Replies to post #12315 on Intellect Neurosciences Inc. (fka ILNS)

[itwillgetbetter]

I've one question.Why does this letter regarding the prior CEO have to be plaster when it has no bearing regarding the company ILNS anymore?

Its clear the company owes him nothing.The issues are moot.

It has no bearing regarding the ligation breach of contract against Pfizer.This appears to be a personal issue to keep this letter up when in fact its all in the SEC filings which investors have easy access to.

I've copied emails regarding Chains dispute that is settled long ago and what his holding position was when he sent the emails to me.

If one thinks I'm lying they can contact Chain and I'm sure the doctor will say exactly what I posted is correct.

I would have liked to see what Chain would have been able to do in the future with this company however the powers to be decided otherwords.

I still have a couple of issues regarding events that occured while he was CEO and we both disagree and will never agree.He feels he is right and I know I'm right so I wish him the best with his future business and developments even if its in the same field as ILNS.

Heck I got issues regarding other events that have occured over the past 9 months one being Jan 17,2014.

Who knows if the ihub board shows the correct pipeline cause Maza sure in the heck want talk or can not talk.

Its strange we got a news relaese regarding the last patent up on the ihub board but not the pr regarding TauC3 this Jan 14.