 58162

The shares numbers you present are correct and will be about 2.5 Billion shares an a fully diluted basis after all the deals are made. Nothing really new, it is all in the filings.

"Now let’s review Growlife’s joint venture with RXNB:
1) RXNB deal: Growlife owns 45% of OGI, while OGI owns 40% of RXNB. Therefore Growlife owns 18% of RXNB. In return for the 18% stake, Growlife will issue RXN* 265m shares at a cost of $0.17 per share. OGI guarantees that the Sellers will receive in the aggregate not less than $18m within nine months from January 24, 2014 or upon the Sellers’ liquidation of the RXN* Payment Shares, whichever is sooner.
2) Why is Growlife issuing $45m of stock ($103m of stock at today’s share price) for an 18% stake in a company that supposedly generates $27m of sales? That would value RXN* at $250m, or about 10x my estimate of the company’s actual worth. Yet another example of Growlife destroying shareholder value in order to grow revenues, and also another example of why Growlife needs to keep their share price propped up as long as possible before its ultimate collapse.
3) Try searching for RXN* on the internet. It’s nowhere to be found - hard to believe for a company that supposedly generates $27m in sales. "


What he says is correct but he doesn't mention what RXN* brings to the table. He wants to create a sell off, that's all. RXN* brings a research lab, 50000 patients per month, a network with 2700 clinicians , and actual sales.

"Now, let’s review their joint venture with CEN Biotech:
1) CEN Biotech deal: Growlife owns 45% of OGI, while OGI Inc owns 25% of CEN (owned by FITX). Therefore Growlife owns 11.25% of CEN. In return for the 11% stake, Growlife will issue CEN 235m shares at a cost of $0.17 per share.
2) Once again, That would value CEN at $356m, or about 100x my estimate of the company’s actual worth. CEN’s 85,000 square foot grow facility may or may not get approval and be constructed. Either way, its value is a small fraction of the valuation Growlife is placing on the company via their share issuance. "


1) "why is Growlife issuing $40m of stock ($92m of stock at today’s share price) for an 11% stake in a company that generates $2m of sales?"
Completely wrong and this shows his motives very clear. Growlife isn't buying a stake in a company that generates 2M in sales, it is buying a stake in a company that is going to produce up to 1.3M pounds of MJ worth BILLIONS in sales.

2) "CEN’s 85,000 square foot grow facility may or may not get approval and be constructed."


They have received a ready to build letter from Health Canada.

"Now, let’s value the company using a sum-of-parts approach, not even including the upcoming share and warrant dilution. It assumes a 20% return on their $40m financing package and still yields a net value of $0.03 per share: "

This is very wrong: the company is expecting a minimum of five times return on investment or 500% , not 20%

"Finally, let’s also look at the fund raising the company has done in the past, before the industry hype. There were 10 equity raises at an average cost of $0.03/sh: "

The past is the past. Growlife has chosen a new business model.

My personal simplified take on this whole deal?

CEN Bio will grow it , RXN* will test it and distribute it.

PHOT's books and structure are way too messy to be able to go for up listing in the near future and this counts for FIT* as well.
But OGI inc will have a healthy structure and will be able to IPO.

You have to be able to see the bigger picture and try to think years ahead.

Papa V

02/06/14 5:13 PM

#58451 RE: eagleeye14 #58162

At 9:00 am Timothy Sykes tweets to his followers to "short phot". Then at 10:20 am this "small cap machine clown" posts this exact blog on ihub. #58413 under the name of "eagleeye 14" To which several long time phot posters refute the validity and basically trash it. Then he post the same crap on SA. It is no coincidence the order, timing, and collusion of these events. Either SA has no regard for what it allows on its site or they are duplicite in this act