"But it is the act of bashing that promotes an image of failure to the investor, and thus surely does play a significant role in the pps performance of the stock, which is directly related to the success of the company to some extent. "
So the act of "bashing"(which is a subjective word based on your opinion) has control over the PPS "to some extent". I say bull. If posts which are deemed negative have influence over the PPS, then the posts which are deemed positive must have an equal and opposite effect upon the PPS.
And this is a misleading statement.:"I am now, however, suggesting that every one of your posts that I have read on this board does not have to be "percieved as negative" by anyone, they are, by definition, negative posts."
have you only read 4 of my posts? Most of my posts are spent defending against personal attacks by posters with misdirected anger. BTW, they are NOT, by definition, negative posts. I think all of my posts are positive. Please donot confuse your opinion with fact. I feel you're educated enough to know the difference, right? If so, then you're being dishonest. Thanks for you careful consideration of my thoughts about your ridiculous statements.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
