InvestorsHub Logo

TTommy

01/28/14 6:57 AM

#8054 RE: Justfactsmam #8052

Yes another post on target there 'Just'. I had posted some time ago about Steve V. taking care of business instead of answering all the e-mails and calls from investors as many have stated on this forum. He should be spending more time in moving DSNY forward. I assume he felt compelled to chat, something that could have been handled very easily by an underling or a p/r person instead of wasting precious time. And I am one who sold off some of my DSNY in the $ 1.80's and hold a core position like I have stated until the end of February the time of the AGM and possible share reverse outcome. The company fundamentals are very strong but the angle of attack by corporate is something less than desirable at this juncture. My suggestion would be for DSNY to stop chasing the 'boogeyman' and get to the finish line already.

grubstake

01/28/14 2:56 PM

#8072 RE: Justfactsmam #8052

JFM: I never indicated any brooklyn relation to Noramco (another fact you missed). It is merely a fact as to what Noramco is known for. Furthermore, it was not addressed toward you and I'm pretty sure brooklyn doesn't need you to defend brooklyn.

4starman

01/29/14 10:58 AM

#8088 RE: Justfactsmam #8052

Justfactsmam sorry I do not pay the subscription for the private messaging. I'd rather use my money to pay for premium newsletters. I hope it works out for you.